• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bad experience collecting a ticket with Virgin Trains

Status
Not open for further replies.

shdale

New Member
Joined
20 Nov 2010
Messages
2
5pm on Friday and I’m booking an online train ticket for my mum who fancies trying a long-distant train journey to return home – advertised as a comfortable, convenient and cost effective travel option – “Get where you want to be… for less”. Everything went swimmingly (ticket only £35.00 which seemed reasonable for this particular part of the journey), printed the booking confirmation emails and still time for a last glass of wine whilst finishing the packing, repacking and more repacking.
Before leaving at a respectable 9am on Saturday to get to the train station on time, a last check was made to ensure mum had at least all the essentials including the printed travel information – and away we go in the car on another foggy day into the hustle and bustle of Birmingham. The heavy Saturday morning traffic into Birmingham with fog warnings and the usual morning-motor-monsters was, with hindsight, the calm before the storm.
On arrival at Birmingham New Street train station we parked up, purchased the required parking ticket and gathered all of the ‘essentials’ required for mum’s journey. First challenge was to get to the ticket booth to collect our ticket, printed confirmation in hand, so manoeuvring around the crowds and strategically picking the queue that looked to be moving more quickly than the others, we eagerly awaited our turn to be served.
The expected, welcoming “Good morning madam how may I help you?” (with a smile) was conveyed in the way of an early morning smirk, grunt and nod, followed by a more expressive and enthusiastic shake of the head, growl and pushing back of the paper we had offered and slid expectantly under the protection glass. In an apologetic, slightly panicked response (impending train departure and three further connections at the forefront of our minds) we then asked, indeed pleaded that he read our printed piece of paper in the hope of further guidance. Reluctantly and with further mutterings, said ‘train ticket booth guy’ told us to ‘use the machines they’re much quicker than me’, once again pushing back our printed piece of paper. At risk of further inconveniencing the increasingly vocal and hostile travellers in the queue behind, once again re-presenting the now rather crumpled booking confirmation email with payment details, train details, passenger details and seat number, and stating that we would like his help to provide us with instructions as to what we need to do next, a reasonable request we thought not least because of our lack of confidence in our own abilities at using the recommended machine (although now agreeing with him that it would probably have been considerably quicker). I have to admit that this is now the point at which my usual very calm and considered approach to life’s little challenges started to wobble. Having now glanced at the printed offering, progress we thought, said ‘train ticket booth guy’ stated with some finality that it was the ‘wrong’ piece of paper and that there was nothing he could do apart from sell us a new ticket. Speechless for a couple of seconds and panic rising considerably, we were now clearly unsatisfied with the service being provided to us. The previous statement was reiterated – Do you want a new ticket or not? Our request now changed to demand - that he advise us how we go about finding a solution to our problem. Now fed up with our demands on his time, and in the process of clearing his desk, we were told that he now refused to serve us in any way and in fact, would not now sell us a new ticket. He then walked away. Had we had more time, it is clear that this is the moment that any fee paying passenger would have called for the manager however, time was not on our side. Mum now upset and no other option, we conceded to try out the pre-paid ticket machine only to find that the booking reference provided in the printed confirmation was one too many digits for the machine to accept. We now had only one option – to purchase a new ticket (now £45.00 for same journey). I’d like to say that this was the end of this particular journey’s problems... Having settled mum onto the train and left her in her original ticket booking’s seat (assuming this had already been paid for first time around), we said our goodbyes and waved as the train departed. Mum telephoned a short while later to say that the Virgin Train’s ticket man now demanded that she pay an additional £10 for the seat that she had taken (and paid for) because the ticket that she was travelling with didn’t allow her to sit in that seat. She tried to show him the original booking details, with the seat number listed only to be presented with the now familiar refusal to look at this now completely valueless piece of paper and respond with “You must pay or move”. At this stage extremely stressed and upset, to avoid having to change seat on a moving train, with all of the baggage, mum decided to pay the additional £10.00 and looked forward to putting an end to this particular part of the journey, also vowing never to use trains again in the future.
I telephoned Virgin Trains customer relations department (tel. 0845 000 80005) to ask them about issues surrounding the ‘incorrect train booking ticket’. I was advised that another email should have been sent, the booking confirmation with all of the relevant information was not good enough to present for the journey. Even though Virgin Trains did not send the ‘correct’ email (I checked and double checked both my inbox and junk items folder) and I was led to believe that the booking confirmation that had in fact arrived via email was the document that was required to be printed, they were completely unwilling to concede that this was their problem.
The moral of this sorry tale is to all Virgin Train users (unless you are a seasoned traveller and you know exactly what to present or indeed, query if you are not sent the relevant documentation). Expect to pay again and again – your proof of payment, proof of booking, confirmation of journey details counts of nothing. If like us, you are infrequent train users – don’t if you can help it.
Virgin Trains are clearly not interested in delivering on their “Get where you want to be… for less” promise. A £35.00 Birmingham to London journey cost my mum £90.00 in the end – she could have got a Ryan Air flight to France for that. Virgin have refused to refund any of the journey, stating that it was our error to present the incorrect travel documentation.
As for the absolute plonker in booth 6 at Birmingham New Street Station (apx 10am on Saturday 20th November) maybe this level of service was because our request for help was out of his list of job responsibilities as ‘the train ticket booth guy’ – perhaps we should have asked the little old guy pushing the mop??
Incidentally, the continuing train journeys into France went without problem although I hasten to say that by this stage neither Birmingham New Street or Virgin Trains staff were involved.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
Righty...

1 - There was no reason for the way you were treated by the ticket office staff

2 - You should have been given the choice on how to collect the tickets
(on FastTicket - choose the collect option and enter the confirmation number)

3 - You were charged for another ticket because you were not in possession of a valid ticket
 

moonrakerz

Member
Joined
10 Feb 2009
Messages
870
Exactly how did you purchase the ticket ? If it was online you should have been given several options on how to collect the ticket. What exactly was the "confirmation" that you presented.
In most (if not all) cases you are given a 8 digit alpha-numeric code: eg: QW14R76V; which you use with the card you used to purchase the ticket to actually collect the ticket from either a machine or a ticket window.

You MUST have that code. Having the receipt or the itinerary is of no use because that means that it is possible for someone else to collect the ticket - so why should they give you a ticket on the strength of a receipt?

You state that were told that you had the "wrong" piece of paper - I would hazard a guess and say that you didn't have the 8 digit number !
As for the alleged "rudeness" of the staff - could I also hazard a guess that there was perhaps a little bit of two-way hostility !
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,804
Location
East Anglia
I have never known this problem. Always advised when buying to use fasticket machines which are so easy to use & plentiful. Even in the remotest chance that i had had to pay again the chance of the train manager, once explained of the problem, charging me a tenner for the seat would not happen. If it did, luggage or no, i would up my backside to the nearest vacant seat.
 

Wyvern

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2009
Messages
1,573
Clearly this is the wrong forum, populated as it is, by definition, with people knowledgable in using the railway, with not the slightest interest in the problems ordinary people have with railway bureaucracy.
 

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
The original post was difficult to read, obviously contained a degree of bias and a clear impression was left in my mind that the OP was in the wrong.

Because of his mistake bringing the wrong references, a new ticket was required.

What exactly does he want us to say?

It's not a question, more a summary of events in which he feels hard done by.

It isn't anything to do with bureaucracy, it is more to do with passing the blame onto the nasty railway because he cocked up.

The railway was not "unreasonable" by making them buy a new ticket because on the day, his mother had no proof she even had a ticket that belonged to her!
 

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093
The original post was difficult to read, obviously contained a degree of bias and a clear impression was left in my mind that the OP was in the wrong.

Because of his mistake bringing the wrong references, a new ticket was required.

What exactly does he want us to say?

It's not a question, more a summary of events in which he feels hard done by.

It isn't anything to do with bureaucracy, it is more to do with passing the blame onto the nasty railway because he cocked up.

The railway was not "unreasonable" by making them buy a new ticket because on the day, his mother had no proof she even had a ticket that belonged to her!

Whilst I generally agree with what you are saying here it does have to be said that for the ordinary passenger or someone unfamiliar with the vagaries of rail travel in this country buying/obtaining the correct ticket can be a minefield.
 

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
Printed confirmation
It really depends what page this refers to in the process
Normally this is just the confirmation that the payment has been processed
The ticket printout normally has all your travel information, including the reference number

I do agree though, if you've never used it before you could end up taking the wrong piece of paper
The lesson here is to print out ALL the pages, as they appear, plus all the emails
As far as I am aware you should receive two emails; one for payment and one for the ticket
Equally, you can store these on a suitable mobile device

As for Virgin Trains Booking office
No doubt they get this quite often, although they could have made a better attempt to direct you to the Train Ticket Booth Guy, with some basic directions (such as out of the office, turn left)
 

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
Quick question, why do they send two mails? Having only one would reduce the chance of not having the correct information with you, plus if it failed to get to you for any reason you would notice no emails more quickly than noticing one of two missing
 

EltonRoad

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2009
Messages
1,029
Location
Kendal
I have to say reading this that I'm fairly incredulous at what's being said to the OP. Nothing he says suggests he was "rude", "abusive" or "to blame" in any way. In fact it demonstrates even further how the rail industry is so quick to lay the blame at the customer's door when they turn up brandishing the "wrong" piece of paper, as catching a potential thief is far more important than actually giving a woman, accompanied by her son, the correct £35 ticket which she's paid for. People's normal reactions, like panicking when they don't get issued a ticket and the train's about to depart, are interpreted by booking office staff as hostility, and indeed some on here are saying the same. How do you expect the customer to react? Smile and hand over another £45 which they probably don't have?

I'm not rail staff, but I do have experience of working in a station booking/enquiry office for 6 months, and I know what's it's like. I would never have acted the way the clerk did at Birmingham, I'd have tried to get to the bottom of it, and I completely sympathise with the OP's plight.

Someone's asked why he has posted here when clearly he's made up his mind and that he's displaying "snobbish arrogance"! As well he might! The bloke at Birmingham wasn't exactly helpful, was he?

I guess, in order to sort this out, we need more info from the OP as to which booking engine he used and what details were on the printout, but it shouldn't be used as fuel to tell him he should have done this and should have done that, when from the sound of it he did act reasonably and was treated like a potential dodger.

I can never understand why rail staff seem to take offence when ordinary passengers describe adverse experiences they had on the railway, and the posters weren't involved themselves. I don't doubt that the great majority of rail staff are helpful but as in any industry you're going to get a few bad apples. Why not a more objective viewpoint?

If he did book with Virgin then, unless it's changed in the 6 weeks since I booked with them, you only get one email and it includes everything including booking reference.

Oh well, it just surprised me that a few above were so quick to criticise. The crux of the matter is that he wasn't issued with a ticket he'd paid for, was never given an explanation as to why he was being asked to pay for a new ticket, and that's why he's posting on here.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
73,034
Location
Yorkshire
The original post is difficult to read, and lacks sufficient information for me to provide much in the way of advise.

However the responses from First class and scotsman are disappointing and unhelpful. I share the concerns of EltonRoad.

shdale - can you do a 'Print Screen' of the booking confirmation email(s) you received (block out personally identifying info such as name & address), and attach it to a post please? What ticket was originally purchased and what ticket was later purchased? Did it involve First Class travel (this may explain the upgrade on the train)?

Whilst I generally agree with what you are saying here it does have to be said that for the ordinary passenger or someone unfamiliar with the vagaries of rail travel in this country buying/obtaining the correct ticket can be a minefield.

Absolutely. Some people will refuse to travel by train as a result. Sadly this makes some rail staff happy, because they feel that they do not need any extra customers using the railway and their jobs are secure regardless.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Clearly this is the wrong forum, populated as it is, by definition, with people knowledgable in using the railway, with not the slightest interest in the problems ordinary people have with railway bureaucracy.

Hear hear. The railway can be difficult enough to navigate even for seasoned experts, so how normals are meant to cope is beyond me. The usual judgmental, zero-tolerance posters on here making their mean little jibes.
 

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
The original post was difficult to read, obviously contained a degree of bias and a clear impression was left in my mind that the OP was in the wrong.

Because of his mistake bringing the wrong references, a new ticket was required.

What exactly does he want us to say?

It's not a question, more a summary of events in which he feels hard done by.

It isn't anything to do with bureaucracy, it is more to do with passing the blame onto the nasty railway because he cocked up.

The railway was not "unreasonable" by making them buy a new ticket because on the day, his mother had no proof she even had a ticket that belonged to her!

Quite. These comments aren't 'nasty jibes' - they are based on fact. Sure, the Clerk wasn't helpful but it's a bit rich to demean him the OP said. It's really an open and shut case - no booking ref = no ticket sadly.

If you have a look at Virgin Trains' Facebook page, you'll find many 'rants' like these - their objective seems to be to take out all their anger on Virgin Trains by going into elaborate detail of how their journey was screwed up and reccommend that no-one travel Virgin again. I'm not trying to protect them here, but these stories are 70% the poster's fault and they do themselves no favours when they write these without first trying to calm down.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Quite. These comments aren't 'nasty jibes' - they are based on fact. Sure, the Clerk wasn't helpful but it's a bit rich to demean him the OP said. It's really an open and shut case - no booking ref = no ticket sadly.

If you have a look at Virgin Trains' Facebook page, you'll find many 'rants' like these - their objective seems to be to take out all their anger on Virgin Trains by going into elaborate detail of how their journey was screwed up and reccommend that no-one travel Virgin again. I'm not trying to protect them here, but these stories are 70% the poster's fault and they do themselves no favours when they write these without first trying to calm down.

My point is not whether the OP's account is factual or not (only he knows that), but that it is undeniable that the ticketing system as viewed by the public is offputtingly complex. To you and I it may not look too hard, but we have used it often and probably studied it in some depth. Some posters seem to forget that they are experts and expect normals to be the same. They aren't and they can't be expected to be.

Maybe the term 'mean little jibes' was OTT. I'm sorry if it was. I do believe there is a genuine lack of concern (bordering on smugness) from certain posters on this forum about the real difficulties and humiliations faced by the public trying to navigate this quagmire.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
73,034
Location
Yorkshire
Quite. These comments aren't 'nasty jibes' - they are based on fact. .....
We do not know enough facts until we have more information, such as what was on his booking confirmation email. The comments do look like nasty jibes to many of us, I am glad you didn't intend it as such, but that can be how it looks.

BTW how was the 70% figure calculated?
 

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
My point is not whether the OP's account is factual or not, but that it is undeniable that the ticketing system as viewed by the public is offputtingly complex. To you and I it may not look too hard, but we have used it often and probably studied it in some depth. Some posters seem to forget that they are experts and expect normals to be the same. They aren't and they can't be expected to be.

Maybe the term 'mean little jibes' was OTT. I'm sorry if it was. I do believe there is a genuine lack of concern (bordering on smugness) from certain posters on this forum about the real difficulties and humiliations faced by the public trying to navigate this quagmire.

I understand that, but it really isn't hard - plus there's instructions on how to do it.

The only lack of concern I have is for deliberate fare evaders who come on here...

(And, no, I'm not comparing the OP to them in the slightest)
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
I understand that, but it really isn't hard - plus there's instructions on how to do it.

The only lack of concern I have is for deliberate fare evaders who come on here...

(And, no, I'm not comparing the OP to them in the slightest)

What is hard is selecting the right fare in the first place, and then understanding what you've bought. For you to say "but it really isn't hard" is meaningless, since you know exactly what you're doing. I've tried to explain some of my money saving moves to normals before and their eyes glaze over. Far from being impressed by the fact that it is in fact possible not to be ripped off by TOCs, they just seem to get irritated that one has to go to such trouble. Very few of them ever take up my tips AFAICS; they either don't believe me or don't get it, and either pay the standard fare or (more likely) don't travel by train.
 
Last edited:

Dreadnought

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2007
Messages
586
Quick question, why do they send two mails? Having only one would reduce the chance of not having the correct information with you, plus if it failed to get to you for any reason you would notice no emails more quickly than noticing one of two missing

Whenever I have used Virgin I have only ever received one email. If I was collecting tickets from the Fast Ticket Machine it had both the 9 digit (all numerical) booking confirmation number and the 8 digit Fast Ticket reference number on it as the subject of the email, with the Fast Ticket reference repeated later in the email.

It would only have the 9 digit reference number on if I have had the tickets posted to me.
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Sadly this makes some rail staff happy, because they feel that they do not need any extra customers using the railway and their jobs are secure regardless.

Was this really necessary? It's as cheap a jibe and as unjustified as what you are complaining about from other posters
 

PhilipW

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2008
Messages
758
Location
Fareham, Hants
Why are so many people here so unsympathetic to the problems of an ordinary passenger who is not that well up on the ins-and-outs of the railway.

Everyone can make a slip up, take the wrong sheet of paper, write down a number incorrectly, etc, etc, that is human nature.

If you do make an error and have to pay more money, I would hope that all concerned would be more than happy to re-imburse you if you could prove later that you had paid and had just made an unfortunate slip.

On a slightly different (but one that links in) topic, I travelled recently on an FGW Portsmouth tro Bristol train on a Friday evening. The train was packed, the environment was basic and 95% of those travelling were under 25. I just thought to myself "Nowadays you only travel by train if you have to, not because you choose to". Those that can afford to go by car will do so.

This story about his Mum's experiences just re-inforced that view. Buying a ticket, collecting it, travelling by train - "enjoyable", "relaxing", "stress free" - not any of those words spring to mind. Sad.
 

Nevasleep

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2010
Messages
78
It's really an open and shut case - no booking ref = no ticket sadly.
This is awful.
Why should it all depend on a single booking ref.

Booking office staff should have the ability to use train info/purchasing card number to find and print a ticket.
Use customer's name + address as security questions, or even add one in on purchasing.
 
Last edited:

NLC1072

Member
Joined
17 May 2010
Messages
640
Location
Ireland/London
you get two numbers on a confirmation email, sometimes one on each of two pages, one is a transaction number ie the all numerical one of 9 digits and one is alphanumerical, 8 digits which is the booking reference to bring in... Looks like the OP has lost the second part of the confirmation email print out to me which unfortunatly means a new ticket on the day ( you can print the confirmation out as many times as you like )
 

PhilipW

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2008
Messages
758
Location
Fareham, Hants
It's really an open and shut case - no booking ref = no ticket sadly.

It should not be like that at all. With true Customer Service a Clerk could use other information like name and/or Credit Card Number to get the ticket.

If you walk into John Lewis to collect an item that you have paid for but forgot your Reference Number, would you expect to be turned away in a brusque manner and told to buy it again.

Of course not.

Shame on the railways for having such an apalling attitude to customer service. Sadly many on this forum seem to think this is OK. How divorced that is from the aspirations of ordinary travellers.

Remember "To err is human, to forgive divine".
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,620
Location
Back office
It's quite possible that the OP purchased a Virgin Trains e-ticket in which case there's nothing that the booking office clerk could have done. If a ticket is purchased online then it is to be picked up at the TVM if there's one available.

As for being rude to a clerk, do so at your own risk!
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Sadly many on this forum seem to think this is OK. How divorced that is from the aspirations of ordinary travellers.

It's because they've swallowed the rule book and interpret (strictly correctly TBF) everything through the narrow prism of what is technically allowed and what isn't, without any regard as to whether the rules are in any way fair or reasonable. They are simply rules, and therefore are beyond question. Time and again these nasty individuals (not scotsman I hasten to add: I've not seen him doing this before) equate questioning of the rules with deliberate rule-breaking, and ALWAYS assume that anyone who has either made a mistake or who points out the utter absurdity of many of the rules is simply a chancer or straighforwardly dishonest.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,086
Sympathy for the situation there, when my girlfriend buys train tickets infact when any of my family her family friends friends family by train tickets am i called up and often go round to help out because out of about 60 people that the above list covers i am the only one who can usually do it right, stops them taking mik out of me for liking railways too :) It is very confusing and bewildering to most people, and was to me only a few years ago. Now i find it easy but still.... its a very over complicated system.

I have a few points to make though. The £10 charge for havign someone elses seat is absolutely ludicrous!!!! what the hell is the logic there. I cant remeber the amount of times i have got on an EC service from leeds to somewhere and seen 10s of reserved seats not in use, per coach! (ie loads fo leeds london seats un occupied by wakefield) so i sit in them (if i myself have no reserved) if they are nicer seats, the guards never have a problem and ive done this on XC virgin FGW TPE and EMT, if they havent turned up on the service then it doesnt matter if it is reserved or not?

Especially if she then gives a document showing she has booked them tickets, surely if she explains the situation then the conductor can see whats happened and maybe just let it by, doesnt seem like hed be doing anything wrong if he did....

cant comment on the rest but wll theres my view

Customer services wont listen although TPE are excellent :)
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
73,034
Location
Yorkshire
jimmyowl1992, I agree with you completely, but...
I have a few points to make though. The £10 charge for havign someone elses seat is absolutely ludicrous!!!! what the hell is the logic there.
... this may be Weekend First, although the amount is in theory £15 but there was a £10 trial (maybe this was extended?) between BHM & EUS so that might explain it. Weekend First is, in true ATOC stlye, incredibly complicated with each TOC doing it's own thing, so the prices do vary. However until the OP replies, we can't be sure what the £10 was for, but I'd be shocked if a guard was charging £10 under any other circumstance (I can't think of any...!)
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,086
jimmyowl1992, I agree with you completely, but...

... this may be Weekend First, although the amount is in theory £15 but there was a £10 trial (maybe this was extended?) between BHM & EUS so that might explain it. Weekend First is, in true ATOC stlye, incredibly complicated with each TOC doing it's own thing, so the prices do vary. However until the OP replies, we can't be sure what the £10 was for, but I'd be shocked if a guard was charging £10 under any other circumstance (I can't think of any...!)

That whole concept confuses me to be honest i dont think theres any need for a fine for sitting in someones seat, if they come you move why is it not just that simple....
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
73,034
Location
Yorkshire
That whole concept confuses me to be honest i dont think theres any need for a fine for sitting in someones seat, if they come you move why is it not just that simple....
My theory is their original ticket was First Class, and the replacement ticket was Standard Class, and she sat in her original booked seat, and was therefore charged Weekend First, and that the £10 trial on that route must have been extended. This is pure speculation and just a theory as I can think of no other rational explanation. A guard cannot issue a fine, and there would not be a £10 fare to explain this, other than Weekend First.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top