• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

'Big man' vs Sam Main incident (final decision: no charges for either)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,495
Location
UK
It's not illegal for someone to take photos or film in public

But it is to publish it without your knowledge or consent

Really? Care to quote that bit of law?

Afterwards, you best get yourself down to the Leveson Inquiry then, as the media publish photos and videos that feature the general public every day. With a view like that, kiss goodbye to all forms of media.

Nothing
on that train was private. If you don't want something appearing on the Internet or in the papers, don't do it.
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,992
Only a short time now until Hitller or the Nazis are mentioned.

Which you've just done. :roll:

Only a minor breach of Godwin's Law as you weren't making comparisons, only referencing. But I think you should still be charged. :p
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
And we now have the Daily Mail going in for another bit of character assassination by suggesting that Sam Main is being reported for trespassing on the line.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...train-hit-internet-video-charged-assault.html

Is it not more likely that the 'trespass' offence is in respect of his refusal to leave the train?
 

Old Timer

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
3,702
Location
On a plane somewhere at 35,000
oh christ! <(
No worries his colleagues think he is a ****** and the word is that he will be selectively "retired" on the redrawing of the Constituency Boundaries.

There are always lots of these stories in this, the silly season, because normally there is not that much going on at this time of year.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
And we now have the Daily Mail going in for another bit of character assassination by suggesting that Sam Main is being reported for trespassing on the line.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...train-hit-internet-video-charged-assault.html

Is it not more likely that the 'trespass' offence is in respect of his refusal to leave the train?
Yet another Rubicon crossed :roll: by a self-confessed Mail-hater.

Amazing how you guys always manage to find Daily Mail items that nobody else bothers with or indeed knows about.

I find this Obsession rather strange .
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
It's not illegal for someone to take photos or film in public

But it is to publish it without your knowledge or consent
IIRC (and I cannot quote chapter and verse) "general" crowd shots are fine, but you start treading on thin ice when individuals can be identified. A video such as this will fall into a grey area, because, though the individuals have not been identified, it is still a film about three individuals rather than a general shot, and it has proved easy enough to identify the individuals. Again IIRC there are exemptions covering activities such as journalism, but this film is not that. I also suspect the area is civil, so any action would have to be initiated by one of the parties.
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,992
Amazing how you guys always manage to find Daily Mail items that nobody else bothers with or indeed knows about.

Is it really amazing? I didn't go looking, just reading about this ongoing story across many forums. On one of which the DM story was linked to.

And that's strange and obsessive is it?
 

amcluesent

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2010
Messages
877
A sad day for railway staff and RPIs now that no pax will ever lift a finger to help when it all kicks off. We may video the kicking/stabbing on our mobis.
 

Tomonthetrain

Established Member
Joined
12 Jul 2011
Messages
1,290
And we now have the Daily Mail going in for another bit of character assassination by suggesting that Sam Main is being reported for trespassing on the line.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...train-hit-internet-video-charged-assault.html

Is it not more likely that the 'trespass' offence is in respect of his refusal to leave the train?

Just noticed that they are not accepting comments for "Legal Reasons". How long til Mr Main complains to the Daily Mail about trial by media?
 

Tav77

Member
Joined
10 Sep 2011
Messages
62
IIRC (and I cannot quote chapter and verse) "general" crowd shots are fine, but you start treading on thin ice when individuals can be identified. A video such as this will fall into a grey area, because, though the individuals have not been identified, it is still a film about three individuals rather than a general shot, and it has proved easy enough to identify the individuals. Again IIRC there are exemptions covering activities such as journalism, but this film is not that. I also suspect the area is civil, so any action would have to be initiated by one of the parties.

Spot On.

The Data Protection Act prohibits the recording of data that identifies an individual. A photograph qualifies and the DPA applies to CCTV monitoring, ID photos etc. However the DPA Part 1 Section 3 specifically exempts as a 'special purpose' photographs or other data recorded for journalism, or for artistic or literary purposes.

Source: photorights.org

As said above, the video quite clearly identifies the individuals and this is not allowed.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,495
Location
UK
Ever heard of citizen journalism? Not everyone needs an accredited press card to post/publish things. Think of all the blogs out there, or indeed this forum.
 

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
Do you think "big man" would have stepped in and tried to eject the lad if the lad was 6'6'',15 stone and looked as though he could handle himself??i wager the guard and the "big man" would have waited for the law to attend.
I was on a DOO service this evening, when an argument broke out between a man and a woman, because she had her bags on the seat he wanted to sit on. There were other seats available and she suggested he sat on one of those.
Now, of course, she was in the wrong, but he then proceeded to throw her bags on the floor!
Both myself and another passenger confronted him, and managed to calm the situation down, but at no point did the fact that he was bigger than me put me off doing what I felt was the right thing.
 

michael769

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2005
Messages
2,006
CPS guidelines say any injury less than GBH can suffice for ABH but you'd really struggle getting ABH for a graze.

CPS guidlines do not apply in Scotland.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
As said above, the video quite clearly identifies the individuals and this is not allowed.

Private individuals are not subject to the DPA.

------------

Police have charged a man with assault after an alleged fare-dodger was removed from a train by a passenger.

Mobile phone recordings by a passenger on board the Edinburgh to Perth train on 9 December have been viewed by almost two million people on You Tube.

It shows a man - since dubbed 'Big Man' - throwing a teenager off a train after he argued with a ticket inspector.

British Transport Police said a 35-year-old man from Stirling had been charged with assault.

The man is understood to be Alan Pollock.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-16288101

I can tell you one thing, if I ever see a guard needing aid against a passenger I won't be stepping in if that is the way people are rewarded for doing the right thing. The personal safety of all rail staff has been diminished tonight.

I feel ashamed to be British tonight.
 
Last edited:

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,495
Location
UK
Big Man was quite away from Mr Main, so I still can't see how he was somehow bullying because he was bigger - given that he quite possibly hadn't seen him at all to have any idea what size he was.
 

Tin Rocket

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2008
Messages
248
Location
midlands
I was on a DOO service this evening, when an argument broke out between a man and a woman, because she had her bags on the seat he wanted to sit on. There were other seats available and she suggested he sat on one of those.
Now, of course, she was in the wrong, but he then proceeded to throw her bags on the floor!
Both myself and another passenger confronted him, and managed to calm the situation down, but at no point did the fact that he was bigger than me put me off doing what I felt was the right thing.

Good for you,if big man had taken a leaf out of your book and tried to calm the situation down he might not be facing police charges and a possible criminal record right now.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
This little ****** is obviously just going to the media, and doing whatever he is told by some third party, to make it a story. He thought he was a "gangsta" and he got thrown off like the **** he is. "Alleged" fare dodger? He had a single for the wrong direction I thought? Worse things have happened on trains, I think this whole thing has been blown way out of proportion.

I think Main should be fixed so we don't have to deal with his offspring in the future if they're anything like him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tin Rocket

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2008
Messages
248
Location
midlands
And therein lies the rub. Some people think he has, some think he hasn't !

well it looks like its in the hands of the scottish justice system now and i'm sure they will reach the correct conclusion,i just hope scotrail back the man with his legal fees.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,153
Bet the chav gets nothing. Hope the guy who uploaded it is happy now, going back to what yorkie said in the first posts. Shame really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top