• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bio-mode operation FGW ??

Status
Not open for further replies.

cumfy

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2011
Messages
64
https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/about-us/greater-west/bagw/bristol

....The second part of this project is the Intercity Express Programme which includes the manufacture and delivery into service, as well as maintenance, of 57 trains to replace some of the Intercity 125 trains currently operating on the Great Western Railway. Three new depots, built at London, Bristol and Swansea, will provide nightly maintenance of these new trains.

Benefits:

Greater acceleration - reducing journey times
More seats and tables per carriage
40% more seats into London Paddington per day
Enhanced customer communication systems and on board service
Electric and bio-mode operations that reduce harmful emissions
Improved reliability compared with the trains they replace

New trains will have said mode.

I am perplexed, as is Google.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Rapidash

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
669
Location
Torbaydos, Devon
Both the class 800's and the AT300's that First are getting are Bimodes, the latter having gurt big uprated engines to avoid beached whale impressions on the Devon Banks. One can only assume they'll be running off of the hot air generated in Stoke Bishop and Totnes
 
Last edited:

cumfy

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2011
Messages
64
So they just mean diesel-electric. Thanks.

Does anyone know if they considered batteries ?
That would have been good. But perhaps the gaps were too large ?
 

HowardGWR

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
4,983
Both the class 800's and the AT300's that First are getting are Bimodes, the latter having gurt big uprated engines to avoid beached whale impressions on the Devon Banks. One can only assume they'll be running off of the hot air generated in Stoke Bishop and Totnes

Taking note of your spelling. I see Bristol is using human-effluent bio-produced gas for buses, so who knows in the future?
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Taking note of your spelling. I see Bristol is using human-effluent bio-produced gas for buses, so who knows in the future?

I also read online that the NR had signed a contract with a company to turn used coffee grounds from their major stations in to biofuel. Who knows, the left overs from ours coffees could be powering our trains soon.
 

cf111

Established Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,348
I suppose it might save money on emptying the retention tanks...
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,840
Location
Scotland
So they just mean diesel-electric. Thanks.
Bi-mode is different to diesel-electric. There are already plenty of D-E trains on the network (e.g. Voyagers, HSTs) these use their engines to power their electric motors full time. The bi-modes are different in that they are also capable of running in pure electric mode on electrified lines.
Does anyone know if they considered batteries ?
That would have been good. But perhaps the gaps were too large ?
The current generation of battery technology wouldn't give enough range. Battery trains are useful for short non-electrified branches in electrified areas but not for long stretches of high-speed mainline operation.
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
2,867
Location
Bristol
I also read online that the NR had signed a contract with a company to turn used coffee grounds from their major stations in to biofuel. Who knows, the left overs from ours coffees could be powering our trains soon.

Even more profit for them to avoid paying tax on....
 

cumfy

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2011
Messages
64
The current generation of battery technology wouldn't give enough range.

Battery development has improved cost and performance. Now a 20 ft shipping container full will give 500kwh @ 2MW, so a voyager could go for 2 hours at an average of half power, 80mph at least, 160 miles say.

Cost about £1.2m though!
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,840
Location
Scotland
Battery development has improved cost and performance. Now a 20 ft shipping container full will give 500kwh @ 2MW, so a voyager could go for 2 hours at an average of half power, 80mph at least, 160 miles say.

Cost about £1.2m though!
Yes, it's impressive how much things have progressed in the last half-decade. Still not quite there though for trains - that same 20ft container could house a large generator and fuel tank that would easily give you a 500 mile range at full speed.
 

Stats

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2009
Messages
943
It was news to me, but some forum members may remember that Virgin trialled running a Voyager on biofuel some years ago.

First UK biodiesel train launched
The UK's first train to run on biodiesel is going into service as part of an attempt to make rail travel more environmentally friendly.
The Virgin Voyager has been modified to run on eco-friendly fuel and the company is aiming to convert more in the future.

The train uses a blended fuel which is 20% biodiesel - to reduce CO2 emissions without harming the engine.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
If the government could get a deal at the correct price with Bombardier, then the Voyagers/Meridians could have a pantograph car added and be proper DEMU trains.

As stated in other threads, the Class 800/801(IEP) and AT300 trains are EDMU trains.

Bu I suspect in time for the Voyagers/Meridians in time, that you will be able to remove the diesel engines and place battery packs in their place to power the train and if they also have a pantograph car added as well I suspect then they will become BEMU's?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,472
Bu I suspect in time for the Voyagers/Meridians in time, that you will be able to remove the diesel engines and place battery packs in their place to power the train and if they also have a pantograph car added as well I suspect then they will become BEMU's?

I applaud you for remaining hopeful, however the only chance of big money being poured into these units will be if ROSCOs fear that they will fall out of use while there is still money to be made from them.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I applaud you for remaining hopeful, however the only chance of big money being poured into these units will be if ROSCOs fear that they will fall out of use while there is still money to be made from them.

There is also the need as to what to do with the class 180's, should finance at the right price be given to add pantograph cars to the Voyagers/Meridians.

I am also interested to see what happens to the class 180's with the introduction of Class 365/387. IEP and AT300 trains as they seem to have no future past 2017, unless they go to someone like Grand Central who already operates class 180's.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,472
There is also the need as to what to do with the class 180's, should finance at the right price be given to add pantograph cars to the Voyagers/Meridians.

I am also interested to see what happens to the class 180's with the introduction of Class 365/387. IEP and AT300 trains as they seem to have no future past 2017, unless they go to someone like Grand Central who already operates class 180's.

Grand Central have confirmed that they will be taking on the five FGW Class 180s in order to replace their HSTs. Unless DB feels the need to order new replacement trains their future should be secure.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,443
...unless they go to someone like Grand Central who already operates class 180's.

GC announced/confirmed that they were taking them to replace their HSTs at least two years ago, it was first mentioned in a track access application, hence this press release:

The proposed investments include:
Significant investment in the rolling stock to improve reliability, including the option to move to a uniform fleet of Class 180 trains

http://www.grandcentralrail.com/about-us/news-press/grand-central-seeks-rail-contract-extension/

Here's a news item from last October:

Grand Central has also ordered a further five Class 180s from Angel Trains, to add to the five it already uses, which will be put into operation from 2017.

http://www.railtechnologymagazine.c...tral-adding-five-more-class-180s-to-its-fleet
 
Last edited:

Western Lord

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
783
Battery development has improved cost and performance. Now a 20 ft shipping container full will give 500kwh @ 2MW, so a voyager could go for 2 hours at an average of half power, 80mph at least, 160 miles say.

Cost about £1.2m though!

The problem with battery powered vehicles, be they trains, cars or even aircraft, is that the batteries will not just have to provide propulsion, but also the power for all the ancilliary services. On a train you will want lighting, heating, air conditioning, hot drinks and food etc. At present, the electrical power for this comes (in the case of a diesel engine) via a generator, more or less for free.
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,504
Location
Southampton
Western Lord said:
The problem with battery powered vehicles, be they trains, cars or even aircraft, is that the batteries will not just have to provide propulsion, but also the power for all the ancilliary services. On a train you will want lighting, heating, air conditioning, hot drinks and food etc. At present, the electrical power for this comes (in the case of a diesel engine) via a generator, more or less for free.
The power for these things is available easily, but it's definitely not free! A battery should be no different in this regard. The overall problem is that liquid fuels still have better energy densities than even the best cells that we currently have. One school of thought says that we should perhaps instead seek cells with less capacity but very high recharge rates such as super capacitors, which can recharge rapidly when the train stops.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,332
Both the class 800's and the AT300's that First are getting are Bimodes, the latter having gurt big uprated engines to avoid beached whale impressions on the Devon Banks. One can only assume they'll be running off of the hot air generated in Stoke Bishop and Totnes

I think they will all have the same diesel engines its just that the ones for the South West will have them set at a higher rating.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
There is also the need as to what to do with the class 180's, should finance at the right price be given to add pantograph cars to the Voyagers/Meridians.

I can't see any existing trains having pantograph cars added, if there wasn't a business case before there won't be one now as the period to make back the investment only continues to decrease.

Should the Voyagers and Meridians find they have no work for in the future I think it's more likely they will be adapted for regional use with reduced power/fuel use/top speed and a greater seating density.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I can't see any existing trains having pantograph cars added, if there wasn't a business case before there won't be one now as the period to make back the investment only continues to decrease.

Should the Voyagers and Meridians find they have no work for in the future I think it's more likely they will be adapted for regional use with reduced power/fuel use/top speed and a greater seating density.

In a way I was hoping that would be what would happen with the class 180's that FGW have and that they would be put to use on the Reading - Redhill/Gatwick route.
 

Rich McLean

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2012
Messages
1,685
FYI, FGW will lose a 180 in September to GC. 4 will remain until 2017, unless that has changed in the last 6 months
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
In a way I was hoping that would be what would happen with the class 180's that FGW have and that they would be put to use on the Reading - Redhill/Gatwick route.

I can't imagine the 180s would ever have been a candidate for bi-mode conversion as the power is transmitted directly, not via traction motors.
 
Last edited:

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,443
FYI, FGW will lose a 180 in September to GC. 4 will remain until 2017, unless that has changed in the last 6 months

The recently available GW direct award agreement (dated March 2015) says they are off lease Dec 2016, with four immediately subleased back to FGW until such time as they are replaced by SET, presumably DfT have arranged that to avoid embarrassment if the SETs are late...
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,231
The recently available GW direct award agreement (dated March 2015) says they are off lease Dec 2016, with four immediately subleased back to FGW until such time as they are replaced by SET, presumably DfT have arranged that to avoid embarrassment if the SETs are late...

And why might they be late? It is the electrification work that is running behind, not Hitachi's production and testing plans.

On Cotswold Line duties, where the 180s currently operate, the 800s will have to work on diesel west of Oxford anyway, so swapping some of them for 180s is unlikely to be that much of an issue in terms of future stock transfers. And certainly less of a problem than ensuring, if wires fall short of Bristol for longer than planned, that enough HSTs are freed for modernisation for Scotrail.
 
Last edited:

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,443
And why might they be late? It is the electrification work that is running behind, not Hitachi's production and testing plans.

I didn't say they would be late, just that DfT have apparently allowed for a sublease without a declared end date.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top