• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 345 progress

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,375
Lets hope it has far less issues than the 700s have on Thameslink. Five months until they first run in public service isn't it?

Just how much of a revolution is it from the 387s?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,437
Does not look like there is any room for yellow.

There would probably be just enough room for the minimum required area of yellow that would be used on an EMU, which is only a 1 square metre patch, but with a minimum dimension of only 60 cm. So a 1.67 m x 0.6 m area between window and coupler would be OK.

Most of the yellow area on existing units is far in excess of the actual requirement.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Lets hope it has far less issues than the 700s have on Thameslink. Five months until they first run in public service isn't it?

Just how much of a revolution is it from the 387s?

Sooner than that.

To be fair the 700s are a completely new type of train and SWT won't have to do quite so much testing as GTR had to.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,290
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
Sooner than that.

To be fair the 700s are a completely new type of train and SWT won't have to do quite so much testing as GTR had to.

Not least they'll potentially have less issues to deal with too - The 700s having to work with ATO & AC/DC changeovers en-route, something the 707s wont have to be dealing with.
 

Via Bank

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2010
Messages
672
Location
London
This thread is to discuss the Crossrail Aventra units, not SWT 707s.

My "expert's prediction" is that they'll be a reliability disaster for the first few weeks, before bedding in. Much like all new equipment tends to be.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
This thread is to discuss the Crossrail Aventra units, not SWT 707s.

My "expert's prediction" is that they'll be a reliability disaster for the first few weeks, before bedding in. Much like all new equipment tends to be.

Indeed. It's as much unit issues as driver familiarly in the early days.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I thought the whole point of introducing them this early was to intentionally go through all that now so that potential issues when the really crucial central section opens are minimised. They'll also potentially be doing the proving work for the Aventra series as a whole - I imagine the 710 and (whatever class the GA units will be) deployments will be made simpler by virtue of this.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,202
That was undoubtedly part of their reasoning for purchasing them. The more any model is manufactured, the more reliable it promises to be. It's a brute force trial for defects that you as a purchaser don't have to pay for.
 

CP165

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2011
Messages
100
Location
Berkshire
345 undergoing climatic wind tunnel tests in Austria. Photo courtesy of TfL.

2e5e673d1234a2a817be50172823d07f.jpg


They must have to insulate the open gangway really well to conduct the testing!
 

The Growl

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2016
Messages
97
Location
Greenwich
345 undergoing climatic wind tunnel tests in Austria. Photo courtesy of TfL.

2e5e673d1234a2a817be50172823d07f.jpg


They must have to insulate the open gangway really well to conduct the testing!

Why on earth would a metro train going through tunnels and brushing against diesel traction have open gangways? Ventilation or something?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Why on earth would a metro train going through tunnels and brushing against diesel traction have open gangways? Ventilation or something?

Note that it is a single car in the testing chamber. In service, there will be something attached to the gangway at the rear that could otherwise be described as open at the time of the photo unless there were to be some form of insulation.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,355
Why would they need to insulate the gangway? It's testing whether the train still works (electrics etc) in extreme weather conditions.
 

fredk

Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
100
Why would they need to insulate the gangway? It's testing whether the train still works (electrics etc) in extreme weather conditions.

Because they only have 1 car of the train and it would affect the results if there were a huge hole at one end.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,268
Location
St Albans
Why would they need to insulate the gangway? It's testing whether the train still works (electrics etc) in extreme weather conditions.

Just think about your comment. The test vehicle is a single car with a full gangway at the opposite end to the driving cab. This gangway doesn't have any door as it is permanently open through the train. Now if you are testing the train in sub-zero temperatures, it is reasonable to assume that it refers to the extermnal temperature. So just as the passengers appreciate that the temperature of the train is controlled, so do all the internal systems, fabrics and finishings perform as intended in that environment.
Thus it is necessary to place an insulated closure over the exposed gangway opening during this test to replicate real-world climatic conditions. :)
 

The Growl

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2016
Messages
97
Location
Greenwich
Note that it is a single car in the testing chamber. In service, there will be something attached to the gangway at the rear that could otherwise be described as open at the time of the photo unless there were to be some form of insulation.

Oh ok. Hadn't noticed it was only a single carriage. :)
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,355
Just think about your comment. The test vehicle is a single car with a full gangway at the opposite end to the driving cab. This gangway doesn't have any door as it is permanently open through the train. Now if you are testing the train in sub-zero temperatures, it is reasonable to assume that it refers to the extermnal temperature. So just as the passengers appreciate that the temperature of the train is controlled, so do all the internal systems, fabrics and finishings perform as intended in that environment.
Thus it is necessary to place an insulated closure over the exposed gangway opening during this test to replicate real-world climatic conditions. :)

Its nothing to do with interior comfort, finishings etc, it's a test of mechanical system function in extreme conditions. Im well aware there is an open gangway at one end, my point is that should have no bearing on mechanical function and therefore this test.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
I thought the whole point of introducing them this early was to intentionally go through all that now so that potential issues when the really crucial central section opens are minimised. They'll also potentially be doing the proving work for the Aventra series as a whole - I imagine the 710 and (whatever class the GA units will be) deployments will be made simpler by virtue of this.

Not really. The 345 are 23m carriages and the 710 are 20m so guaging wise there nothing the 345 work will help on the 710 project plus the 345 and 710 will operate on different sections of tracks so they will need full testing on those routes.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,268
Location
St Albans
Its nothing to do with interior comfort, finishings etc, it's a test of mechanical system function in extreme conditions. Im well aware there is an open gangway at one end, my point is that should have no bearing on mechanical function and therefore this test.

If the train car is inert then the temperature will be the same inside and out (eventually) but things change when the temperature is returned to ambient. The ice in the chamber will melt and condense as water - particularly on the interior surfaces, including upholstery, internal wall and ceiling panels, internal electronics - (PIS maybe), - indeed all of those surfaces and spaces not intended to operate under those conditions. There isn't a problem with the exterior as that is protected against water ingress such as rain, spray, snow etc.. So the fix is to close the open gangway aperture off with an insulated door/panel. If the insulation wasn't of similar performance to the main body, its inner surface would be iced up and would also drive the interior below spec. causing the condensation issues covered above.
If the train car is powered with the internal temperature maintained at a service design temperature, the open gangway would need to be closed off to allow the heating to perform correctly.
 

Harbon 1

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2011
Messages
1,020
Location
Burton on Trent
Some of the carriages have internal doors which I assume operate in an emergency. Can't remember whether the DMs have them or not, I don't get much time on the assembly line.
 

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
1,936
Location
Rochdale
If its anything like the 323s that were also tested here along with others, then they just put a big chunk of gangway shaped wood over the end. Not too complicated :lol::lol:
 

phoenixcronin

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2016
Messages
208
Location
London
Some of the carriages have internal doors which I assume operate in an emergency. Can't remember whether the DMs have them or not, I don't get much time on the assembly line.

Do you mean the divider type things found between some Class 700 cars?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Its nothing to do with interior comfort, finishings etc, it's a test of mechanical system function in extreme conditions. Im well aware there is an open gangway at one end, my point is that should have no bearing on mechanical function and therefore this test.

Quoting the BBC:

Operations director Howard Smith said: "It's important that we check that the new trains can operate in anything that the changing British weather can throw at them and it won't be long before our customers will be able to get on board a train."
Weather simulations tested the heating, ventilation, air-conditioning system, windscreen wipers, demister, train horns and traction motors.

I would argue that the HVAC systems are most definitely there for passenger comfort!
 

Hophead

Established Member
Joined
5 Apr 2013
Messages
1,193
Quoting the BBC:



I would argue that the HVAC systems are most definitely there for passenger comfort!

When I read that quote from the BBC report, I couldn't help noticing the omission of "doors". I'm hoping they will be as reliable as the rest of the systems tested once they encounter a British winter.
 

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
Some of the carriages have internal doors which I assume operate in an emergency. Can't remember whether the DMs have them or not, I don't get much time on the assembly line.

Really? Best you keep away from the assembly line in that case ;)

The only internal doors on a class 345 are from the driving cab into the train. The rest of the train is just one big open space to cope with passenger loadings.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Really? Best you keep away from the assembly line in that case ;)

The only internal doors on a class 345 are from the driving cab into the train. The rest of the train is just one big open space to cope with passenger loadings.

I expect that there will be some sort of emergency partition doors that'll be able to be deployed in the event of smoke in the passenger area.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
I expect that there will be some sort of emergency partition doors that'll be able to be deployed in the event of smoke in the passenger area.
Once I was told about them, they became easy to see on the 700s.
 

The Growl

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2016
Messages
97
Location
Greenwich
When I read that quote from the BBC report, I couldn't help noticing the omission of "doors". I'm hoping they will be as reliable as the rest of the systems tested once they encounter a British winter.

Well as long as the electrics aren't affected, along with internal mechanisms, it should all be fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top