It seems criminal to break up trains that are fast and comfortable and which are only about half way through their life.
I understand that Eurostar doesn't want them to be used by a competitor, but could they not be sold with a restrictive covenant?
Certainly it is to be hoped they will not go the way of the Blue Pullman. At least one set must be preserved for posterity, railtours etc.
Among the reasons which have been advanced on these forums are:
* They are mechanically and possibly electrically very worn, having spent many hours per week travelling at high speed for 20+ years
* Their multiple traction and signalling systems mean they are very complex and expensive to maintain
* Interiors of unrefurbished sets are very worn
* They are far too long for any stations other than those on HS1 and would be very difficult (and therefore expensive) to reconfigure as shorter sets
* They are very slow to embark / disembark pax at intermediate stations (only 1 narrow door per coach per side)
* They draw too much current for non-HS1 power supply equipment to deliver
* There is no shortage of long distance electric stock
As for railtours, how much demand would there be between St P, Ebbsfleet and Ashford - because using them anywhere else would be very problematic, not least for gauging reasons.
The sets used by GNER were much newer (then) and were the shorter sets, but even so their use was not straightforward, and GNER got rid of them as soon as they could.