• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 376 refurbishment in 2023 - no air con or toilets to be added

Status
Not open for further replies.

ert47

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2010
Messages
688
Seeing that Southern and TL are basically the same company, the 707s have a lot in common with the TL 700s, so that would work also.
Same parent company, yes but maintaince wise, it could be a bit of a struggle - the TL depots have to do a fine balancing act to make sure that theyre not over stocked on some occasions - though with the 455s gone, I wonder how much space is now available at Selhurst to do heavy maintence on stock.

But then if the 376s are only operated on short distance routes, what makes them different from Underground trains like the 92s going out to Epping, or the S8s going out to Amersham?
TfL is managed differently and aren't usually held to the same criterior as NR
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,008
Location
London
Yeah the fitting of toilets of stock for inner Metro routes seems a bit of a waste of space. Makes far more sense to put toilets in stations. So toilets not being added to 376s here makes sense to me.

The lack of AC retrofitting is such a poor move though. Especially when electrostars/turbostars are such a common unit and it's a modular component.
 

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,375
Location
Kent
Admittedly on fast trains that don't stop I prefer opening windows as it makes the train feel cooler weirdly. and on buses the air conditioning is always terrible anyway and my motion sickness isn't helped by the lack of airflow. However, for the journeys 376s do they need air conditioning as there isn't enough opportunity for airflow like there would be on faster services.
 

supervc-10

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2012
Messages
736
having an overheated train is just a way of spreading germs due to passengers going out onto cold platforms from a warm train and vice versa which is why colds spread in winter due to overheated trains, shops and offices
Reiterating what @jackot said- colds are predominantly spread by respiratory droplets, and the reason they spread in winter is that we spend more of our time in enclosed spaces, not because those spaces are heated.

Anyway- I do think the 376s would benefit from AC. This country is starting to need AC everywhere. I bought a 'portable' AC unit in 2020 and it's one of the best things I've ever bought. Means I can actually sleep in the summer!
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,257
Location
St Albans
TfL is managed differently and aren't usually held to the same criterior as NR
They both have trains that carry standard MkI human beings.

Reiterating what @jackot said- colds are predominantly spread by respiratory droplets, and the reason they spread in winter is that we spend more of our time in enclosed spaces, not because those spaces are heated.

Anyway- I do think the 376s would benefit from AC. This country is starting to need AC everywhere. I bought a 'portable' AC unit in 2020 and it's one of the best things I've ever bought. Means I can actually sleep in the summer!
So let's add to the rate of climate change by trying to override it. :rolleyes: A/C will become the major climate chage cause as the temperature rises.

Yeah the fitting of toilets of stock for inner Metro routes seems a bit of a waste of space. Makes far more sense to put toilets in stations. So toilets not being added to 376s here makes sense to me.

The lack of AC retrofitting is such a poor move though. Especially when electrostars/turbostars are such a common unit and it's a modular component.
There's no guarantee that a retro fitted A/C system will be reliable or effective.

I dare you to travel on a 455 if we have another heatwave like in last summer and tell me that

Edit: Sorry I’m not sure why the text size has gone large
I note that you say "if". If we don't then it's not really a problem. If we do then a part of the blame for the heatwave is down to insisting on A/C.
 
Last edited:

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,225
Location
Central Belt
They both have trains that carry standard MkI human beings.


So let's add to the rate of climate change by trying to override it. :rolleyes: A/C will become the major climate chage cause as the temperature rises.


There's no guarantee that a retro fitted A/C system will be reliable or effective.


I note that you say "if". If we don't then it's not really a problem. If we do then a part of the blame for the heatwave is down to insisting on A/C.
I must admit Moorgate station is a lot less comfortable when the 717s arrived. The heat they take out the coach ends up somewhere- the platform.

I remember when the 376s were ordered air con wasn’t ordered as it was viewed the stops were too close together and the constant opening of the doors would make it ineffective.
 

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,375
Location
Kent
If we do then a part of the blame for the heatwave is down to insisting on A/C.
I hardly believe that the increase in temperature outside of large cities is down to air conditioning on even a minor level, taking into account that countries and places that don't have air conditioned trains are still getting hotter - almost as if the air con isn't responsible for it.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,257
Location
St Albans
I hardly believe that the increase in temperature outside of large cities is down to air conditioning on even a minor level, taking into account that countries and places that don't have air conditioned trains are still getting hotter - almost as if the air con isn't responsible for it.
Yes of course, the argument that 'my little contribution doesn't affect the total'. That's why we're in the dangerous place that we are. Every kWh that is used to do work generates heat! That's a fundamental of thermodynamics. Air conditioning, like all other forms of refrigeration, is always a net producer of heat. It doesn't create cold, it just moves heat from one place to another, converting higher forms of energy (e.g. electricity) to the lowest i.e. heat.
 
Last edited:

jackot

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2021
Messages
343
Location
38,000ft
I hardly believe that the increase in temperature outside of large cities is down to air conditioning on even a minor level, taking into account that countries and places that don't have air conditioned trains are still getting hotter - almost as if the air con isn't responsible for it.
Yes, aircon may be responsible for tiny incremental local changes in the temperature of huge cities (by physically blowing heat from inside the train) - but the difference adding 36 more trains makes to this is basically zero as you said. The real issue is the electricity the a/c units use, but this is a very small number compared to the traction motors.

Above everything, we should be thinking about the potential risk to the travelling public (especially the elderly/vulnerable) during a heatwave on these trains. The average human emits around 100W of heat even when idle, so on a 35+ degree day with 75+ people in each carriage, you don't need to do any more calculations to realise its' not particularly safe.
 

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,008
Location
London
There's no guarantee that a retro fitted A/C system will be reliable or effective.
The HVAC systems on Electrostars and Turbostars are modular. There's no reason why they couldn't use the same design of system that's been proven in every other AC-fitted Electrostar and Turbostars. The 378 Capitalstars have air cooling already and are nearly identical to 376s.

This isn't like trying to weave a modern AC system into an old steam heated Mk 1 or something, it's literally a drop-in system in the roof.

I remember when the 376s were ordered air con wasn’t ordered as it was viewed the stops were too close together and the constant opening of the doors would make it ineffective.
That was an arguable concern originally, but it isn't really an issue. Plenty of other inner metro stock has air conditioning, both in London and world-wide in even hotter climates. Besides the 376s will be operating outdoors, whereas for example the 717s and S7/S8 LU stock operates in enclosed hot tunnels, and the AC still works fine.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,257
Location
St Albans
The HVAC systems on Electrostars and Turbostars are modular. There's no reason why they couldn't use the same design of system that's been proven in every other AC-fitted Electrostar and Turbostars. The 378 Capitalstars have air cooling already and are nearly identical to 376s.

This isn't like trying to weave a modern AC system into an old steam heated Mk 1 or something, it's literally a drop-in system in the roof.


That was an arguable concern originally, but it isn't really an issue. Plenty of other inner metro stock has air conditioning, both in London and world-wide in even hotter climates. Besides the 376s will be operating outdoors, whereas for example the 717s and S7/S8 LU stock operates in enclosed hot tunnels, and the AC still works fine.
The point is that retrofitting A/C into a train heavily used and 2/3 way into it's working life might not give the same results as a train fitted that way from new.
 

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,008
Location
London
The point is that retrofitting A/C into a train heavily used and 2/3 way into it's working life might not give the same results as a train fitted that way from new.
What difference would that make to a brand new AC system, when the trains were designed to be equipped with AC (hence the modular design?) And from my experience, the air cooling alone on 378s works perfectly well on metro stocks, while the full AC on 377s is, if anything, too effective!
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
6,148
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
What difference would that make to a brand new AC system, when the trains were designed to be equipped with AC (hence the modular design?) And from my experience, the air cooling alone on 378s works perfectly well on metro stocks, while the full AC on 377s is, if anything, too effective!
It's not so much the brand new A/C system; the 376's are over 15 years old and if A/C wasn't specified at the time, then it might be that they were built in such a way in that A/C can't be retrofitted without some sort of reconstruction and rewiring and thus, incurring more costs. I doubt the owning company would like that
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
5,436
Installing a/c on trains that have been running for almost 20 years might not be as simple as fitting from new, even if other members of the family of trains (Electrostar) have been supplied with it from new. It would probably involve wholesale replacement of seals and changes to the wiring - in some cases stripping back to bare body shells. Given the heavy use of the stock, there is probably a maximum of 10- 15 years service life left in them so insisting on what could be a potentially complicated refit might delay or even remove the prospects for a refurbishment.
They retrofitted a lot of New York Subway cars from the 1960s with air con. I'm not sure how extensive the rebuild was, in terms of stripping out the cars, but they retained their original interior, and the hopper windows were simply riveted shut. They got another 30 odd years out of the R32 cars so it was probably it.
 

D7666

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2013
Messages
883
The trouble is these days the word refurbish is much misused. What 376s are getting is what in old BR days would have been a main overhaul but it suits TOC media spin to fit a few odds and sods minor bits of passenger facing kit and they can dress it up as a refurbishment. Changing seat moquette pattern, painting handrails a different colour, twiddling with seating layout to add or subtract disabled and or luggage space, painting the things in new livery, is not refurbishment, most of it is overhaul that has to be done anyway. But because the word refurbishment is used by the TOC, expectations become high towards step changes. Too high. Refurbish / refresh / rebuild / overhaul all get muddled - they mean different things to different TOC or RoSCo at different times depending on what they want to say at the time. I can think of certain "refreshes" by one TOC on one type of EMU that were more extensive than "refurbishments" on the same class but different TOC.
 

Agent_Squash

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2016
Messages
1,245
What difference would that make to a brand new AC system, when the trains were designed to be equipped with AC (hence the modular design?) And from my experience, the air cooling alone on 378s works perfectly well on metro stocks, while the full AC on 377s is, if anything, too effective!
The 378s have full air conditioning. Don’t know where this urban myth that they only have air cooling has came from…
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,748
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
The trouble is these days the word refurbish is much misused. What 376s are getting is what in old BR days would have been a main overhaul but it suits TOC media spin to fit a few odds and sods minor bits of passenger facing kit and they can dress it up as a refurbishment. Changing seat moquette pattern, painting handrails a different colour, twiddling with seating layout to add or subtract disabled and or luggage space, painting the things in new livery, is not refurbishment, most of it is overhaul that has to be done anyway. But because the word refurbishment is used by the TOC, expectations become high towards step changes. Too high. Refurbish / refresh / rebuild / overhaul all get muddled - they mean different things to different TOC or RoSCo at different times depending on what they want to say at the time. I can think of certain "refreshes" by one TOC on one type of EMU that were more extensive than "refurbishments" on the same class but different TOC.

This is a trend I’ve noticed, in the same way “upgrade” is too often used to describe something that’s essentially basic upkeep.

Refurbishment should be essentially describing delivery the equivalent of a brand new train. WAGN’s 317/2 to 317/6 was genuinely transformational, as were the various 1990s LU jobs. Same for the 411s. Completely agree that new seat covers and a few painted grab poles is barely a transformation.
 

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,008
Location
London
The 378s have full air conditioning. Don’t know where this urban myth that they only have air cooling has came from…
My apologies. I actually dug up an old map I had saved from a past heatwave showing air conditioned and air cooled routes. It showed 378s as air cooled!

I think it was put together by either Londonist or Geoff Marshall, so blame them :P

This is a trend I’ve noticed, in the same way “upgrade” is too often used to describe something that’s essentially basic upkeep.

Refurbishment should be essentially describing delivery the equivalent of a brand new train. WAGN’s 317/2 to 317/6 was genuinely transformational, as were the various 1990s LU jobs. Same for the 411s. Completely agree that new seat covers and a few painted grab poles is barely a transformation.
SWT 455s spring to mind as a genuinely game-changing refurbishment. Although again, no retrofitted aircon, much like these 376s!

Could the power supply be an issue for adding aircon? I don't know anything about the track power situation in SE land, or even if AC/hotel power is a major power draw vs traction power.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,748
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
SWT 455s spring to mind as a genuinely game-changing refurbishment.

Agreed, although personally I thought it was a little over-rated. I preferred Southern’s 455 refurb (though of course I never commuted on either fleet, only an occasional user, so my judgement clouded by that).

Could the power supply be an issue for adding aircon? I don't know anything about the track power situation in SE land, or even if AC/hotel power is a major power draw vs traction power.

Maybe. Adding additional hotel loads to a fleet of trains and running them day-in-day-out is always going to alter the loadings, but by the same token the area has already seen some quite significant enhancements to the power system over time. It would be less of a step-change than going from 400 series stock to modern stock. Likewise now there’s (presumably) less requirement for 12 car peak working this could give some extra headroom.

Someone with the relevant knowledge who have to comment as to what the network is specified to be able to cope with.
 

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,375
Location
Kent
Agreed, although personally I thought it was a little over-rated. I preferred Southern’s 455 refurb (though of course I never commuted on either fleet, only an occasional user, so my judgement clouded by that).
I've travelled on both but not extensively. The Southern ones were less roomy and comfortable and felt quite hot inside, unusually more than the SWT ones. The SWT ones from a passenger perspective were much better.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,562
Location
Yorkshire
Could the power supply be an issue for adding aircon? I don't know anything about the track power situation in SE land, or even if AC/hotel power is a major power draw vs traction power.
Possibly. One thing I don't think has been mentioned is that the 376s have hopper windows which don't lock. If aircon was to be fitted these would need to be either permanently sealed shut or have locks fitted which could only be opened by staff in the event of the aircon failing. Given the propensity of anti-social behaviour on the routes the units operate, it wouldn't surprise me to see those windows being forced open quite frequently. You could of course remove the windows entirely and replace with a one-piece pane, but that's another thing that costs money.
 

Route115?

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2021
Messages
313
Location
Ruislip
One of the problems with toilets is diability requirements, you could benefit 99% of the population taking 30% of the floor space but thats not going to happen. Also, the fitting of water & retention tanks is a major undertaking. The solution is to make sure that all stations have working toilets and at all times, which is also a staffing issue.

With air conditioning, yes the country is getting hotter & non a/c trains are miserable during a heatwave. Chiltern fitted air con to their 165s & I believe that Gt Eastern (whatever the franchise was at the time) fitted it to their 321s so it can be refitted to older stock.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,776
The trouble is these days the word refurbish is much misused. What 376s are getting is what in old BR days would have been a main overhaul but it suits TOC media spin to fit a few odds and sods minor bits of passenger facing kit and they can dress it up as a refurbishment. Changing seat moquette pattern, painting handrails a different colour, twiddling with seating layout to add or subtract disabled and or luggage space, painting the things in new livery, is not refurbishment, most of it is overhaul that has to be done anyway. But because the word refurbishment is used by the TOC, expectations become high towards step changes. Too high. Refurbish / refresh / rebuild / overhaul all get muddled - they mean different things to different TOC or RoSCo at different times depending on what they want to say at the time. I can think of certain "refreshes" by one TOC on one type of EMU that were more extensive than "refurbishments" on the same class but different TOC.
This. We've even got to the stage of having an "external refurbishment". That means a repaint.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,188
WAGN’s 317/2 to 317/6 was genuinely transformational, as were the various 1990s LU jobs. Same for the 411s. Completely agree that new seat covers and a few painted grab poles is barely a transformation.
However, those needed that kind of transformation at the time it happened. The 376s are people movers that aren't really broken. Apart from air conditioning and potentially a toilet, what about a 376 getting some new seat covers doesn't match the specification they would have under a more comprehensive refurbishment? They aren't perfect but it isn't obvious to me that a new build would be that different.
 

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,008
Location
London
Possibly. One thing I don't think has been mentioned is that the 376s have hopper windows which don't lock. If aircon was to be fitted these would need to be either permanently sealed shut or have locks fitted which could only be opened by staff in the event of the aircon failing. Given the propensity of anti-social behaviour on the routes the units operate, it wouldn't surprise me to see those windows being forced open quite frequently. You could of course remove the windows entirely and replace with a one-piece pane, but that's another thing that costs money.
The hoppers on the Turbos on the North Downs line are only secured with a carriage-bell-heater key - which means you can open them with a house key!

Chiltern, as @Route115? mentioned, also fitted air con to their 165s but also replaced all the windows to remove the hoppers. So presumably that could have been done if the 376s had air con added.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,493
It was stated earlier in the thread that power requirements are fine if air con fitted given recent upgrades.

Unlike some stock mentioned, the 376 is far easier to include air con given same basic unit as 378 etc.

The argument they stop often so no air con needed was rubbish in 2004 and proven to be rubbish since.

As for toilets at stations as the tube and other TOCs have them, that may be so but are there many TOCs in the south east with as few staff as Southeastern in London? Go take a trip to Hayes or any Dartford line at 8pm and see the staffing levels.

Barely staffed stations and they mostly become staffless after about 7pm, so the few toilets there are get locked up. Far worse in my experience than SWR, Southern, LU, c2c etc.

They won't get a decent upgrade as Southeastern inner services have been the bast*rd child for many years.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
20,706
Location
West of Andover
Having a toilet on a train is one thing. Having that toilet remain in use throughout the day is the challenge, especially on those units which are out all day and don't have long at Charing Cross/Cannon Street between services.

I've lost count at the times I've boarded a 465 only to find the loo out of use, probably due to running out of water.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,257
Location
St Albans
Having a toilet on a train is one thing. Having that toilet remain in use throughout the day is the challenge, especially on those units which are out all day and don't have long at Charing Cross/Cannon Street between services.

I've lost count at the times I've boarded a 465 only to find the loo out of use, probably due to running out of water.
Or the retention tank being full.
 

LUYMun

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2018
Messages
1,195
Location
Cancelled
Having a toilet on a train is one thing. Having that toilet remain in use throughout the day is the challenge, especially on those units which are out all day and don't have long at Charing Cross/Cannon Street between services.

I've lost count at the times I've boarded a 465 only to find the loo out of use, probably due to running out of water.
Or the added possibility of misusers hiding in toilets to evade paying the fare.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top