Snow1964
Established Member
or Christmas 2019, Christmas 2020, or Christmas 2021Dear Santa...all I want for Christmas is a 701 in service.I didn't get this last year so could you please try harder ?
or Christmas 2019, Christmas 2020, or Christmas 2021Dear Santa...all I want for Christmas is a 701 in service.I didn't get this last year so could you please try harder ?
Yep. As far as I am aware no training has started for mainline drivers or guards. As with drivers, there are some guards managers/trainers trained which will allow a limited initial service to run.I'm sure that will soon be denied on this thread.![]()
Makes sense, thanks.Yep. As far as I am aware no training has started for mainline drivers or guards. As with drivers, there are some guards managers/trainers trained which will allow a limited initial service to run.
This would be reminiscent of South Western Trains running a single 707 prior to South Western Railway taking over, so that SWT did achieve it during their franchise.No, it was in jest! Wouldn't put it past SWR to run one diagram that day though.
Indeed. From memory it was one Reading and a couple of Weybridges, fulfilling contractual requirements just before SWR took over. The 707s then started entering service properly a few weeks later.This would be reminiscent of South Western Trains running a single 707 prior to South Western Railway taking over, so that SWT did achieve it during their franchise.
It was a single random service from Brentford to Ascot wasn't it?Indeed. From memory it was one Reading and a couple of Weybridges, fulfilling contractual requirements just before SWR took over. The 707s then started entering service properly a few weeks later.
Why would SWR not simply switch an existing diagram over to 701 operation and then add further diagrams as more staff are trained, in a similar way to what LNWR has started doing this month with the 730 trains?It was a single random service from Brentford to Ascot wasn't it?
I guess we could see something similar for the 701's whenever they can finally get one for for service.
I would expect SWR would want maximum publicity to say, look these brand new trains in are use.It was a single random service from Brentford to Ascot wasn't it?
I guess we could see something similar for the 701's whenever they can finally get one for for service.
To go with the maximum embarrassment that they're only four years late?I would expect SWR would want maximum publicity to say, look these brand new trains in are use.
I'm not sure finally getting ONE unit out working over four years late is something to shout about.I would expect SWR would want maximum publicity to say, look these brand new trains in are use.
I would expect SWR would want maximum publicity to say, look these brand new trains in are use.
Because they're not in a position to do that yet, but there does seem to be some determination to have at least one unit in service this year.Why would SWR not simply switch an existing diagram over to 701 operation and then add further diagrams as more staff are trained, in a similar way to what LNWR has started doing this month with the 730 trains?
Switching a single rolling stock diagram over to class 701 operation would be simple, but each rolling stock diagram will be resourced by multiple drivers and guards from different depots. So widespread traincrew familiarity with the stock would be a pre-requisite, unless a special set of traincrew diagrams were produced to resource the single class 701 rolling stock diagram. This is actually no small task because the knock-on effects would be significant.Why would SWR not simply switch an existing diagram over to 701 operation and then add further diagrams as more staff are trained, in a similar way to what LNWR has started doing this month with the 730 trains?
They wouldn't be running on the main line if they weren't safe. Whether they are fully compliant and reliable is probably the underlying reason.The straightforward response would surely be that safe operation needs to be established.
It was a single Waterloo to Reading return, running as an extra just behind a normal scheduled service so very few passengers actually used it. I remember seeing it at Martins Heron. I also seem to remember what was probably the last 701 to pass through there way back before Covid with the suggestion it would be in service in the matter of weeks!It was a single random service from Brentford to Ascot wasn't it?
I guess we could see something similar for the 701's whenever they can finally get one for for service.
It was a single random service from Brentford to Ascot wasn't it?
It was a single Waterloo to Reading return, running as an extra just behind a normal scheduled service so very few passengers actually used it. I remember seeing it at Martins Heron.
It did more than that. Certainly went to Reading twice, then a Staines to Weybridge before returning ECS to Wimbledon.It was a single Waterloo to Reading return, running as an extra just behind a normal scheduled service so very few passengers actually used it. I remember seeing it at Martins Heron. I also seem to remember what was probably the last 701 to pass through there way back before Covid with the suggestion it would be in service in the matter of weeks!
I would hope that the decision as to whether they are fit for service is made by the relevant and appropriate committees and authorities, not by local ASLEF depots.
Staines to Feltham sounds most realistic, path it just after the Windsor to give time to empty it at feltham and into feltham yard without blocking other services. Nice tick in the boxMy money would be on Staines to Feltham (or v/v). Out of the depot, quick run, reverse and back to the depot with a promise of a full entry to service in the new year (just don't ask them to specify which new year).
Method of operation has been agreed for well over 2 and a half years now. If SWR want to second guess and operate it some other way then they need to get on with it and decide alreadyWho knows ? I wonder when this saga will end and the trains actually carry passengers. This does very much appear to be an operator project and look what has happened elsewhere.OK,services are still running,but using the stock the 701s were meant to replace.It all comes down to the cab size ,and who opens and closes the doors does it not ? Where is the Guiding Mind when one is needed?
Method of working is changing and ASLEF / RMT have been in discussions with SWR. It has pretty much been confirmed as driver open guard close. With CD/RA being used at Waterloo and Reading.Method of operation has been agreed for well over 2 and a half years now. If SWR want to second guess and operate it some other way then they need to get on with it and decide already
Most likely it will be Staines-Windsor. You have a spare platform at Windsor in case something goes wrong and it won't be blocking the line into waterloo from StainesStaines to Feltham sounds most realistic, path it just after the Windsor to give time to empty it at feltham and into feltham yard without blocking other services. Nice tick in the box
And then begins the full and standing can of worms. All the 5 car splits will have to run on the Windsor/reading and hounslow diagrams due to short platforms, CCTV monitors also installed further down the platform to plan for this eventuality.Method of working is changing and ASLEF / RMT have been in discussions with SWR. It has pretty much been confirmed as driver open guard close. With CD/RA being used at Waterloo and Reading.
Most likely it will be Staines-Windsor. You have a spare platform at Windsor in case something goes wrong and it won't be blocking the line into waterloo from Staines
What & when were these tests ?but I guess trap and drag tests proving unsuitable cameras has forced the companies hand...
there are GOP's in the same positions as on a 707s so it doesn't matter if its a 5 or 10 car unit running on those lines. The only problem will be when they're full and standing and the guard has no where to go.And then begins the full and standing can of worms. All the 5 car splits will have to run on the Windsor/reading and hounslow diagrams due to short platforms, CCTV monitors also installed further down the platform to plan for this eventuality.
These trains weren't designed to have a guard on board nevermind closing the doors, but I guess trap and drag tests proving unsuitable cameras has forced the companies hand...
I've been informed whether reliably or not that it failed those tests. I imagine a train that is DOO capable would have to do and pass these tests to be approved.What & when were these tests ?