Thunderer
Member
I remember back in 2012 reading the 80 page plus full technical specification document for the IEP project and thinking back then this train is too reliant on computers and too complicated and intricate, giving scope for failures like this. I was recently delayed in Swansea because one 800 unit would not couple up with another (computer issue) another delay at Swansea when the exterior doors would not close on one 800 unit (25 minute delay), they eventually closed. For me, Its a sub-standard replacement for the HST and passenger comfort has been sacrificed (awful seats and no buffet car). I've travelled on them a lot since last October, and taking my enthusiasts cap off and looking at it from a Passenger point of view, it is a step backwards from the HST. Even 1st class is not very comfortable. One other thing I noticed when travelling over 100mph is an awful lot of lateral movement and the ride quality gets poorer. All that money spent on complex bi-mode trains that are less superior to the 40 year old plus trains they are replacing. The whole IEP project and DFT involvement has been an expensive disaster, and us poor GWR passengers will have to put up with them for the next few decades.