• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 802 failure between Exeter and Tiverton Parkway requiring evacuation (13/09)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thunderer

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2013
Messages
430
Location
South Wales
I remember back in 2012 reading the 80 page plus full technical specification document for the IEP project and thinking back then this train is too reliant on computers and too complicated and intricate, giving scope for failures like this. I was recently delayed in Swansea because one 800 unit would not couple up with another (computer issue) another delay at Swansea when the exterior doors would not close on one 800 unit (25 minute delay), they eventually closed. For me, Its a sub-standard replacement for the HST and passenger comfort has been sacrificed (awful seats and no buffet car). I've travelled on them a lot since last October, and taking my enthusiasts cap off and looking at it from a Passenger point of view, it is a step backwards from the HST. Even 1st class is not very comfortable. One other thing I noticed when travelling over 100mph is an awful lot of lateral movement and the ride quality gets poorer. All that money spent on complex bi-mode trains that are less superior to the 40 year old plus trains they are replacing. The whole IEP project and DFT involvement has been an expensive disaster, and us poor GWR passengers will have to put up with them for the next few decades.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Jensen

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2016
Messages
20
Location
Oxfordshire
Is it a similar case to the space race when the US spent a lot of US dollars attempting to design a pen that would work in zero gravity and the Russians used a pencil? Technology advances are brilliant but how many of us used all the features offered on the later spec VHS recorders? We just wanted a timer and a record feature. All we want is a train that works.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,739
Is it a similar case to the space race when the US spent a lot of US dollars attempting to design a pen that would work in zero gravity and the Russians used a pencil? Technology advances are brilliant but how many of us used all the features offered on the later spec VHS recorders? We just wanted a timer and a record feature. All we want is a train that works.

Pencils are a really bad idea in space because if you sharpen them the graphite andw ood chippings float around and can get into your eyes and such.

What actually happened was the Russians just bought biros in huge numbers when they were released into civilian use.
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
Is it a similar case to the space race when the US spent a lot of US dollars attempting to design a pen that would work in zero gravity and the Russians used a pencil? Technology advances are brilliant but how many of us used all the features offered on the later spec VHS recorders? We just wanted a timer and a record feature. All we want is a train that works.

The pen thing is a bit of an urban myth. A company did invent a pen as pencils are dangerous in space (think the lead snapping and a tiny bit getting into a circuit). It used pressure to force the ink out as gravity fed ballpoints would not work.
IrishRail had the right idea with the 2900 and ICR fleets.

It was made clear that no unnecessary electronics/computers were to be used as it was just another thing to go wrong.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,092
There has clearly been no advance since a similar 6-hour delay to an HST on the same line, with the same TOC management, at Pewsey 5 years ago

https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/fgw-train-stranded-at-pewsey.87761/

It seems it's not so much the technical characteristics of the train so much as the procedures that get followed. Notably that prior thread was full of people stating "Lessons will be learned". Which never happened.
 
Last edited:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
There has clearly been no advance since a similar 6-hour delay to an HST on the same line, with the same TOC management, at Pewsey 5 years ago

I was thinking I could remember a similar farce involving an HST. But then I realised I must be mistaken as HSTs are perfect and never suffer failures and certainly not of this magnitude.
 

lord rathmore

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2012
Messages
92
Location
suffolk
I was thinking I could remember a similar farce involving an HST. But then I realised I must be mistaken as HSTs are perfect and never suffer failures and certainly not of this magnitude.

You are right mate. Rose-tinted glasses about the perfect trains of yesterday pervades railway discussions.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,355
There was a London to Penzance train stranded outside St Erth for several hours only a few weeks ago; the Night Riviera sleeper train has been Stranded for 3+ hours on multiple occasions in the past year.
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,351
Let's not forget the Atmospheric Railway or IKBs early attempts at traction engineering!
 

cf111

Established Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,348
I was thinking I could remember a similar farce involving an HST. But then I realised I must be mistaken as HSTs are perfect and never suffer failures and certainly not of this magnitude.
And if anything did go wrong, which obviously it never would, all the passengers would be able to stretch out in their armchair-esque seats while being served gourmet food from the restaurant car.
 

D1009

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2012
Messages
3,166
Location
Stoke Gifford
From what we know about the incident, is it the case that the whole thing was a "computer says no", and there was no actual mechanical failure? Computer saying no meaning that it effectively adopted the nuclear option, which was to drop the brake and resist any attempts to rectify it.
 

221129

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2011
Messages
6,520
Location
Sunny Scotland
From what we know about the incident, is it the case that the whole thing was a "computer says no", and there was no actual mechanical failure? Computer saying no meaning that it effectively adopted the nuclear option, which was to drop the brake and resist any attempts to rectify it.
The initial fault was mechanical.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
1,404
Location
London
One other thing I noticed when travelling over 100mph is an awful lot of lateral movement and the ride quality gets poorer.

Just to highlight this point as I've noticed this a lot recently. I spend quite a bit of time heading to meetings in Swindon / Bristol / Newport from London and it's really noticeable. Is it a weight thing maybe, the IETs are lighter than HSTs so they get bumped around a bit more? First world problems, and all that jazz, but it's quite distracting when trying to work on a laptop.
 

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
Incorrectly fitted pipework from the factory apparently so no not an easy fix exactly....
Yeah but obviously if it were a good old British built train with no computers that wouldn't have happened and even when it did the driver could've easily refitted the pipework!

(/s, for the sarcasm impaired)
 

Thunderer

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2013
Messages
430
Location
South Wales
Just to highlight this point as I've noticed this a lot recently. I spend quite a bit of time heading to meetings in Swindon / Bristol / Newport from London and it's really noticeable. Is it a weight thing maybe, the IETs are lighter than HSTs so they get bumped around a bit more? First world problems, and all that jazz, but it's quite distracting when trying to work on a laptop.
Thanks, I thought it was just me noticing this ha! One ride I had back from Reading in August was particularly bad between Reading and Bristol Parkway..I think the unit was 800012. At one point before Chipping Sodbury tunnel the sudden lateral movement was so bad it caused me to move left in my seat and bang my elbow on the window ledge. Not good!
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,903
Just to highlight this point as I've noticed this a lot recently. I spend quite a bit of time heading to meetings in Swindon / Bristol / Newport from London and it's really noticeable. Is it a weight thing maybe, the IETs are lighter than HSTs so they get bumped around a bit more? First world problems, and all that jazz, but it's quite distracting when trying to work on a laptop.

Thanks, I thought it was just me noticing this ha! One ride I had back from Reading in August was particularly bad between Reading and Bristol Parkway..I think the unit was 800012. At one point before Chipping Sodbury tunnel the sudden lateral movement was so bad it caused me to move left in my seat and bang my elbow on the window ledge. Not good!
I noticed if the other week between Swindon and Didcot. It happened about 3 times.
 

Thunderer

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2013
Messages
430
Location
South Wales
I noticed if the other week between Swindon and Didcot. It happened about 3 times.
Im wondering if its less noticable on an 800/3 (one train) as opposed to 2 x 800's joined together? Just a Theory? I will have to take a trip on an 800/3 up to Reading and back too see if its the same.
 

CMRail

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2018
Messages
163
Location
Gloucester
Really? So no one at GWR or Hitachi could give two hoots about what happened and they are all studiously ignoring it (sarcasm alert).



I'm not at all surprised, given the way some posters here and on the GW Passengers' Forum jump on any issue with an IET, big or small.

Whereas HSTs/Class 91s/anything else on wheels worked perfectly straight out of the box and has done ever since... (sarcasm alert)

In the same way that nothing ever goes wrong on Chiltern, such as cancellations due to crew shortages (more last weekend) or this morning's complete signalling failure south of Gerrards Cross, which is playing merry hell with services at Marylebone right now.

I have to agree with most that is written in the message, people are obsessed with moaningn about these trains. God knows how many times the seats have been mentioned, buffets and the fact that the HST is on average 3mph faster up hills o_O (we should send the IETs back, appalling.)

If the project went to plan right now most of the 125 sections would have been nearing electrification completion, however that is not the case and nor will it be for at least half a decade.

The interior is changeable. I put money on the interior being refurbished in 4 or 5 years time and the seats being changed sooner. The train is not perfect and it has its issues, most are fixable or just teething problems just like the HST.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,231
If the electrification project had met the original expectations in 2009, everything, including Cardiff-Swansea, would have been wired by last year.

The Great Western route will be electrified from London to Bristol, Cardiff and Swansea by 2017, along with the lines to Oxford and Newbury, at a cost of £1bn.

https://www.railwaygazette.com/news...rification-planning-to-start-immediately.html

We have yet to hear what will happen in Control Period 6, which starts in April next year, so more wires could very well be in place long before 2024. With Oxford now resignalled, there is nothing standing in the way of cracking straight on with Didcot-Oxford if the funds are there.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I'm assuming the 'Bimodes negate the need for electrification' view is still currently being held by the DfT? I do wonder if that may scupper funding for any future proposals in areas where Bimode stock operates.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,231
So long as the wires end at Didcot, the 387s cannot get anywhere near Oxford, which I doubt even the DfT mandarins can argue is a desirable state of affairs in the long term, especially if the Government is supposedly serious about reducing diesel emissions in our cities. Same goes for Bristol.

And hopefully the current Transport Secretary will put be out out to grass soon, saving Britain from more of the kind of thing detailed in this article from the Guardian (written by David Cameron's former speechwriter) only yesterday.

With his history of bumbling ministerial ineptitude, the sooner Chris Grayling’s cabinet career hits the buffers the better

Imagine you were running a business and one of your senior managers left a trail of disaster in their wake. First, you would investigate to see what had gone wrong in each case. And then, if you found the same person was responsible for repeated failures, you might either dismiss them or, if feeling generous, put them in charge of the paper clips. But as the hapless career of Chris Grayling proves, they do things differently in government.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/20/railways-chris-grayling-cabinet-career
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Agreed, they really should sort Oxford out, but the political discussion (I realise it was me that started it, probably better for another thread) - if not by now, then probably never. Wait until he gets bored of the role I suppose...
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
I think this thread has now run its course. There are other threads already in existence to discuss more wider issues with the trains themselves or with the electrification programme. Therefore this thread is locked. If anyone has anything to substantial and new to add to the original topic of this thread then please feel free to report this post and consideration will be given to reopening the thread.

Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top