Helvellyn
Established Member
- Joined
- 28 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 2,013
Could have had a Mk 3C which might have looked like the Irish Mk 3s with a Mk 3B style interior in First and possibly a Class 442 style interior in Standard.I don’t believe the old “badger” failed because it was a bad loco, but rather because it was overtaken by a better idea which later became the Mk4+Cl91 IC225 formation. That these trains never fulfilled its design potential (140mph and tilt) makes one wonder if the original ECML proposal of Mk3+Cl89 wouldn’t have delivered the same results at a lower cost. We shall never know.