• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Controversial railway opinions (without a firm foundation in logic..)

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,549
My God, when did they imagine that they did have the worlds best passenger service ?
Generally one hears this claim about the interwar period - never with any information about how "best" is determined. Looking at old timetables it certainly wasn't the best for speed or frequency...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,125
Location
Yorks
Generally one hears this claim about the interwar period - never with any information about how "best" is determined. Looking at old timetables it certainly wasn't the best for speed or frequency...

Quite.

One can imagine our system being the best for the time.
 

hux385

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2023
Messages
81
Location
Edinburgh
So making them walk from Victoria to Piccadilly will improve connections?
Could they not change at Stockport? Surely being re-routed to Victoria would provide better connections from Sheffield to the wider North West?
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,699
Location
Wales
Could they not change at Stockport? Surely being re-routed to Victoria would provide better connections from Sheffield to the wider North West?
Not a lot of use if their destination isn't served from Stockport
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,185
So making them walk from Victoria to Piccadilly will improve connections?
It's not them missing the connections usually, it's all the other services using Castlefield that get delayed and then (if you're lucky enough to only be delayed a couple mins by it), you have to leg it to the main station down that narrow corridor connecting 13/14 to it, always rammed with people, like a rat up a pipe.
 

Turtle

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2013
Messages
300
The problem that many people have is confusing the spellings of 'gauge' and 'guard'....or is it 'guage' and 'gaurd' ?
Was it not George Bernard Shaw who came up with the word "ghoti", pronounced "fish", to illustrate the illogicallity of English spelling:-
gh pronounced f ( as in couGH)
i pronounced i (as in wOmen)
ti pronounced sh (as in sta TI on)
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,185
Greggs sell awful, bland food. Give the food franchise to a Wigan bakery such as Greenhalgh's
One based on county would be amusing.
Greenhalgh's in Lancs, Martins in GM, Warings in Berks, Reeves in Wilts, Wenzels in Bucks etc.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,201
Greggs offer such delicious and nourishing food that a sausage roll (meat or vegan depending on preference) should be given free to every passenger.
When you're tired and hungry after a long journey, the sausage roll is lying there invitingly all by itself and it's just a quid....
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
2,968
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
Withdraw duplicated services as per Beeching. For example all train services from Leeds to Sheffield should be routed via Fitzwilliam (on the ex-GN route) and passenger trains withdrawn between Barnsley, Wakefield Kirkgate and Castleford, with all stations between Barnsley and Castleford closed.
 

Thirteen

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,159
Location
London
When you're tired and hungry after a long journey, the sausage roll is lying there invitingly all by itself and it's just a quid....
Greggs' food and drinks offering isn't great but I get free hot drinks or free sausage rolls on O2 Priority and if it's free, why not go for it!
 

Bartsimho

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2023
Messages
569
Location
Chesterfield
Greggs is good enough food at a good enough price. I know what I can get and I know the quality will be the same wherever I get it from. That consistency sells.
 

ar10642

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2015
Messages
576
My job title would only be few grand less in Manchester, it's not as dramatic as people think (outside of finance). The only reason I really stay here is family.

It looks like I could *potentially* earn about the same as I am in Cambridge in Manchester instead, but there are fewer jobs and rents in Greater Manchester surprisingly don't look a lot better than here in Sussex. I don't know anyone there, have no connection to the area at all and would mean using hotels to see family.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,219
Withdraw duplicated services as per Beeching. For example all train services from Leeds to Sheffield should be routed via Fitzwilliam (on the ex-GN route) and passenger trains withdrawn between Barnsley, Wakefield Kirkgate and Castleford, with all stations between Barnsley and Castleford closed.
Likewise the WCML from London to Scotland duplicates the ECML so one of those routes is unnecessary and should be closed down.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,549
Likewise the WCML from London to Scotland duplicates the ECML so one of those routes is unnecessary and should be closed down.
You joke, but Beeching genuinely thought that and suggests closing the ECML from Newcastle to Edinburgh!
 

OLJR

Member
Joined
20 Apr 2011
Messages
189
Location
Pimlico
LNER Perks is a much better programme than either East Coast Rewards or GNER Time because it rewards the occasional traveller…
 

Bartsimho

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2023
Messages
569
Location
Chesterfield
Likewise the WCML from London to Scotland duplicates the ECML so one of those routes is unnecessary and should be closed down.
While I know this is a joke having the Primary London-Glasgow services being from Kings Cross and the ECML could be good if the WCML services were all based around the intermediate traffic so Euston-Birmingham-Crewe-Warrington-Preston-Carlisle-Carstairs-Glasgow
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,490
You joke, but Beeching genuinely thought that and suggests closing the ECML from Newcastle to Edinburgh!
Not so according to the report. He did propose closing all the local stations between Berwick and Edinburgh, but the through main line was to stay open. He also proposed closure of a number of small stations in Northumberland, leaving it broadly as it is today, except he didn’t propose closure of the Alnwick branch, that came quite a few years later.

It was the Serpell report in 1983 that suggested closing the ECML north of Newcastle.
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
1,979
Location
Northampton
It was the Serpell report in 1983 that suggested closing the ECML north of Newcastle.

The government at the time seemed to be really anti-rail - possibly the 1982 ASLEF all-out strike hadn't helped. As well as Serpell (or possibly part of it - I can't recall) there was the Marylebone Coach-way plan which I recall would enable the total closure of both West and East Coast routes. B.R., having survived Beeching and seen some investment seemed to be on another Government-led death spiral. And the next year, the N.U.M. strike severely reduced Railfreight revenue.

Dark depressing days if you worked for B.R and liked trains.
 

Mogz

Member
Joined
20 May 2019
Messages
445
Splitting up services is the root of all evil! I actually love having ridiculously long train services that no-one would sensibly use end to end. I'm thinking Liverpool-Norwich or Aberdeen-Penzance to name a couple which currently exist.

In fact, we should have more super-long regional expresses! How about...
● Holyhead-Crewe-Derby-Lincoln
● Carmarthen-Birmingham-York-Sunderland
● Blackpool North-Brighouse-Doncaster-Spalding-Peterborough
●Oban-Glasgow QS LL-Edinburgh-Newcastle

There is zero logic to these services, but they would be fun!
Yes!

Just….yes!!!
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,549
Not so according to the report. He did propose closing all the local stations between Berwick and Edinburgh, but the through main line was to stay open.
Nope, he proposed closure of Newcastle-Edinburgh in the less well-known Development of the Major Railway Trunk Routes.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,961
Location
Sunny South Lancs
The government at the time seemed to be really anti-rail - possibly the 1982 ASLEF all-out strike hadn't helped. As well as Serpell (or possibly part of it - I can't recall) there was the Marylebone Coach-way plan which I recall would enable the total closure of both West and East Coast routes. B.R., having survived Beeching and seen some investment seemed to be on another Government-led death spiral. And the next year, the N.U.M. strike severely reduced Railfreight revenue.

Dark depressing days if you worked for B.R and liked trains.
While the factors causing so much negativity are much as you describe I would suggest that the "anti" feeling was as much from senior civil servants in the appropriate departments (Treasury and Transport) as from elected representatives. For all that many vilify Thatcher in the end, despite her personal disinterest in railways, she decided that BR was best left alone. The mess of privatisation was more due to Major's determination to leave a political legacy even to the extent of ignoring his own advisors on the best way to proceed.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,125
Location
Yorks
Withdraw duplicated services as per Beeching. For example all train services from Leeds to Sheffield should be routed via Fitzwilliam (on the ex-GN route) and passenger trains withdrawn between Barnsley, Wakefield Kirkgate and Castleford, with all stations between Barnsley and Castleford closed.

Would Barnsley still havea through service to Leeds ?
Not so according to the report. He did propose closing all the local stations between Berwick and Edinburgh, but the through main line was to stay open. He also proposed closure of a number of small stations in Northumberland, leaving it broadly as it is today, except he didn’t propose closure of the Alnwick branch, that came quite a few years later.

It was the Serpell report in 1983 that suggested closing the ECML north of Newcastle.

Actually, he did suggest it (along with Marylebone - Banbury) in his 1982 TV interview (which is on Youtube somewhere). He looks odd without the moustache !
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
1,979
Location
Northampton
While the factors causing so much negativity are much as you describe I would suggest that the "anti" feeling was as much from senior civil servants in the appropriate departments (Treasury and Transport) as from elected representatives. For all that many vilify Thatcher in the end, despite her personal disinterest in railways, she decided that BR was best left alone. The mess of privatisation was more due to Major's determination to leave a political legacy even to the extent of ignoring his own advisors on the best way to proceed.

You may well be right, but...

The impression I gained at the time (possibly from frank remarks made at the time by politicians) was that one of the motives behind Thatcher's liberalisation of coach licensing (remember British Coachways?) was that a privately owned express coach network would not only wipe out the (nationalised) National Express network but also have a very destructive effect on British Rail's passenger business, leaving it so weakened as to be easily disposed of. In other words, I think she did 'leave B.R. alone' - but left it to die! For example, I remember immediately after de-reg that there well over a hundred commuter road coaches running betweenLuton/Dunstable and London daily - although the dispute about the original Bedford-St Pancras units (the 317s) and the resulting unreliability of the service was also a factor. But it didn't work long term, except some of the successful TOC franchise bidders were bus companies.

An erstwhile colleague* had been, before I worked for him, the Chairman's bag carrier and purchaser of sandwiches( etc.!) for breaks, during the 1982 ASLEF flexible rostering strike negotiations. He was clear that it was Thatcher's direct orders that B.R. must not concede anything at all to the drivers. However, she then suddenly became aware of the grievous effect on the economy of no-one being able to get into City offices, so issued a very swift 'get them back to work NOW' instruction. Of course, to do this instantly could only be achieved by total capitulation. Result; great bitterness by BR management that the opportunity for any negotiation was thrown away by Thatcher. And she certainly did a U turn!

*the manager I mentioned was one of the best Inworked for, and soon went on to greater things. He became MD of Merseyrail but very sadly died at a very early age about 25 years ago of a medical condition that was, I think, congenital.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,344
However, she then suddenly became aware of the grievous effect on the economy of no-one being able to get into City offices, so issued a very swift 'get them back to work NOW' instruction

If only some modern politicians could also understand that public transport is good for the economy.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,961
Location
Sunny South Lancs
You may well be right, but...

The impression I gained at the time (possibly from frank remarks made at the time by politicians) was that one of the motives behind Thatcher's liberalisation of coach licensing (remember British Coachways?) was that a privately owned express coach network would not only wipe out the (nationalised) National Express network but also have a very destructive effect on British Rail's passenger business, leaving it so weakened as to be easily disposed of. In other words, I think she did 'leave B.R. alone' - but left it to die! For example, I remember immediately after de-reg that there well over a hundred commuter road coaches running betweenLuton/Dunstable and London daily - although the dispute about the original Bedford-St Pancras units (the 317s) and the resulting unreliability of the service was also a factor. But it didn't work long term, except some of the successful TOC franchise bidders were bus companies.
This was always deluded thinking of the highest order and only absolute ideologues could ever come up with it. Where are all those coach services now?
 

Top