• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Creation of class 230 DEMUs from ex-LU D78s by Vivarail

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HLE

Established Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
1,405
The drivetrain isn't the same. Vivarail has been clear that the prototype used the original dc motors from the LU days and the later trains use ac motors with all the variable frequency variable voltage inverters.

I stand corrected! Still wouldn't make much of a difference, if any, to the drivers, 1 day conversion at the absolute most
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,372
If it's anything like the IT industry the customer (TOCs in this case) will be at a fair bit of fault - in IT there is invariably pressure from customers to release things quicker, and the thing they ask us to cut (because it takes time including their own) is testing. We of course strongly advise against this, but in the end they're paying the bills.
even in the IT industry they'll have a 95% working version for offical release, and then spend the next 6 months doing constant BIOS and firmware updates to get it properly stable.
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,372
I suspect the first four or five trucks of a new design had a few bugs to iron out too. But those would have been driven to death on a test track and probably scrapped without ever earning any revenue. You can afford that if your production run will be a few thousand.
obviously not driven to death,as I was on one of the first 230's in service(23rd april), and one of the project managers on the train was wondering why the doors hadn't been tested during acceptance.

not really complaining about the train here as such, but the project manager has a point.
All of this stuff should be utterly thrashed during acceptance testing.It's supposed to be a worst case scenario that picks up faults,if they are likely to happen.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,932
Location
Nottingham
obviously not driven to death,as I was on one of the first 230's in service(23rd april), and one of the project managers on the train was wondering why the doors hadn't been tested during acceptance.

not really complaining about the train here as such, but the project manager has a point.
All of this stuff should be utterly thrashed during acceptance testing.It's supposed to be a worst case scenario that picks up faults,if they are likely to happen.
I was meaning the prototypes of a new truck design would be driven to death. The manufacturers of the 230s, like most other trains, don't have the luxury of such testing to destruction so have to iron the bugs out in passenger service.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I was meaning the prototypes of a new truck design would be driven to death. The manufacturers of the 230s, like most other trains, don't have the luxury of such testing to destruction so have to iron the bugs out in passenger service.
I would argue that the 230s are one of very few new fleet introductions where they actually did. They have loads of spare vehicles they can use as testbeds.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,310
Location
Fenny Stratford
Why does it take a train 3 months - 2 years to get all the niggles out, but Volvo can pump out new truck after new truck without issue year after year? I’m sure this has been asked and expanded on countless times. But all I see is shoddy trains being commissioned in a rushed fashion and it’s the fare paying passengers that have to suffer.

because, rather obviously, when Volvo build a new lorry they are not just building 3. They are building 300k. They also aren't building a lorry for the first time and they aren't working out of a shed in a field somewhere. They tend to improve models and engines and build on an existing and proven base. Thye also have many more people working in R&D, test, design, manufacture etc and much more time and money to spend on these things. Also when it comes to test they have test tracks (like the one at Millbrook) where the vehicles can be driven to destruction along with high tech simulation facilities to test various conditions. I doubt vivarail have those

What you are trying to do is compare the fist class 230 with the 4 millionth volvo truck. What was the first vovlo truck like?

obviously not driven to death,as I was on one of the first 230's in service(23rd april), and one of the project managers on the train was wondering why the doors hadn't been tested during acceptance.

They did test the doors. I saw them do so at my station. The problem is the tests probably wont replicate service use.
 
Last edited:

zn1

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
435
Now this small fleet is in its squadron service on the branch, the units are now experiencing a different sort of operation, In testing you can only do so much to "break " them and repair them, you cannot simulate punters leaning on doors, jumping on seats etc...the only way you can bed a rail fleet in is by dumping them in to revenue traffic, the drivers will operate differently, guards working them, passengers kicking them around and most important, the steelwork below the dear old track itself will want to punish a train. The only way to really break in any Unit, locomotive or wagon is get it out there, fill em up, and let the crews, passengers and steel itself do the business, The power unit and power will be working twice, three times as hard...this is all common sense...for a small fleet in traffic, these issues will occur and will get sorted...I recall vividly the class 90s being a very bad bunch of ladies, to the point when at Ilford open day The BREL Engineers who had bought down the DVT direct from Works told all staff officially WE DO NOT CALL THE 90S SKODAS OK......in the end the 90s began to behave, once they understood the reality of operation..all fleets behave like this...they have to learn in the same way all animals do...call me a crackpot....;please
 

supervc-10

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2012
Messages
702
^^This.

It's impossible to test everything perfectly. In any machine, there will be new and interesting ways that people treat them badly which causes issues. Never understand the ability of the general public to behave like idiots!

In aviation, early production aircraft will have teething issues and will be sold at lower prices to the launch customers, offsetting the worse reliability, fuel burn, and capabilities of those early aircraft. I would expect that similar issues will crop up in the rail industry too.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
In aviation, early production aircraft will have teething issues and will be sold at lower prices to the launch customers, offsetting the worse reliability, fuel burn, and capabilities of those early aircraft. I would expect that similar issues will crop up in the rail industry too.

While this will be commercial in confidence so we will never find out, I would be surprised if LNR hadn't, along those lines, got a very good deal on the 230s as the launch customer. Buy two get one free? They certainly need the third one... :)
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,360
Location
East Midlands
I wonder if this week's forecasted heatwave will have any detrimental operational problems on those Class 230 units in current service this week.

It's supposed to peak at 34C on Thursday in Bedford and Bletchley.

Going a bit off-topic, but is that likely to be speed restriction territory for some of the network?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
good effort - there are some crew related cancellations this evening now!

And it's all over the place again...one diagram offset perfectly 30 minutes from where it should be due to a unit failure. Sorry to anyone I jinxed!

Still, there are worse places to sit than Apsley Guise at sunset. Surprisingly quiet for the M1 being only a kilometre away.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190722_193349.jpg
    IMG_20190722_193349.jpg
    4 MB · Views: 85
  • IMG_20190722_194536.jpg
    IMG_20190722_194536.jpg
    4.9 MB · Views: 77

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
005 doing the honours. Bog out of order again. Guard working from back cab which seems to be mitigating the slow door issue.

Looks like there may have been a mod to speed up the open button being enabled.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Is that on the working unit? What did the noise sound like, just a power pack shutting down or anything more serious? :P

Sounded like a diesel engine stopping with the inevitable rattle at the end, followed by a couple of restart attempts.

There are two "working", the cancellations are staff related at present.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Was on 230005 earlier for my first try of these units - on time at the time (1653 off Bletchley to Bedford). Did seem to be sluggish...then again it's my first timr using them!
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Was on 230005 earlier for my first try of these units - on time at the time (1653 off Bletchley to Bedford). Did seem to be sluggish...then again it's my first timr using them!
The MTIN of the actual units aside, it does seem from anecdotes on here that 2 or 3 engines is about as many as they seem able to achieve at once. I wonder what sort of mileage they're getting out of each engine? That presumably is still in 3 figures at this stage. Hopefully more than 2!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Was on 230005 earlier for my first try of these units - on time at the time (1653 off Bletchley to Bedford). Did seem to be sluggish...then again it's my first timr using them!

I think we are on two. With 4 performance is the same as they were as Tube trains.

Might as well add here... I can confirm the door release delay issue has been resolved, the buttons are now enabled as soon as the open buttons are pressed by the guard. This means dwells are now slightly better than a 153, which should help avoid some of the delays. This issue cost a surprisingly large amount of time, as what was happening was that the sounders would start, the person would try the button, it wouldn't work, so they'd just stand there like a lemon, give up and walk to the guard's door. I reckon it was easily costing 10+ seconds per stop.

And a question - what is the reason for the bizarre button arrangement on the gangway? It's easier just to use the handle. Is it to comply with the letter (but not spirit) of PRM TSI perhaps?
 
Last edited:

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,257
I had a trip from Stewartby to Woburn Sands and back yesterday (Monday 22nd). 230003 and 005 were in service. I thought it was quite a decent train to ride on (OK I'm used to Northern Pacers), with a pleasant interior and reasonable acceleration. The toilet on 005 was oou. The guard said the batteries tended to overheat in hot weather, of which we have some now. One round trip was cancelled at midday but this was because the rostered driver was stuck at Euston with OHL problems. So I had an extended stay at Woburn Sands but still couldn't find the beach!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
So I had an extended stay at Woburn Sands but still couldn't find the beach!

About a mile and a half uphill you'll find the woods - it's sandy enough underfoot that it might as well be a beach! With lots of conifers it has a distinctly French feel about it.

Two sets seem to be out at the minute, but one of them is about 15 minutes late.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,310
Location
Fenny Stratford
The 230's are disgustingly hot inside at present. Awful. This needs sorting out.

They are also really struggling on the heat with overheating engines/gensets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top