• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ECML South disruption - OLE down 09/12

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Kilopylae

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2019
Messages
746
Location
Oxford and Devon
1N29 (1800 London Kings Cross to Edinburgh), which my friend is on, is stuck at a red signal south of Peterborough behind 1D28 (1833 London Kings Cross to Bradford Forster Square)

Edit: Looks like there's a whole queue of trains waiting at red signals stretching back from Grantham. It is slowly moving, e.g. 3J39 just went from being stuck at a red signal to making it to Peterborough.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,708
I am on 1D23 been told to expect single line working. Reckon the London Leeds section will take as long as Cologne to London did earlier today.
 

Trainguy34

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
690
Location
Kent
Looks like somethings been turned round at Peterborough, now seeing an "LNER 5CAR" on Traksy aswell as 1S28 - unsure what that's doing but it's 100 mins down however is ages away - not even anywhere near Grantham!
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,662
Looks like somethings been turned round at Peterborough, now seeing an "LNER 5CAR" on Traksy aswell as 1S28 - unsure what that's doing but it's 100 mins down however is ages away - not even anywhere near Grantham!
LNER 5 car is a set that was dumped there on Saturday night during disruption .
1S28 is delayed due to OHL issues near Sandy, delayed its journey into London!
 

Banham7

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2020
Messages
115
Location
Lincolnshire
LNER 5 car is a set that was dumped there on Saturday night during disruption .
800205 sat at Peterborough 5 (terminated short from 1B90 on 09/12)

800208 sat at Grantham Goods Line (formed as 1Z99 from Lincoln Terrace on 09/12 as a result of 1B91 being cancelled)
 

Trainguy34

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
690
Location
Kent
Wonder if it's going to be a special stop order at Doncaster since 1N94 is scheduled to be 1st stop York?
 

Mainliner

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2010
Messages
258
Location
North Tyneside
Heavily laden 1N94 now pulled out of Newark

… and the passengers from 1D81 have got off at Doncaster.
 
Last edited:

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,662
800205 sat at Peterborough 5 (terminated short from 1B90 on 09/12)

800208 sat at Grantham Goods Line (formed as 1Z99 from Lincoln Terrace on 09/12 as a result of 1B91 being cancelled)
800205 finically moved north tonight as 5F05 21:00 Peterborough to Doncaster depot.
 

Trainguy34

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
690
Location
Kent
2 things:
Where did 1D81 go, now a Lincoln LNER in P3 at Newark.
Why does it look like another Bradford-bound 180 has broke down near Newark?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,662
2 things:
Where did 1D81 go, now a Lincoln LNER in P3 at Newark.
Why does it look like another Bradford-bound 180 has broke down near Newark?
1D81 unit shunted into the sidings at Newark Station.
 

mm333

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2008
Messages
572
Location
53.8331°N 1.7734°W
The 1958 Lumo Edinburgh-Kings Cross is calling at Doncaster. Customers for the cancelled 2045 Leeds-Kings Cross - the last southbound LNER from Leeds - are being advised to board the 2121 Northern stopper to Donny and get the Lumo service.
 

EdChap

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2018
Messages
33
Surely there must be a case now to add extra OHLE supports betwwen existing supports and this should cause less problems.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,203
Location
Surrey
Surely there must be a case now to add extra OHLE supports betwwen existing supports and this should cause less problems.
If it was high winds that caused the dewirement then might help but if it was component failure in the headspan then what we need is a campaign to change out fatigued components.
 

ChristopherJ

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2005
Messages
423
Location
London, UK
LNER should go back to diesel operation between Peterborough and Doncaster permanently to stop these frequent dewirements on that ECML section.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,518
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Things *seem* to be getting back to normal this morning. A few late departures owing to disrupted staff, but nothing out of the ordinary.
LNER should go back to diesel operation between Peterborough and Doncaster permanently to stop these frequent dewirements on that ECML section.
And I suppose Thameslink should as well, on the arguably more heavily trafficked section south of Peterborough?

Most of Peterborough - Doncaster (well, Grantham - Doncaster) is two-track with single-track cantilevers which don't bring the same level of chaos that headspans do when the wires go down (although there are some headspans here & there).
It would be a lot easier in terms of possessions to re-engineer the OLE north of P'boro as you have longer windows of time in which to do the work on Saturday nights; those full 10-hour possessions are a luxury the routes nearer London don't have.
 

Mainliner

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2010
Messages
258
Location
North Tyneside
LNER should go back to diesel operation between Peterborough and Doncaster permanently to stop these frequent dewirements on that ECML section.
But that wouldn’t have helped last night, when the blockage between Grantham and Newark was caused by a fault on a non-LNER diesel unit…!

As a matter of interest, was the considerable delay due to the time taken to assess the dragging brake issue and give permission for 1D81 to proceed to Newark at reduced speed?

I would add that passengers on the immediately affected 1D81 and 1N94 trains were very patient and good-humoured, despite earlier delays getting to Peterborough, and no doubt this was partly because there was still heat, light, functioning toilets and (at least on 1N94) bottled water being made available.
 
Last edited:

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
739
But that wouldn’t have helped last night, when the blockage between Grantham and Newark was caused by a fault on a non-LNER diesel unit…!

As a matter of interest, was the considerable delay due to the time taken to assess the dragging brake issue and give permission for 1D81 to proceed to Newark at reduced speed?

I would add that passengers on the immediately affected 1D81 and 1N94 trains were very patient and good-humoured, despite earlier delays getting to Peterborough, and no doubt this was partly because there was still heat, light, functioning toilets and (at least on 1N94) bottled water being made available.
I assume 1D81 was the GC 180 that eventually arrived at Sunderland a shade under 3 hours late? Did it carry on in passenger service throughout?
 

Mainliner

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2010
Messages
258
Location
North Tyneside
I assume 1D81 was the GC 180 that eventually arrived at Sunderland a shade under 3 hours late? Did it carry on in passenger service throughout?
1N94 carried on towards Sunderland after picking up 1D81’s passengers at Newark and dropping them off at Doncaster, although I got off at York.

As mentioned earlier, 1D81 was shunted into a siding at Newark.
 
Last edited:

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,403
LNER should go back to diesel operation between Peterborough and Doncaster permanently to stop these frequent dewirements on that ECML section.
How are you doing that with a large proportion of the fleet being electric only?
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
739
1N94 carried on towards Sunderland after picking up 1D81’s passengers at Newark and dropping them off at Doncaster, although I got off at York.

As mentioned earlier, 1D81 was shunted into a siding at Newark.
Thank you
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top