thedbdiboy
Member
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 960
It looks to me like various parties are acting in a manner that is deliberately designed to make the system look crazy in order to justify their actions.
It is the actions (or inactions) of the DfT and certain train companies that have caused most of this craziness and it would actually be easy to fix the fares concerned by reducing them were appropriate. No-one is stopping TOCs doing that.
But they choose not to because they appear to be are lobbying for a system that favours them and the DfT wants that.
It's an interesting situation because they can choose to do some really crazy stuff in order to justify a new system.
In other words, some people are currently deemed to be paying too little and/or getting too much flexibility.
You are right that the plans do centre around restricting the routes people can take. There have been numerous attempts (some successful and some not) to reduce the routeing options for many journeys in recent years.
The whole situation has been caused by years of inaction but it is too simplistic to say that TOCs could have just reduced fares - the entire industry model promoted by government(s) has been predicated on maintaining and increasing fares income. You keep referring to TOCs as if they have won and that the DfT is caving into them but many of the owning groups have now been exiled from the industry and those that remain are tightly bound to what the DfT, the Treasury and No.10 want.
I wonder who will be the judge of the success (or not) of the trial? Some independent, impartial body with no vested interests or more than likely the Rail Delivery Group (whoever comes up with these daft names?) who as we all know havepassengersthe industry's best interests at heart...
It will be judged by the government, who are answerable to the voters (in a few years time...)