• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Electrification & Rolling Stock Cascade Impact Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,699
Quite the opposite, im assuming change but we have no idea what that change will be so we cant quantify the stock released. i.e. we cant extrapolate from todays service patterns.

Was not aimed at you :P Sorry if it seemed like it was.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

thealexweb

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
963
We dont really know what it frees up though, as apart from some Wigan-Victoria shuttles theres no current routes that could just be converted as they either start in Southport/Kirkby or go via Atherton. The press release mentions airport services being converted but there is currently no service that starts at Wigan and goes to the Airport as it originates in Southport (and TPE Airports are already electric via Chat Moss).


As you mention, there are 2tph from Wigan Wallgate to Manchester Victoria via Bolton at the moment. These could easily change to Wigan North Western. So that frees up four DMUs at least maybe?
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
I think its just a case of they decided to infill as a diversionary route for the Bolton line/TPE and as it was only a short stretch without really putting much thought into service patterns :P

Would be ideal if they had spare electrics for things like the extra Christmas shuttles each year though, and for sporting specials.
 
Last edited:

thealexweb

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
963
I think its just a case of they decided to infill as a diversionary route for the Bolton line/TPE and as it was only a short stretch without really putting much thought into service patterns :P

Would be ideal if they had spare electrics for things like the extra Christmas shuttles each year though, and for sporting specials.

They should ensure electrification is put in place between Manchester and the North East via Rochdale to provide future EMU transpennine services an alternative route.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Tony Miles (Modern Railways) has stated on a post on WNXX that the 317 aren't going to Northern as they were offered at a higher price than expected.

Meanwhile the deal that could see the 319 beading north means Northern wont do any work on the units with the next franchisee expected to that, ie start work in mid 2016.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
Tony Miles (Modern Railways) has stated on a post on WNXX that the 317 aren't going to Northern as they were offered at a higher price than expected.

Meanwhile the deal that could see the 319 beading north means Northern wont do any work on the units with the next franchisee expected to that, ie start work in mid 2016.

A Northern stakeholder manager has said Northern are in discussions about taking on 5 x 319s to use on Liverpool to Manchester Airport services from December in their current condition. He also said as more 319s come Northern may be expected to release some DMUs for other operators, depending on what business case other operators put forward.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
A Northern stakeholder manager has said Northern are in discussions about taking on 5 x 319s to use on Liverpool to Manchester Airport services from December in their current condition. He also said as more 319s come Northern may be expected to release some DMUs for other operators, depending on what business case other operators put forward.

So 3 released from the 377/2 and another 2 from the 387's arriving later this year then.

Wait a minute, isn't the Man Airport - Liverpool run with 1st class?

No work done to 319s. As people feared then. Shame.

Very.
 
Last edited:

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,699
So 3 released from the 377/2 and another 2 from the 387's arriving later this year then.

Wait a minute, isn't the Man Airport - Liverpool run with 1st class?



Very.

No its not its run by Northern Rail who have no first class on any trains (Bar 322s declassified big seats)

Yes but the new franchise will have to. We really need the Northern Rail franchise to be renewed and the investment finally occur.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Ah thanks guys. I seem to recall a comment on one forum about using 319/3 to the Airport and the lack of first class.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,699
Ah thanks guys. I seem to recall a comment on one forum about using 319/3 to the Airport and the lack of first class.

Airport has First Class provision to Blackpool, Preston, Lancaster, Barrow and Scotland. Then on South TPE to Sheffield & Cleethorpes. Then on the North to Newcastle, Middlesborough, Leeds. (and all other intermediate stations) So 319s to Blackpool is probably the discussion you remember.
 

Wavertreelad

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
709
No work done to 319s. As people feared then. Shame.

I suspect most passengers will not notice much difference, what is perhaps more important is that Northern retains any DMU's displaced by EMU's to strengthen existing services to allow more passengers to travel. More bums on seats (or standing) will increase fare revenue to perhaps eventually help fund refurbishment eventually, but don't hold your breath.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
No work done to 319s. As people feared then. Shame.
It is. But to be expected when refurbishment is an extra expense that Northern have could not have budgeted for in the original franchise award - but should have been taken into consideration by DfT when negotiating the (non-contractual) extension.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,853
I don't think it's too big a problem for the first couple of 319s to enter service without a refurbishment provided there is a good quality refurbishment programme once Northern starts to receive more 319s in the future. In some ways it would make sense to carry out the refurbishment in one big project.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,699
It is. But to be expected when refurbishment is an extra expense that Northern have could not have budgeted for in the original franchise award - but should have been taken into consideration by DfT when negotiating the (non-contractual) extension.

Oh yes fully agree that it is the DfT who messed up and they should pay not Northern.
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
4,906
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
It is. But to be expected when refurbishment is an extra expense that Northern have could not have budgeted for in the original franchise award - but should have been taken into consideration by DfT when negotiating the (non-contractual) extension.

What if it was and Northern just wanted far too much of a margin for it? DfT would have been funding it either way so they have a responsibility to pax payers not to be taken too far. Wonderful "privatised" railway...
 

thealexweb

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
963
No its not its run by Northern Rail who have no first class on any trains (Bar 322s declassified big seats)

Yes but the new franchise will have to. We really need the Northern Rail franchise to be renewed and the investment finally occur.

The Northern franchise needs extending doesn't it. I read in a magazine if nothing is done to extend it it will lapse next month.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
A Northern stakeholder manager has said Northern are in discussions about taking on 5 x 319s to use on Liverpool to Manchester Airport services from December in their current condition. He also said as more 319s come Northern may be expected to release some DMUs for other operators, depending on what business case other operators put forward.

Given that right now Northern cannot afford to lose a single unit ceding DMUs is unthinkable for years if ever.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
Ah thanks guys. I seem to recall a comment on one forum about using 319/3 to the Airport and the lack of first class.

I imagine it was probably more of the case of someone saying First Class could be justified on Airport-Liverpool services with that service getting some business travellers.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Given that right now Northern cannot afford to lose a single unit ceding DMUs is unthinkable for years if ever.

Agreed. However, I think the short term problem is that Northern, TPE and FGW are finally getting overdue additional stock and other operators like EMT aren't getting any extra stock but if they put a good business case forward for additional stock then either Northern or FGW will likely have to release stock.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
This could explain why Porterbrook have looked at re-engineering 319s to have faster acceleration.

Craig Harrop said:
In developing the business case for the Northern Triangle electrification programme, the DfT identified that the Class 319 sets which were to be released by the Thameslink programme could possibly provide a value-for-money source of rolling stock. It was noted at this point that in their current state these units could not meet the sectional running times that can be achieved by the 323s so either a new timetable or significant re-engineering, with a traction upgrade, would be required to enable them to match the Class 323 acceleration curve if they were to be considered for use in South Manchester.

Also worth noting is the 323s have TfGM funded CCTV and a condition of the TfGM funding is that either the 323s will stay in GM or if they don't the units that replace them will have CCTV fitted from the outset at no cost to TfGM.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,736
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Oh yes fully agree that it is the DfT who messed up and they should pay not Northern.

Don't forget there's a third party here (Porterbrook).
There's a lot of bad blood with DfT over past leasing charges for the ex-BR fleet and I imagine negotiations will be a bit fraught.

Northern turning down the spare 317s on the grounds of cost was not a good sign (although the Rosco there was Angel Trains).
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Why do you think Northern turned them down? its the Dft that has control of their fleet through its vetoing acceptance of revenue risk from extra units. In the past the Dft has consistently proven they value their revenue share from Northern over the comfort of passengers.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
Why do you think Northern turned them down? its the Dft that has control of their fleet through its vetoing acceptance of revenue risk from extra units. In the past the Dft has consistently proven they value their revenue share from Northern over the comfort of passengers.

Maybe it's a case of DfT had no plans for Northern to take on any 317s so Northern had to look at the business case themselves while with the 319s DfT want Northern to have them ahead of new or newer trains.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,736
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Why do you think Northern turned them down? its the Dft that has control of their fleet through its vetoing acceptance of revenue risk from extra units. In the past the Dft has consistently proven they value their revenue share from Northern over the comfort of passengers.

Yes but none of that revenue share stuff applies after March because the franchise contract will have expired.
The "direct award" will be a new short-term deal, as for FGW and Virgin.
I can understand Northern not wanting a tiny fleet of 317s with no prospect of more.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
Tony Miles has said on wnxx that it seems that the DFT have pretty much decided the 319s are the train for Northern and not TPE
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Why do you think Northern turned them down? its the Dft that has control of their fleet through its vetoing acceptance of revenue risk from extra units. In the past the Dft has consistently proven they value their revenue share from Northern over the comfort of passengers.

The information over the 317 offers to Northern stated both Northern and DfT were surprised at the costing and both rejected it not one or the other.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
The information over the 317 offers to Northern stated both Northern and DfT were surprised at the costing and both rejected it not one or the other.

He didnt explicitly say they were rejected in the initial post.

These may well the the "best value offer" that Northern has received... I hear hints that the 317s were offered at rather more than Northern or DfT expected to pay.

followed up by

DfT has decided that 319s are the solution for the Northern franchise
 
Last edited:

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
He didnt explicitly say they were rejected in the initial post.

followed up by

No but he states they are going for 319s over the offer of 317s, if that's not rejecting an offer I don't know what is.

The 317's were never going to be answer to all Northern's requirements so a single fleet of EMUs make more sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top