• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR Class 170 updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Chris172

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2018
Messages
121



Be nice to see the 172s back on snow hill lines and the longer train lengths which will come with it.

Obviously the 196s as seen so far will be an improvement on both stock which are currently still running on the Hereford line.
172s are due to be all 5 cars and some 4 car from May on Snow Hill, No more 6 car services.
 

170UTD

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2022
Messages
257
Location
Lincolnshire
Has 170512 entered service with EMR yet? 502 arrived after it and it's in service, so something must be up with it.
 

tomm

On Moderation
Joined
25 Feb 2013
Messages
179
Location
Ludlow Shropshire
Depending on where it was it might of been 170 203 or 204. One was showing to be cancelled at Cross Keys i think it 2F38 as then ran 5F38 from Cross Keys to Cardiff Canton. If that is the unit in question I AM NOT saying it is but if it was that service the 5F38 shows it obviously damaged enough to warrant being taken out.. you find with trees and trains its the windows that go first with a massive crack or a shattered but not broken. Just confirming which one my best guess it was 204 yesterday which hit a tree by Crosskeys as went fully out of service after 11am.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,085
Location
wales
Depending on where it was it might of been 170 203 or 204. One was showing to be cancelled at Cross Keys i think it 2F38 as then ran 5F38 from Cross Keys to Cardiff Canton. If that is the unit in question I AM NOT saying it is but if it was that service the 5F38 shows it obviously damaged enough to warrant being taken out.. you find with trees and trains its the windows that go first with a massive crack or a shattered but not broken. Just confirming which one my best guess it was 204 yesterday which hit a tree by Crosskeys as went fully out of service after 11am.
Sorry I'm a little confused the relation of this to emr and what your information is based on the Crosskeys line has been shut for a week due to lack of 175s and stock moving to compensate
 

tomm

On Moderation
Joined
25 Feb 2013
Messages
179
Location
Ludlow Shropshire
170 203 or 204 one was showing to be cancelled at Cross Keys i think it 2F38 as then ran 5F38 from Cross Keys to Cardiff Canton. 5F38 shows it obviously damaged enough to warrant being taken out Monday 13th March.

 
Last edited:

170UTD

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2022
Messages
257
Location
Lincolnshire
Yes apparently 175s are going on Maesteg and Cheltenham and 150s on Ebbw Vale from May when the 170s are meant to be going. But Todays Railways magazine said they are in talks about keeping some 170s a bit longer. So it sounds to me like they are expecting the 175s to be out of service for some time?
Quoted from another thread, but it looks like there's going to be more delays in getting the TfW 170s to EMR given the problems with the 175s.
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,327
Location
Neath
Quoted from another thread, but it looks like there's going to be more delays in getting the TfW 170s to EMR given the problems with the 175s.
Yes read this in Todays Railways magazine. There was an article about both TFW class 197s and 231s. They did say they are in talks at the moment so nothing is set in stone. But if the 175s aren't likely to be back in service anytime soon it would make sense they keep the 170s longer if they possibly can.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,643
The plans have always been very liquid but certainly a month or two ago the intent was for TfW to release some of the 3 cars for May and hold on to the rest for a while longer.

The 175 fleet collapsing will not help matters but equally the EMR summer plan relies on having more 3 car trains available than is currently the case - 8 units isn't enough to deliver the planned timetable.
 

170UTD

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2022
Messages
257
Location
Lincolnshire
The plans have always been very liquid but certainly a month or two ago the intent was for TfW to release some of the 3 cars for May and hold on to the rest for a while longer.

The 175 fleet collapsing will not help matters but equally the EMR summer plan relies on having more 3 car trains available than is currently the case - 8 units isn't enough to deliver the planned timetable.
Do you know how many at a minimum EMR need to run the summer timetable. If they only need another three 3-car units for instance. I can see a scenario where TfW release 3 but keep 5 for a while.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,085
Location
wales
The plans have always been very liquid but certainly a month or two ago the intent was for TfW to release some of the 3 cars for May and hold on to the rest for a while longer.

The 175 fleet collapsing will not help matters but equally the EMR summer plan relies on having more 3 car trains available than is currently the case - 8 units isn't enough to deliver the planned timetable.
Also worth noting tfw have limited service on valleys lines, no service milford Haven/ Fishguard-Carmarthen (bus replacement.
No service cross keys to Newport (bus replacement), no service Chester-Liverpool ( bus replacement), no service wrexham-bidston (bus replacement) and no service to Ffestiniog (bus replacement). All to release units to cover the 175s which were supposed to cover for 170s to leave
 

tomm

On Moderation
Joined
25 Feb 2013
Messages
179
Location
Ludlow Shropshire
Luckily 170204 was back In service the day after it hit tree working the 12:38 Ebbw Vale Town to Cardiff Central near Crosskeys 13th March so they are not short of the 8 170s with TFW.

Speaking of 170204 any further confirmation if it was definitely thus one which hit tree near crosskeys or was it 203.
 
Last edited:

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,643
Seems to be double 170s on Nottingham to Liverpool today! Showing 170271+170502.
There were a couple of pairs and a 3 car last Sunday.

They tend to venture up there most often on a Sunday.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
1,995
Seems to be double 170s on Nottingham to Liverpool today! Showing 170271+170502.

There were a couple of pairs and a 3 car last Sunday.

They tend to venture up there most often on a Sunday.

...along with a couple of single 2 car sets to Norwich last Sunday.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,541
Location
Farnham
Not 502 - it was sat at Nottingham station yesterday at the back of a rather interesting 8-car 170-170-170-158 formation.
What a catch! Would love to see if you have any more pictures of that. Assuming it wasn’t in service?
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,643
What a catch! Would love to see if you have any more pictures of that. Assuming it wasn’t in service?
It happens every day, you get long lash ups taking units up to the station from the shed with combinations of 156, 158 and 170. They're then split at the station to form their services.
 

QSK19

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2020
Messages
665
Location
Leicestershire
What a catch! Would love to see if you have any more pictures of that. Assuming it wasn’t in service?
It was on Platform 1 and wasn’t on the departure board; so I would guess it wasn’t in service. I would defer to LowLevel’s answer on this.

I think the 170 units were 502, 271 and 504 (no idea what the 158 unit number was); but what I can definitely confirm is that the class-subclass order was as follows:

- 158 (EMT colours)
- 170/5 (EMR colours)
- 170/2 (TfW colours)
- 170/5 (EMR colours)

Seems to be double 170s on Nottingham to Liverpool today! Showing 170271+170502.
Explains why 271 and 502 were the two units at the back of the 8-car 158/170 formation.

What a catch! Would love to see if you have any more pictures of that. Assuming it wasn’t in service?
Got this picture which is clearer in terms of the order of trains. You’ll have to excuse my rushed use of the panoramic photo setting - was half having to keep an eye on a 6 and a 4 year old!
 

Attachments

  • 872364AB-B19A-4558-8354-919D2B4046A9.jpeg
    872364AB-B19A-4558-8354-919D2B4046A9.jpeg
    881.2 KB · Views: 121

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,541
Location
Farnham
It was on Platform 1 and wasn’t on the departure board; so I would guess it wasn’t in service. I would defer to LowLevel’s answer on this.

I think the 170 units were 502, 271 and 504 (no idea what the 158 unit number was); but what I can definitely confirm is that the class-subclass order was as follows:

- 158 (EMT colours)
- 170/5 (EMR colours)
- 170/2 (TfW colours)
- 170/5 (EMR colours)


Explains why 271 and 502 were the two units at the back of the 8-car 158/170 formation.


Got this picture which is clearer in terms of the order of trains. You’ll have to excuse my rushed use of the panoramic photo setting - was half having to keep an eye on a 6 and a 4 year old!
Very nice.
502 and 271 did eventually split as only 271 went onto Norwich beyond Nottingham.
 

Top