Muttley
Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 247
You reckon PD grosses more than £350m a week ?And the analogy falls at the first step...
I don't.
The analogy stands.
You reckon PD grosses more than £350m a week ?And the analogy falls at the first step...
No it doesn't, because the UK doesn't give the EU all of its income.You reckon PD grosses more than £350m a week ?
I don't.
The analogy stands.
The National Crime Agency is investigating Arron Banks and his Leave.EU campaign for alleged offences committed at the 2016 EU referendum.
Mr Banks and another senior campaign figure, Liz Bilney, were referred to the agency by the Electoral Commission.
The watchdog said it suspected money given to the campaign came "from impermissible sources".
Mr Banks has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection to the referendum campaign.
The Electoral Commission investigation focused on £2m reported to have been loaned to Better for the Country, which ran Leave.EU, by Mr Banks and his group of insurance companies and a further £6m reported to have been given to the organisation, on behalf of Leave.EU, by Arron Banks alone.
Of this, £2.9m was used to fund referendum spending on behalf of Leave.EU and donations to other campaign groups during the EU referendum, the Electoral Commission said.
The Electoral Commission says it has "reasonable grounds to suspect" that Mr Banks was not the true source of the £8m loans made to Better for the Country.
Leave.EU was a separate campaign to the official Vote Leave organisation.
Probably not, but the latest on Sky news is that there are plans afoot to airlift stranded passengers in the EU back to Britain in the event of no-deal and flights being grounded - I kid you not (which begs the question why won't the allocated airlift planes be grounded too....??? **answer - they will be EU registered I suppose) so I wonder if Jezza and Kezza with three screaming preteens stranded at Palma Airport for hours upon hours would still put Freedom of Movement top of their referendum priorities? Or perhaps an easy journey home might change their vote??Finally, the cupboards are being opened and the skeletons are coming out. Quite appropriate after Halloween! Enough to put the referendum outcome in doubt?
Not a problem, I'm not an inflexible monster.No it doesn't, because the UK doesn't give the EU all of its income.
Not a problem, I'm not an inflexible monster.
You pick a percentage, and I'll let you have the same deal as PD. What would you like to send me, 10%, 20%, 35% ?
The contribution made to the EU equates to about 1.2% of Government spending (not income).Not a problem, I'm not an inflexible monster.
You pick a percentage, and I'll let you have the same deal as PD. What would you like to send me, 10%, 20%, 35% ?
£350 million a week works out as 1.2% of our national GDP. So, for your analogy to work, PD would have to send you 1.2% of his wages. Not 100%. And you would have to give ~50% of that 1.2% back to PD.You reckon PD grosses more than £350m a week ?
I don't.
The analogy stands.
The analogy stands.£350 million a week works out as 1.2% of our national GDP. So, for your analogy to work, PD would have to send you 1.2% of his wages. Not 100%. And you would have to give ~50% of that 1.2% back to PD.
So, your analogy does fall.
I don't have a job. So, you owe me 1.2% of my £27,750 student debt. Or, £333 to be paid directly to Student Finance England please!The analogy stands.
That's four of you interested in sending me 1.2% of your wages.
Many thanks.
Why, in your analogy, would I not be allowed to PM other members?The analogy stands.
That'll be 77p, 1.2% of my weekly carer's allowance. I'd send it but the cost of postage would be prohibitive.The analogy stands.
That's four of you interested in sending me 1.2% of your wages.
Many thanks.
Good ignoring.Don't. Feed. The. Troll.
Sorry, it doesn't work like that.I don't have a job. So, you owe me 1.2% of my £27,750 student debt. Or, £333 to be paid directly to Student Finance England please!
And, in return, I require over 50% of that 1.2% back from you for various home improvements (see EU contributions towards roads in the Highlands etc.) and unlimited free access to all other members' markets, as well as those outside parties who have signed up to deals.Sorry, it doesn't work like that.
You'll notice that the UKs deficit may be coming down, but the debt is still increasing. And even though we're in debt we still give (your figures) 1.2% away to the EU.
To continue my analogy, your student debt is no concern of mine, but I still require 1.2% of your income, be it Jobsekers Allowance, Universal Credit, or just goodwill from friends/family.
I would.One question for you, if we weren't in the current EU, would you vote to join ?
Well, PD hasn't had their questions answered.Good ignoring.
Well done.
You've had your questions answered, and just because you don't agree you have a sulk.
Me too, including Schengen - might even accept the Euro when we get back to good exchange rates. If we go back we may have to, so I would suggest anyone who is anti-Euro should wish we remained in on the same terms and kept Sterling!I would.
Without a knowledge of just what situation the UK would be in now if it had never been in the EU, you are demonstrating the sort of blind faith that you accuse Brexiters of having.I would.
But I can see what benefits membership of the EU has brought to other countries, like Ireland for example. I have evidence.Without a knowledge of just what situation the UK would be in now if it had never been in the EU, you are demonstrating the sort of blind faith that you accuse Brexiters of having.
But I can see what benefits membership of the EU has brought to other countries, like Ireland for example. I have evidence.
It's quite interesting though. Part of my degree is studying the EU (how it works, what it does etc.) and seeing the perceptions of the EU as opposed to the reality is interesting.Don't. Feed. The. Troll.
If the UK joined as net recipients things could have been different. But we didn't and I don't think that would be an option in your scenario either.But I can see what benefits membership of the EU has brought to other countries, like Ireland for example. I have evidence.
Then why did De Gaulle veto our entry for so long?The EU wants the UK for its wealth and world strength. Nothing altruistic in it.
De Gaulle was a bitter and twisted man who grudgingly accepted that the USA liberated his country but would never accept the UK (or Canada) role in France's liberation. "Vive Quebec libre!" What a disgraceful intervention in politics in a country where you are a guest.Then why did De Gaulle veto our entry for so long?