Vote for parties who have policies to reduce it. Vote for different parties if they don't keep their word when in power
Yes, quite a lot of people have done. However, there is clearly frustration that this is getting nowhere. (and there are always going to be hangers on intent of creating opportunistic mischief)
Distance yourself from the racists and don't use terms and phrases that we know are dog whistles to them, actually actively show that you do not welcome them. Totally and utterly reject the various conspiracy theories going around (two tier policing, "great replacement" etc etc).
Not sure how this is going to help at all in reducing immigration?
Suggest realistic solutions to the issues that reducing migration would cause. Suggest realitic policy options rather than just "less of them" (e.g. skills based etc).
Realistic to whom? To the people advocating the quantity of immigration that is currently happening, and more? or an alternative reality?
Then maybe we could have an adult conversation about it. I'd still likely disagree with you but at least then we'd be discussing policy options and decisions rather than the absolute mess that conversation is right now.
When the immigration advocates start considering holding an adult conversation (rather than just shouting others down, and calling everyone racists), perhaps the country will get somewhere with it? Being too open contributed towards the Brexit vote.
The rioters are indeed primarily responsible, and it should certainly be the rioters and those who incited them to riot online who should receive the full force of the law. However in the past 10-15 years we have had an environment in which it has been increasingly seen as "OK" to have strident anti-immigration views.
And why shouldn't it be 'OK' to have such views? They are nothing new, going back to the time of Rt. Hon. Enoch Powell.
To be quite honest I don't think the people participating in these riots will be happy until we completely block immigration from third-world and Muslim countries in particular.
Quite possibly you are right. But then is white immigration to third-world and Muslim countries welcomed with open arms, apart from in some strictly controlled way with no hope of citizenship rights?
I'm not going to speak for
@nw1 but in an earlier post I said:
I meant it then and I stand by it now. By all means, agitate for change but do so using non-violent means.
I agree with you (and I make myself clear on this), but I am unsure how any change is going to be achieved by non-violent methods? There are plenty of examples where the other methods have achieved their aims in some way or another.
2001 happened after a National Front march got banned. What, should that have gone ahead? Should the government then have listened to them? They're racist.
Yes, many people are - to some degree or another, despite (or possibly in some cases, because of) years of official indoctrination of multi-culturalism.