• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Football

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
7,947
Location
West Riding
After our 2-1 defeat to QPR at home today I can see Ipswich even possibly winning the Championship League as they now only 3 points below us.
It’s still far too early to be making any calls with how long is left to go and how close it is in my opinion. Personally, from what I’ve seen Leicester are a far better team than Ipswich.
 

DannyMich2018

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
737
It’s still far too early to be making any calls with how long is left to go and how close it is in my opinion. Personally, from what I’ve seen Leicester are a far better team than Ipswich.
Yes of course I want us to win the league and we are good but unfortunately they are catching us up now so we need to get a gap ahead now. Not easy for us as we have 4 away games now, 1 been the FA Cup Quarter Finals.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,679
Location
Another planet...
Yes of course I want us to win the league and we are good but unfortunately they are catching us up now so we need to get a gap ahead now. Not easy for us as we have 4 away games now, 1 been the FA Cup Quarter Finals.
Often harder for the leader than the chasing pack... I'm just disappointed that you've decided to go off the boil when facing our relegation rivals!
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,879
Yes of course I want us to win the league and we are good but unfortunately they are catching us up now so we need to get a gap ahead now. Not easy for us as we have 4 away games now, 1 been the FA Cup Quarter Finals.

Sunderland on Tuesday though to ease yourselves back into form
 

JD2168

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2022
Messages
932
Location
Sheffield
In the Sunday games Bournemouth beat Burnley 2-0 at Turf Moor in a largely poor match. Manchester City beat Manchester United 3-1 at the Etihad which featured a brilliant goal by Marcus Rashford & a very good finish from Phil Foden. Eirling Haaland missed from barely 2 yards out in the first half but did score towards the end.

Celtic failed to take advantage of Rangers losing to Motherwell on Saturday by losing 2-0 at Hearts.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,211
In the Sunday games Bournemouth beat Burnley 2-0 at Turf Moor in a largely poor match. Manchester City beat Manchester United 3-1 at the Etihad which featured a brilliant goal by Marcus Rashford & a very good finish from Phil Foden. Eirling Haaland missed from barely 2 yards out in the first half but did score towards the end.

Celtic failed to take advantage of Rangers losing to Motherwell on Saturday by losing 2-0 at Hearts.

when was the last time Rangers and Celtic both lost on the same weekend?
 

1D54

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2019
Messages
522
And for the first time in six years, both halves of the Old Firm have suffered league defeats on the same weekend.
 

THC

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2009
Messages
471
Location
Stuck on the GEML
Brendan Rodgers bemoaning VAR for costing Celtic the match, seemingly forgetting the saved penalty which would have put them 1-0 up and changed the whole game!
He wasn't wrong though. The way VAR is employed is ruining the game, in Scotland at least. We had a goal disallowed shortly after that penalty that was ruled out for a marginal offside some twenty seconds or so before the ball hit the net. Hearts too had a similar goal chalked off just before half time. Yang's booking for a high foot was upgraded to a red card following the interjection of the VAR official. Each stoppage led to a break in play of several minutes and in each case the VAR official overrode the actual referee's original decision. I'm not disputing the result, although playing for 75 minutes with ten men hardly helped our chances, but how is VAR benefitting the game? I just don't see it tbh.

THC
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
3,660
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
Some of the decisions in the Hearts/Celtic game were certainly debatable, but in such cases I always try to imagine what the aggrieved manager would say if the situation was reversed; IMHO that manager would have been clamouring for a penalty, or sending off, if their player was the sinned against party.
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,879
Each stoppage led to a break in play of several minutes and in each case the VAR official overrode the actual referee's original decision

Bear in mind that the VAR will check dozens of things in each game, and only a small proportion progress to asking the match ref to take a second look. These should be the decisions that the VAR feels are either objectively wrong (offside) or where they feel the match ref has made a mistake (often because the angle they had didn’t give a clear view).

I don’t see how anyone can argue the red card for Yang was wrong, but watching the video the ref’s view is impeded by both the back of the fouled Hearts player and another Hearts player in between, which probably explains why he didn’t send him off straight away
 

THC

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2009
Messages
471
Location
Stuck on the GEML
Bear in mind that the VAR will check dozens of things in each game, and only a small proportion progress to asking the match ref to take a second look. These should be the decisions that the VAR feels are either objectively wrong (offside) or where they feel the match ref has made a mistake (often because the angle they had didn’t give a clear view).
I stand by my original assertion. The way VAR is used not only disrupts the flow of the match but compromises yet further the authority of the match officials, shaky enough in football for many reasons. It should IMO be for the referee to call upon VAR when doubt remains over a decision, as in rugby, rather than for the VAR officials to override those taken by their colleagues on the pitch. It is ruining the game as a spectacle.

I don’t see how anyone can argue the red card for Yang was wrong, but watching the video the ref’s view is impeded by both the back of the fouled Hearts player and another Hearts player in between, which probably explains why he didn’t send him off straight away
Yet the assistant referee had a clear and unimpeded view and did not flag for a sending off. Yang's high foot was dangerous play, no doubt, but contact with the Hearts player did not appear intentional. The yellow card seemed correct in light of that. Which comes back to my point above, that the way VAR is used further compromises the authority of the match officials.

THC
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,879
It should IMO be for the referee to call upon VAR when doubt remains over a decision, as in rugby, rather than for the VAR officials to override those taken by their colleagues on the pitch

Have you watched a rugby match lately? There are a lot of interventions from the TMO where the ref hasn't even seen any hint of foul play.

Where the ref does ask the TMO for help is generally with try / no try decisions (where the football equivalent is goal line technology and an automatic VAR check of the build up) or where the TMO is asked to help agree the sanction for foul play the ref has seen.

If the equivalent of the Yang incident had happened in a rugby match the yellow card would have meant a sin bin and then the TMO reviewing whether it should stay yellow or be upgraded to red, so a similar after the event intervention to a VAR


Yang's high foot was dangerous play

So a red card offence

contact with the Hearts player did not appear intentional

Utterly irrelevant. There is no mention of intent in the laws regarding foul play

Yet the assistant referee had a clear and unimpeded view and did not flag for a sending off

The lino was a few yards further down the touchline and was side on, so he'll have had a clear view that there was a high foot but not necessarily a clear view of the point of contact
 

Lewisham2221

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2005
Messages
1,482
Location
Staffordshire
The problem with the current implementation of VAR is that it is just another layer of subjectivity, inconsistency and inefficiency. How often do we see examples of virtually identical incidents being handled differently from one week to the next, or even in different games on the same day? Towards the beginning of the season (was it this season??) we even had Howard Webb coming out and apologising for the very howlers that VAR was supposed to eliminate. An apology doesn't actually change the outcome of the game though...

Every (???) goal in the PL is checked by VAR for offside. What, then, is the point of the linesman? Then there's all the inconsistencies around whether an offside player is involved/interfering with play, where to differentiate between different phases of play (same with fouls in the build up to a goal).

Then there's the nonsense of when VAR can and can't intervene. If the red team are attacking and get fouled in the penalty area, the VAR can intervene if the ref misses it. However, if it happens just outside the box, VAR cannot intervene and the blue team get away with one. But if the red team are attacking and foul the blue team outside the box, and go on to score, VAR can go on and disallow the goal for that foul. Same with red cards. VAR can intervene for a straight red, but their hands are tied when it comes to what should be a blatant second yellow.

Then there's the vastly subjective inconsistency surrounding what actually classes as a foul, or handball, or involved/interfering with play, or red card offence. It's all just a mess.

As for the use of VAR in cup games...

Edit - Apologies for potentially derailing the whole thread :lol:
 

dangie

Established Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,236
Location
Rugeley Staffordshire
If VAR is ever scrapped we’ll still be left with the slow motion freeze frame multi-view television replays from every angle of every incident. Refereeing decisions will still be analysed over & over & over. Match of the Day pundits will spend more time debating what should or shouldn’t have happened rather than what did happen.

The only answer is to scrap VAR and scrap television replays. The referee’s decision is final. Yes of course there will be wrong decisions at times, but without the current micro analysis no one will ever know.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
1,422
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
Oh heck, Arsenal were 3-0 up at Sheffield Utd before 15 minutes had gone, gonna me a long night for the home fans

It's now 5-0 and it's not half time yet.
It's Arsenal's third consecutive away game when they've scored 5 or more. (Burnley 5, West Ham 6)
 
Last edited:

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,248
Location
No longer here
I stand by my original assertion. The way VAR is used not only disrupts the flow of the match but compromises yet further the authority of the match officials, shaky enough in football for many reasons. It should IMO be for the referee to call upon VAR when doubt remains over a decision, as in rugby, rather than for the VAR officials to override those taken by their colleagues on the pitch. It is ruining the game as a spectacle.
I hate VAR as much as anyone else, more so in fact, but Celtic weren’t hard done by at the weekend.

Yet the assistant referee had a clear and unimpeded view and did not flag for a sending off.
Assistants do not recommend sanctions, they can only indicate fouls. As the assistant did, by flagging.

Yang's high foot was dangerous play, no doubt, but contact with the Hearts player did not appear intentional. The yellow card seemed correct in light of that.
That’s a red card offence. Very high foot, made contact. No need for intent for it to be a red under the Laws.
 

1D54

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2019
Messages
522
Has to be a good chance on the Saints 0-9 Leicester Prem record getting beaten tonight unless Arsenal take their foot off the gas.
 

THC

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2009
Messages
471
Location
Stuck on the GEML
I hate VAR as much as anyone else, more so in fact, but Celtic weren’t hard done by at the weekend.
Really? VAR indicated a penalty for this supposed handball by Tomoki Iwata, from which Hearts scored. The player was facing away from the ball and mid-leap when it hit him, yet the penalty was awarded.

THC
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1709587159244.jpg
    FB_IMG_1709587159244.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 12

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,248
Location
No longer here
Really? VAR indicated a penalty, for this supposed handball by Tomoki Iwata, from which Hearts scored. The player was facing away from the ball and mid-leap when it hit him, yet the penalty was awarded. Hardly fair.

THC
That’s a penalty for as well under the Laws and the interpretation of “the arm making the body silhouette unnaturally bigger”these days. Eye closed isn’t a defence. No intent is necessary for a handball offence. I don’t like it either, and think it’s a load of bull, but that’s how it is.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
1,422
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
Arsenal won 6-0 with each goal scored by a different player (all be it one played for Sheffield).
Arsenal's goal difference is now at least 6 better than anyone else in the division, who knows that might be important at the end of the season.
Sheffield United were just a clueless collection of 11 players in the same coloured shirts, totally outclassed.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,439
Arsenal won 6-0 with each goal scored by a different player (all be it one played for Sheffield).
Arsenal's goal difference is now at least 6 better than anyone else in the division, who knows that might be important at the end of the season.
Sheffield United were just a clueless collection of 11 players in the same coloured shirts, totally outclassed.
It’s odd how often games like tonight’s seem to ease off a bit in the second half, I was thinking 0-10 was likely at one point.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,423
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
North West Counties Football League...Premier Division

Bury 2 ... Lower Breck 1

Bury took the lead in the 36th minute, but Lower Breck equalized a minute before half-time. Bury regained the lead in the 69th minute and recorded yet another win. What is worth noting is the attendance of 2,934.
Bury's position at the head of the league table was helped by second-placed Wythenshawe Town losing 0-1 away at AFC Liverpool, so Bury are now three points clear of Wythenshawe Town, with two games in hand.
 

dangie

Established Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,236
Location
Rugeley Staffordshire
…The only answer is to scrap VAR and scrap television replays.…
Following on from my post above, the problem is that many football fans have only known football with television replays. They didn’t know football before the television replay. Watching a match without television replays would be unthinkable. They will never know how good football was before the television replay. In a few years time the same will apply to VAR.
 

Top