Buttsy
Established Member
Well you should be at the platform in plenty of time...
I'm normally in very good time I can catch the one before...

Well you should be at the platform in plenty of time...
Well you should be at the platform in plenty of time...
This walking-through-first issue came up yesterday, in an unrelated thread! The recurring examples were the LM trains and the 185s - facilities accessible to standard class passengers are located either side of the first class sections. Ergo, it MUST be acceptable to walk through these portions of the carriage, even if you only hold a standard class ticket.
Clearly, the NRCoCs are covering all bases by saying otherwise, but this does nothing but create inconsistency and disparities between operators, confusing passengers further (especially if FGW are actually telling people off for it while TPE are advising people that its acceptable!).
As with so many other things about rail in the UK - utterly ridiculous.
I know the exact facts of this story as I was on this train but I will not be discussing any details. Suffice to say the story holds truth but has seen various twists to the actual events. Be careful what you read and believe.
I know the exact facts of this story as I was on this train but I will not be discussing any details. Suffice to say the story holds truth but has seen various twists to the actual events. Be careful what you read and believe.
No comments here can erase my amusement - I know that if the aide had purchased standard class she was wrong to do so and if it was George who just assumed that he was travelling first and just sat down, the aide was wrong. So it seems the aide got it wrong whatever - it wasn't anything to do with George. He just did what he does best.
I know the exact facts of this story as I was on this train but I will not be discussing any details. Suffice to say the story holds truth but has seen various twists to the actual events. Be careful what you read and believe.
front page of the morning sun.... Osbournes a First class plonker...
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...its-in-First-Class-with-Standard-tickets.html
Is that remotely relevant to anything?... and the most important question hasn't been answered yet - was he travelling on expenses or out of his own pocket?
We can only read what is available to read. Claiming to know the exact facts but then refusing to disclose them provides nothing useful for us to read.
Yes it is normally acceptable to walk through in such circumstances, the NCoC don't have to be enforced where they are restrictive to the passenger.
This is so trivial its irrelevant - if someone buys or upgrades to first and sits there fine.
To be honest it makes sense for senior politicians (i.e. cabinet and shadow cabinet) to travel first anyway so they can work or spread papers about as necessary. Its one of the main reasons I perfer first (that and its easier to get a good sleep!).
Errrr.... Ramesh Chhabra is a man.when Ramesh Chhabra approached the ticket inspector pleading to let him let George stay in first class as she purchased the wrong ticket for him. The ticket inspector asked for around £190 (obviously she mistyped on her Twitter account) which she reluctantly paid.
I've been on EC before now when they've made an announcement just before we arrive in London telling Standard Class passengers not to walk through First before leaving the train.
Virgin sell a full fare ticket on board to passengers requiring a new ticket, and the cheapest ticket on board to passengers travelling on the wrong train on an Advance ticket (it has been reported that other TOCs will also do this).If he had an advance for an earlier train wasn't he committing an offence getting the next one without getting another ticket first?
So a non-incident then.Well, I was on the train in question, the 14:55 Mancester to Euston via Crewe. I was sat in coach K in First and the first I heard was on arrival 10 mins late (told due to following late-running services from Birmingham from Watford Junction) to be met by a barrage of photographers and flashes on the platform. One asked me if I had been in First Class and if I had seen the incident involving GO.
I won't name names but the Liverpool-based TM was particularly cheerful and friendly as they checked tickets coming from coach J, with no obvious concerns. Neither did the friendly First Class hosts mention the incident either.
So a non-incident then.
Is that remotely relevant to anything?
But he's a Tory and people don't like him!
Before I go to bed, I see people now questioning whether he's going to claim the tickets on expenses. I'm not exactly sure what to think. If he was someone working for a normal company, I'd expect them to be able to claim - so is it any different when its the taxpayer? I mean, would I be expected to pay out of my own pocket to travel for work (as against to or from work)?
And for someone in his position who might have had to get back for an urgent meeting, would it have been better to have them sit in a Starbucks (okay, perhaps NOT a Starbucks!) until they could get their booked train - assuming they hadn't missed it?
As said above, I guess the answer to that won't be based on common sense but whether you're red or blue! However, in light of the publicity, I expect he won't put in a claim (straight away!).
Well someone won't have a job in the morning.
I had to laugh when Bob Crow waded in and said "....this shows how out of touch this ConDem government are..."
Ah yes, is this the same Bob Crow who is paid approx. £150,000 per year (a salary that most of us can only dream of) and yet lives in a Housing Association property where the rent is subsidised by the taxpayer?
As George Orwell said, "All men are equal, but some are more equal than others"
That would be Mitchell after an impeccably timed resignation (that the BBC swallowed - those accusing it of left wing bias take note)