• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Greater Anglia Rolling Stock Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,950
Presumably the reduced timetable nationally from next week will allow the removal of the mk3 sets?
 

168001

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2019
Messages
56
Location
Oxford
Have heard on the grape vine today might be the last day for the 90’s as next week GA are running a 2 hourly service and there is enough 745’s in service to cover the diagrams.
 

fat_boy_pete

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2015
Messages
291
Location
Essex
Have heard on the grape vine today might be the last day for the 90’s as next week GA are running a 2 hourly service and there is enough 745’s in service to cover the diagrams.
See the 745 thread. 6 units in service can cover the Sunday timetable operating from Monday. Might see a 90 over the weekend, but might not. Definitely not from Monday apparently.
 

KingJ

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2012
Messages
197
Based on a letter published by the DfT today, it would appear Greater Anglia were approached last year by the DfT about the feasibility of using some of the redundant Class 365s to solve the PRM-TSI compliance issue with their existing fleet.

The letter makes for interesting reading as to some of the challenges that would have been faced including the number of available units, driver/technician training and route clearance. Ultimately it concludes that given the small impact it would have had on overall compliance, the effort required would have been disproportionate and harmed the delivery timelines of the new fleet instead.

Definitely worth a read - https://assets.publishing.service.g..._data/file/873707/class-365-briefing-note.pdf
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,565
See the 745 thread. 6 units in service can cover the Sunday timetable operating from Monday. Might see a 90 over the weekend, but might not. Definitely not from Monday apparently.
Assuming all trains are pairs, the proposed service on the West Anglia routes will require 22 units. Normally there are 46 class 317 diagrams and 27 class 379 diagrams. So today could be the last day for non PRM 317s including the whole of the second series. It depends how long it takes to get some 720s up and running.
 

Bringback309s

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2013
Messages
314
Based on a letter published by the DfT today, it would appear Greater Anglia were approached last year by the DfT about the feasibility of using some of the redundant Class 365s to solve the PRM-TSI compliance issue with their existing fleet.

The letter makes for interesting reading as to some of the challenges that would have been faced including the number of available units, driver/technician training and route clearance. Ultimately it concludes that given the small impact it would have had on overall compliance, the effort required would have been disproportionate and harmed the delivery timelines of the new fleet instead.

Definitely worth a read - https://assets.publishing.service.g..._data/file/873707/class-365-briefing-note.pdf
Interesting, I didn't know it ever got that far
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
A single loco hauled set with 90004 on the front out today. The other diagrams fulfilled by 745s. 010 and 005 definitely in service.
 

43 302

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2019
Messages
1,624
Location
London
Was there ever an intention to run a farewell class 90 service pre-corona?
If Richard Clinnick is to be believed then yes there was a plan. Maybe we can get one later one. I'd like to see them on the WCML as well as the GEML maybe.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
2,858
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Based on a letter published by the DfT today, it would appear Greater Anglia were approached last year by the DfT about the feasibility of using some of the redundant Class 365s to solve the PRM-TSI compliance issue with their existing fleet.

The letter makes for interesting reading as to some of the challenges that would have been faced including the number of available units, driver/technician training and route clearance. Ultimately it concludes that given the small impact it would have had on overall compliance, the effort required would have been disproportionate and harmed the delivery timelines of the new fleet instead.

Definitely worth a read - https://assets.publishing.service.g..._data/file/873707/class-365-briefing-note.pdf
Thanks for bringing that to our attention - given other events its easy for things to slip under the radar at the moment!

I'd say section 3.2.c is the crucial bit - EMC with the signalling, and as mentioned the fact that it might take Network Rail to instigate a fix. Recent experience on the ECML suggests that would likely take a while to achieve.
 

Alfie1014

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,126
Location
Essex
Looks like today is the first day all 745 operated, with no 90s on the Norwich to Ingatestone shuttles.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,589
Location
East Anglia
According to the latest lines I've heard mentioned about the 720s, they are not running late and are taking the same amount of time to build as was expected to build, as there is no problem with the software, design of performance of these new trains.

The reason that the trains are not entering service on the previously estimated date, is because of an earlier batch of similar trains that were built for Transport for London had some issues with operating with the infrastructure on other lines and this meant that the building of the new units for Greater Anglia had to be pushed back, but there is no problem with the Greater Anglia units and the time it takes to build each train has not been delayed.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
According to the latest spin I've heard, the 720s are not running late and are taking the same amount of time to build as was expected to build, as there is no problem with the software, design of performance of these new trains.

The reason that the trains are not entering service on the previously estimated date, is because of an earlier batch of similar trains that were built for Transport for London had some issues with operating with the infrastructure on other lines and this meant that the building of the new units for Greater Anglia had to be pushed back, but there is no problem with the Greater Anglia units and the time it takes to build each train has not been delayed.
That first part isn't even spin, it's just straight up false. :D
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,589
Location
East Anglia
That first part isn't even spin, it's just straight up false. :D

Yes - it was a second hand source, but thought I'd share it!

It's interesting through if the issues are pushed to being the result of the TfL units issues though, rather than the fact that the estimates for these units were always way off in the first place, but that would give them some good PR cover.

Be interesting to see what tact is used later this year once the 360/379 fleets start going off lease, although saying that with the current situation it might not make anywhere near the impact we all feared.
 
Last edited:

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Yes - it was a second hand source, but thought I'd share it!

It's interesting through if the issues are pushed to being the result of the TfL units issues though, rather than the fact that the estimates for these units were always way off in the first place, but that would give them some good PR cover.

Be interesting to see what tact is used later this year once the 360/379 fleets start going off lease, although saying that with the current situation it might not make anywhere near the impact we all feared.

If they could point towards the TfL
It's hard to say - there will be far reduced demand for at least the next 6 months, but the general situation at the moment is likely to see PRM deadlines not enforced, yet on the other hand, a reduction (or total halt) to the commissioning, training and testing process. Between now and when people literally aren't allowed out of their homes, if that ever happens, is an opportunity to play catchup to reduce how far these units are behind the schedule they need to be on in order to replace the legacy stock. The question is how far can they catch up before things return to normal. It's not at all obvious at the moment.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,565
It's hard to say - there will be far reduced demand for at least the next 6 months, but the general situation at the moment is likely to see PRM deadlines not enforced, yet on the other hand, a reduction (or total halt) to the commissioning, training and testing process. Between now and when people literally aren't allowed out of their homes, if that ever happens, is an opportunity to play catchup to reduce how far these units are behind the schedule they need to be on in order to replace the legacy stock. The question is how far can they catch up before things return to normal. It's not at all obvious at the moment.
There are so many variables. Is the commissioning of new trains considered critical? How many of the people involved will go sick? It should be easy for AGA to run 100% PRM compliant from Tuesday after the last hauled set gets back to Norwich. However, if they park up all the non compliant units for a few months, they probably won't be very reliable if they need to be used again.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,399
Thanks for bringing that to our attention - given other events its easy for things to slip under the radar at the moment!

I'd say section 3.2.c is the crucial bit - EMC with the signalling, and as mentioned the fact that it might take Network Rail to instigate a fix. Recent experience on the ECML suggests that would likely take a while to achieve.
EMC with the signalling is also why they won't be coming back to 3rd rail land (1-16 were originally dual voltage)
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,399
Yes - it was a second hand source, but thought I'd share it!

It's interesting through if the issues are pushed to being the result of the TfL units issues though, rather than the fact that the estimates for these units were always way off in the first place, but that would give them some good PR cover.

Be interesting to see what tact is used later this year once the 360/379 fleets start going off lease, although saying that with the current situation it might not make anywhere near the impact we all feared.

If they could point towards the TfL

They have half the 5car Anglia units built already and the software is v. similar to the LO software hence once the LO software issues were sorted it has opened the flood gates to getting the Anglia units into service, from now on Anglia are most so the problem!

With reduced service levels and sensible planning a relatively quick roll out should be possible as extra paths are available for testing and training and less worry about unreliability of new stock as it will have less performance impact.
A 5car 720 is quite useful as it effectibvely has 6car capacity which should be more than enough for the time being. Hence cutting back on the 317/ non renatus 321s and then 360s should be relatively easy.

Stopping or virtually stopping all the 90+Mk3 set would reduce lots of maintenance requirement and help allow a focus on getting the rest of the 745 into action.
 

Shunter_69

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2014
Messages
478
Driver training will be a big issue with the 720’s. I’m not aware of any classroom training starting yet and I don’t think it’ll be able to start until virus restrictions are relaxed.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,942
Driver training will be a big issue with the 720’s. I’m not aware of any classroom training starting yet and I don’t think it’ll be able to start until virus restrictions are relaxed.

Why?

Must Classroom training be in a classroom? Why not do it over the internet, skype etc?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top