Agreed, this is very embarrassing for the industry.This will go down as one of the all time launch disasters. Will they never learn to keep it low profile?
Agreed, this is very embarrassing for the industry.
Yes but there's a difference between teething problems and pressing a train into service with air con leaking all of the floor.I don't agree, and I was there.
There are teething problems whenever new trains come into service - that's the same in any industry with brand new hardware. I'm not surprised there were technical problems - what they really need to do is fix them quickly for routine passenger service.
Yes but there's a difference between teething problems and pressing a train into service with air con leaking all of the floor.
And it is not as if there hasn't been a lot of trial running before the entry into service. How long ago is it that the first train arrived in the UK?Yes but there's a difference between teething problems and pressing a train into service with air con leaking all of the floor.
The first pre-series train arrived in the country on 11th March 2015: So two years, seven months ago. Though I've been doing some comparisons between the IEP and the original HST project for curiosity's sake and it took a similar amount of time for the prototype HST to enter regular service, and longer still before the production sets were launched (4 years 4 months from prototype 252001 being completed in June 1972 to 253001 entering service on 4th October 1976, though testing didn't start in earnest until January 1973).And it is not as if there hasn't been a lot of trial running before the entry into service. How long ago is it that the first train arrived in the UK?
This must be one of the most protracted fleet introductions ever and for this to happen on the first day of service IS embarrassing.
Rob
You've all got the wrong end of the stick here. Hitachi are trying to bring elements of Japanese culture to British rail travel.
There have been teething troubles with the on-board suikinkutsu but once these are addressed commuters will benefit from its relaxing sound.
It possibly is. I'm certainly not using the comparison as a practical yardstick, but it does highlight the fact that, in some ways at least, the launch of the class 800 is not necessarily "one of the most protracted fleet introductions ever". And with the new generation of rolling stock coming in to replace the HSTs it does make me think back to how they did things last time round. Plus the 800s aren't without their innovative features themselves, namely that bi-mode capability, and are no doubt vastly more electronically complex to boot.Aren't introduction timescale comparisons between the HST and IEP a bit 'apples and oranges'?
Plus the videos of seats roped off because the air con was leaking. They were floods - probably the first time anyone bothered testing the train with “super crush load” and the AC is going nuts because of all the extra warm bodies.
Going swimmingly, quite literally.
Slightly different question than the recent posts - where is the power socket in standard class? Always liked the fact that it was in the middle of the seats on the HST's, no having to lean over the person sat at the window seat to plug something in if you are in the aisle seat!
Slightly different question than the recent posts - where is the power socket in standard class? Always liked the fact that it was in the middle of the seats on the HST's, no having to lean over the person sat at the window seat to plug something in if you are in the aisle seat!
Sounds great!Got to give full marks to First for this launch. A seamless transition between old and new. Late, broken air con and train faults.
Am I right in saying there were paper reservation slips on the seats too rather than electronic?