AGA 170s are going to KAW franchise...
KAW rolling stock provision is decided so 185s will unlikely be drafted in.
To be fair, it should be W&B as that's the brand name they're having - Wales and Boarders.KAW Franchise? Who dat?
AGA 170s are going to KAW franchise...
KAW rolling stock provision is decided so 185s will unlikely be drafted in.
To be fair, it should be W&B as that's the brand name they're having - Wales and Boarders.KAW Franchise? Who dat?
I believe, based on posts on here, that they replaced the 323 power electronics with modern equivalents but didn't change the traction control software, which would have raised a lot more safety approval issues. The sound is down to how the software triggers the power electronics, not to the power electronics themselves.Since when? Still sound exactly the same as they did before.
Keep the spare trailers within franchise and use them to strengthen the 483s to 3 car units. DMSO(A) TSO(L)W DMSO(B)I guess with thameslink imminently running at maximum through the core, the 707's may not be needed, but making them 4-car could be a very useful fleet for lengthening 8 car units in the peak. Then the spare trailers could join the 321 trailers left over from the 320's!
Here are my suggestions but i don't expect it to happen
707 - Moving them to Northern for the Leeds - Doncaster/Bradford etc, Moving the 333's to manchester/liverpool replacing 319's.
458 - Move them to southern southcoast service replacing 313/377
350/2 / 360 - Move them to scotrail convert all to 3 car replacing those 318/320's, The spare coaches could then move to SWR to convert a number of 450's into 5 car concidering they are very similar it possible that could be done. The 5 car 360/2 could also move to Scotrail for its possible Edinburgh - Newcastle commuter. Similar story could be said with 365's with the coaches added on to 465/466's
379 - Move them to Midland Mainline Corby service.
Ex WMT/AGA 170 - Mjority of them could go to EMT Replacing all but 158's sprinters while the others could go to XC maybe Chiltern?
185 - Unless TPE takes over EMT's Liverpool - Nottingham section, They could moved to Wales exclusively for Llandudno - Manchester service or its future East/West rail link
MK4 - convert them to a push pull with 67/68 in a shorter formation (Loco +5/6 MK4+ DVT) Send them to Wales long distance service/EMT Liverpool - Norwich/Cross Country however according to Modern Railways (Volume 75, Number 837) Colchester based MAN is offering to upgrade EMT HST to allow them to work with the mk4's.
No they haven’t. You need to read the piece on page 36 of MR more carefully - they are most reliable of the new fleets recently introduced, which is something completely different.Ironic that the 707s have become the UKs most reliable EMU according to MR (Aug 18).
No they haven’t. You need to read the piece on page 36 of MR more carefully - they are most reliable of the new fleets recently introduced, which is something completely different.
Errrrrrrr, no it isn’t. By comparison with other fleets - see “Golden Spanners” data in January MR - reliability of the new fleets is poor. That’s why Roger Ford is highlighting their performance monthly.Im so rubbish at reading the small print Excellent performance though & good to see.
Errrrrrrr, no it isn’t. By comparison with other fleets - see “Golden Spanners” data in January MR - reliability of the new fleets is poor. That’s why Roger Ford is highlighting their performance monthly.
379s to EMR: could be upgraded to 110mph if the OLE was sufficiently meaty, to be used on the Corby services (like everyone seems to be keen on saying).
As to the 360s and 365s, I'm clueless.
My penn'orth:
458/5s to South Eastern Railway (as they'll be known next): this can allow the 377/5s to return to Southern, and allow the 465/9s to be withdrawn if First Class was added.
707s to SER: this can allow 30 pairings of 465 + 465 + 466 to be withdrawn.
379s to EMR: could be upgraded to 110mph if the OLE was sufficiently meaty, to be used on the Corby services (like everyone seems to be keen on saying).
387/3s to GWR: most likely course of action there too.
350/2s to SWR: infrastructure upgrades permitting, this could allow for more coaches to be used on services out of Waterloo. (Unlikely, given how constrained SWR's depot spaces are, and the inefficiency of the 3rd rail vice the OLE)
As to the 360s and 365s, I'm clueless.
There are several situations for which some of the stock being displaced would be very suitable, but the TOCs concerned either already have franchise agreements signed with the DfT and contracts with manufacturers for the necessary new stock (SWR for example), or they are drawing up bids according to the DfT's Invitation to Tender (e.g. South Eastern) with which the displaced stock is not compatible. The time for these ideas (most of them, anyway) has already gone by. Unfortunately.
If you read the SE Franchise tender documents (that effectively disqualify 458 and 707 unless modified, refurbished and length issues probably sorted) and the announcements from the 3 bidders there will be new Metro Stock supplied by Alstom (Stagecoach) or Hitachi (Govia & Abellio) that ain't happening.My penn'orth:
458/5s to South Eastern Railway (as they'll be known next): this can allow the 377/5s to return to Southern, and allow the 465/9s to be withdrawn if First Class was added.
707s to SER: this can allow 30 pairings of 465 + 465 + 466 to be withdrawn.
379s to EMR: could be upgraded to 110mph if the OLE was sufficiently meaty, to be used on the Corby services (like everyone seems to be keen on saying).
387/3s to GWR: most likely course of action there too.
350/2s to SWR: infrastructure upgrades permitting, this could allow for more coaches to be used on services out of Waterloo. (Unlikely, given how constrained SWR's depot spaces are, and the inefficiency of the 3rd rail vice the OLE)
As to the 360s and 365s, I'm clueless.
Given other issues e.g. new Timetable that they had to go back on then they have to keep some promises.I thought C2C buying new stock was a bit unnecessary for example. Surely it would have made more sense to have revisited their franchise promise and instead to acquire secondhand Electrostars from elsewhere. Now they'll have a large fleet of 20 year old trains plus a new smaller (and incompatible) fleet of Aventras.
Given other issues e.g. new Timetable that they had to go back on then they have to keep some promises.
I can see the notworkers heading for the scrapheap. They'll be almost 30 years old and not particularly reliable.Hi there,
Given talks about future Southeastern new trains as part of the next franchise, what will happen to the displaced stock ? If I understood correctly the bidders for the next franchise have all talked about new stock, hence my question.
40 years is the typical projected shelf life for electric stock (30 for diesel) so I'd hardly call them young.30 years old seems young but if they are that unreliable...
It appears new stock is becoming the norm with a new franchise...
I don't know.Is Northern receiving the discarded LM 323s ?
40 years is the typical projected shelf life for electric stock (30 for diesel) so I'd hardly call them young.
Many VEPs went for scrap when they were 30 years, and as for the 310/312s...