• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is train driving considered a skilled or semi skilled profession?

Is train driving considered a skilled or semi skilled profession?

  • Skilled

  • Semi Skilled


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,086
Bus drivers only take a few weeks because they have prior driving licence experience on the road, typically for some years; it is just a new vehicle under much the same regulations and environment. Back in the 1930s-50s the typical bus driver had no prior experience with a car, and it took much longer.

Having handled all of a car, bus, train, boat and aircraft, I can tell you that the aircraft needs far and away the most skill, and the boat comes second. The train is pretty straightforward in comparison nowadays, though I suspect a steam locomotive was up at aircraft levels.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,653
Bus drivers only take a few weeks because they have prior driving licence experience on the road, typically for some years; it is just a new vehicle under much the same regulations and environment. Back in the 1930s-50s the typical bus driver had no prior experience with a car, and it took much longer.

Having handled all of a car, bus, train, boat and aircraft, I can tell you that the aircraft needs far and away the most skill, and the boat comes second. The train is pretty straightforward in comparison nowadays, though I suspect a steam locomotive was up at aircraft levels.

Just to be clear - you’ve driven a train at 100 mph plus during hours of darkness or heavy fog with poor visibility etc ?
 

nottsnurse

Member
Joined
1 May 2014
Messages
275
Skilled - if the driver loses his attention, I may die.

As an Intensive Care nurse, if you were under my care and I didn't pay attention (such as if you were receiving a Noradrenaline infusion and it ran out) you would die, no may about it.

Who earns more? A train driver or Intensive Care nurse?

For fullness, a nurse is considered a 'skilled' occupation, whereas a train driver isn't.


There is also.a worldwide shortage of appropriately 5.9m nurses (according to the WHO).

I don't begrudge train drivers for getting the pay they have (nursing unions are traditionally very poor and nurses will often consider those their industrial action may affect, whereas rail workers likely don't), but it is quite a strange state of affairs when someone who literally has your life in their hands gets paid less than someone who, if a large amount of Swiss cheese slices line up, may cause your death if they don't have much of a self-presevation drive.
 
Last edited:

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,653
According to that list - scrolling down - a rail travel assistant is classed as skilled - but a train driver isn’t ?
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
3,263
Location
The West Country
In days of old I would definitely have said skilled. Multi-traction knowledge,faults and failures,goods and passenger work,different types of brake and often vast amounts of route knowledge. Now limited routes and traction and a fault line for failures. As for the actual driving,anyone can move a train but the skill is in stopping it!
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,489
Location
Norwich
I don't begrudge train drivers for getting the pay they have (nursing unions are traditionally very poor and nurses will often consider those their industrial action may affect, whereas rail workers likely don't), but it is quite a strange state of affairs when someone who literally has your life in their hands gets paid less than someone who, if a large amount of Swiss cheese slices line up, may cause your death if they don't have much of a self-presevation drive.

In the family friendly version of the saying, "everything before a but is a lie"...

Both roles are skilled in different ways and both roles are perfectly capable of killing people in a variety of ways if they make a mistake.
 

Astro_Orbiter

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2019
Messages
281
Location
UK
In the family friendly version of the saying, "everything before a but is a lie"...

Both roles are skilled in different ways and both roles are perfectly capable of killing people in a variety of ways if they make a mistake.
There is absolutely no reason to start comparing train drivers to anyone, least of all nurses. The jobs are not similar in any way, and this sort of baiting, especially during the pandemic, of comparing every role in the country to how poorly paid nurses are is frankly idiotic.
Completely different roles requiring entirely different skills and experience.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,226
Location
No longer here
Level 3 or A Level equivalent is the minimum standard for eligibility for a skilled worker visa (what replaced tier 2 visas in January). The salary threshold for a job that is not on skills shortage list is £25,600. Therefore a ToC would have very few problems sponsoring a migrant for a train drivers job. Its unlikely they would want to because of the level of interest from Brits but the job meets the criteria for skilled for purposes of immigration.
In response to this, and the OP's question, train guards, and several other railway ops grades, are eligible for skilled worker visas:

Retail service manager (railways)
Station assistant (underground railway)
Ticket inspector (railways)
Train conductor

Train manager

 
Last edited:

LCC106

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2011
Messages
1,304
I haven’t read any of the comments but I am aware anecdotally that one university professor sat a guard course and another a driver’s course from classroom to pass out. The one sitting the latter certainly said that what they were taught should be the equivalent of a degree sat over a far longer period. ***edited to add I consider that to be skilled***
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,961
Location
East Anglia
Very skilled indeed. How I balance all those wheels on the rail I will never know. I amaze myself everyday.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,873
Location
Plymouth
In days of old I would definitely have said skilled. Multi-traction knowledge,faults and failures,goods and passenger work,different types of brake and often vast amounts of route knowledge. Now limited routes and traction and a fault line for failures. As for the actual driving,anyone can move a train but the skill is in stopping it!
So Plymouth drivers are skilled in that case.
Routes are Penzance all the way to London including diversionaries, various branch lines, the complex depot at Laira too.
As for traction, 57s(basically the same as handling an old 47), 08s (1950s vintage), not to mention 1970s HSTs and more modern 80x Hitachis and sprinters as well, and even XC voyagers on the depot to boot . And don't forget the train management systems that we deal with on the 80x and voyagers.
All in all id say rather skilled......
 

Llanigraham

On Moderation
Joined
23 Mar 2013
Messages
6,103
Location
Powys
Bus drivers only take a few weeks because they have prior driving licence experience on the road, typically for some years; it is just a new vehicle under much the same regulations and environment. Back in the 1930s-50s the typical bus driver had no prior experience with a car, and it took much longer.

Having handled all of a car, bus, train, boat and aircraft, I can tell you that the aircraft needs far and away the most skill, and the boat comes second. The train is pretty straightforward in comparison nowadays, though I suspect a steam locomotive was up at aircraft levels.

Well I regularly steer a 68' boat, often into 7'6" wide holes and I wouldn't call that very skilled!
Now I wonder where everybody would classify a signaller?
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,444
Location
UK
Now I wonder where everybody would classify a signaller?

We pull levers, you push buttons. Only one of us has a fish tank to keep us nice and relaxed whilst the kettle boils...

Just to be clear - you’ve driven a train at 100 mph (deleted) during hours of darkness or heavy fog with poor visibility etc ?

I have, twasn't hard.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
3,263
Location
The West Country
So Plymouth drivers are skilled in that case.
Routes are Penzance all the way to London including diversionaries, various branch lines, the complex depot at Laira too.
As for traction, 57s(basically the same as handling an old 47), 08s (1950s vintage), not to mention 1970s HSTs and more modern 80x Hitachis and sprinters as well, and even XC voyagers on the depot to boot . And don't forget the train management systems that we deal with on the 80x and voyagers.
All in all id say rather skilled......
Yes but then you're HSS,compare that to GWR drivers. Do all PLY drivers sign 08s and Voyagers or is that just the drivers outstationed at LA? Even when 57s or Castles expire most drivers from whichever depot call control for advice because they are no longer expected to fault find.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,873
Location
Plymouth
Yes but then you're HSS,compare that to GWR drivers. Do all PLY drivers sign 08s and Voyagers or is that just the drivers outstationed at LA? Even when 57s or Castles expire most drivers from whichever depot call control for advice because they are no longer expected to fault find.
All Plymouth HSS drivers sign 08 and voyagers not just the Laira guys.
Its true that the GwR drivers are significantly underskilled at the moment but learning the other routes and traction is on the cards, just taking time thats all.
 

godfreycomplex

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2016
Messages
1,300
They have and use a skill, ergo they’re skilled.
One wonders if the nebulous division into skilled and unskilled is anything other than hugely damaging, a job either benefits society in some way (and the majority do) or it doesn’t
 

LRV3004

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2015
Messages
434
I find it difficult to believe that any job where the postholder has other people's lives literally in their hands can be anything but skilled. Pilots, boat captain, bus drivers, train drivers - all are surely skilled roles?
According to a certain news broadcast made last year, bus drivers aren’t skilled. That caused a rumpus afterwards that did………
Getting back on topic, I would class train driving as “specialised skills” - it’s certainly not an industry where if a train operator needed a driver, they could call an agency and say “we need X number of train drivers today”. Of course, freight operators do hire drivers from other companies when necessary; I’ve seen that happen a few times at our place.
 

Llanigraham

On Moderation
Joined
23 Mar 2013
Messages
6,103
Location
Powys
We pull levers, you push buttons. Only one of us has a fish tank to keep us nice and relaxed whilst the kettle boils...



I have, twasn't hard.

Cough!!
Some us still pull big levers.
I can think of atleast one traditional signal box that has an aquarium.

And we tell drivers what to do!:s
 

wobman

On Moderation
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,233
Very skilled indeed. How I balance all those wheels on the rail I will never know. I amaze myself everyday.
Especially on days like today, on low adhesion days driving a pair of 153's..... Where's that sander button gone in a dark cab lol
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,424
As for the actual driving,anyone can move a train but the skill is in stopping it!
Stopping it is easy, either apply the brakes or use a solid heavy obstruction.

Stopping it in exactly the right place and safely in varying conditions is the skilful bit I suspect.

There is absolutely no reason to start comparing train drivers to anyone, least of all nurses. The jobs are not similar in any way, and this sort of baiting, especially during the pandemic, of comparing every role in the country to how poorly paid nurses are is frankly idiotic.
Completely different roles requiring entirely different skills and experience.
I kind of agree but I wouldn't go as far to call it idiotic. Certain comparisons make you realise that our modern day capitalist system has it completely backward with what is valuable in the sense of humanity and monetary value. For example, compare how much it costs to go to a football match to the price of a bottle of water. Now consider never being allowed to go to a football match for the rest of your life vs not being allowed to drink water for the rest of your life. You could live with the former easily enough, and wouldn't suffer long in the latter because you would be dead within a week. Compare how much premier league football players are paid to nurses, then ask yourself whether premiership football players are really X times more valuable to society than nurses. It is because someone's salary is not reflected in their benefit to humanity, but the level of responsibility, how much skill/training is required, how much money they bring in, and how replacable they are (amongst other things).

It is the same reason we have unsuatainable resource depletion and environmental destruction. It doesn't show up on the monetary balance sheet, so it isn't classed as a cost, but it is if you look beyond money at the big picture.
 
Last edited:

Egg Centric

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
905
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
The definition of a skilled job is anything I do.

The definition of an unskilled job is anything I don’t

More seriously I think we need extremely detailed definitions of both to answer this. But the more detailed the definitions get I have to ask what the point in this differentiation is? Why does it matter?

I am 100% certain I could do a train driver’s job (if I went through a train driver’s training course) but I don’t see how that’s particularly informative and I certainly don’t consider myself “superior” in any way.

Am also 100% certain some train drivers could do my job (not really any courses available in quite the same way so far as I know but it can be learned)

Indeed there are examples of cross overs in both directions.
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,628
As an Intensive Care nurse, if you were under my care and I didn't pay attention (such as if you were receiving a Noradrenaline infusion and it ran out) you would die, no may about it.

Who earns more? A train driver or Intensive Care nurse?

For fullness, a nurse is considered a 'skilled' occupation, whereas a train driver isn't.


There is also.a worldwide shortage of appropriately 5.9m nurses (according to the WHO).

I don't begrudge train drivers for getting the pay they have (nursing unions are traditionally very poor and nurses will often consider those their industrial action may affect, whereas rail workers likely don't), but it is quite a strange state of affairs when someone who literally has your life in their hands gets paid less than someone who, if a large amount of Swiss cheese slices line up, may cause your death if they don't have much of a self-presevation drive.
Whilst I don't think comparing nurses to train drivers is particularly relevant, you're point about making a mistake potential killing someone is very true. However a nurse will kill one person, a mistake by a train driver could kill many people. Take Ladbroke Grove. 1 mistake by the driver cost 31 lives just like that. Nurses do a fabulous job, day in day out, but train drives also carry massive responsibility every journey. Mistakes are thankfully rare but can be highly catastrophic when they happen.
 

Fragezeichnen

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
305
Location
Somewhere
I'm not sure it's relevant to consider responsibility as relevant to skill. If you put someone in front of a button and tell them they have to press it every 5 minutes or there will be a explosion, that job is obviously responsible but not skilled.

My sense is that "skilled", refers mainly to jobs which require complex analysis, decision making and problem solving, and not to purely physical skills, even if they are not easy to master.

If you compare a Train Driver, who is expected to be fully productive and deal with all situations correctly on their first day driving alone, with a civil engineer will accumulate experience over decades and will gradually go from being responsible for a small part of project to a whole large project or many projects simulataneously, then I think that's clearly a different class of "skill".

Considering purely control of the traction and braking of the train I would not see that as "skilled". However, including also the complexity of the rulebook and operational situations which can occur, and that the driver must also deal with solving technical problems with the train, I think a Driver does count as "skilled".
 

Caboose Class

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2021
Messages
110
Location
YORK
In the skilled worker - eligible occupations, I notice that footballers aren't listed. So how come we have so many foreign footballers playing in this country?
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
I would argue anything that requires a licence to perform based on competency or requires qualifications to perform the task is a skilled worker.

It doesn't matter if 90% of the time the skilled worker is just pushing door closed buttons. Planes for example are highly automated the skills are there to respond appropriately when the automation goes wrong or the task requires specialist training to perform during an emergency.
 

XAM2175

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2016
Messages
3,469
Location
Glasgow
In the skilled worker - eligible occupations, I notice that footballers aren't listed. So how come we have so many foreign footballers playing in this country?
By way of the International Sportsperson visa, for a start.

 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,424
In the skilled worker - eligible occupations, I notice that footballers aren't listed. So how come we have so many foreign footballers playing in this country?
Because they play better than the UK players on average, which boosts a team's success, bringing in more money.
 

Caboose Class

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2021
Messages
110
Location
YORK
Because they play better than the UK players on average, which boosts a team's success, bringing in more money.
And I also notice that they must have at least £1,270 in their bank account to show they can support themselves in the UK. What, when some of these guys are on £50,000 a week or more? It's a complete joke! No wonder we haven't won Jack since 1966!!!!!!!
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,933
I say skilled. It's not the action of the job as such, but the understanding of the consequences of your actions, and being responsible for them.

Rough equivalence: My job involves a bit of mouse clicking and button pushing. But there is a constant reminder etched on the screen in front of me "the operator is responsible for patient radiation exposure and safety". That makes my computer keyboard tapping a skilled job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top