TheKnightWho
Established Member
Not so much having a bee in your bonnet, more having a whole swarm in your bearskin.
I wasn't aware that calling out hypocrisy was a bad thing.
Not so much having a bee in your bonnet, more having a whole swarm in your bearskin.
Pre-September 11 you could have said most terrorist attacks in Europe were carried out by people who would call themselves Catholics but they weren't reported like that - it was usually the IRA or ETA who were reported as being responsible. Yet when al-Qaeada or the ISIS are responsible people want to blame Muslims and eastern culture in general.
If you want to compare with previous terrorist activity then why not compare with the Gunpowder Plot? Guy Fawkes was seen as being the person responsible but a lot of historians find it almost impossible to believe that there weren't more people like him who he worked with.
His 'name', Antman
Maybe this single loser can keep England in the EU.
In June, far-right parties in the European Parliament announced the formation of a political group called the Europe of Nations and Freedoms (ENL) Group under the leadership of France's National Front. Establishing such a groupwhich gives the parties more staff, access to E.U. funds (at least 3 million Euros per year) and the right to initiate certain activitiesrequires at least 25 members from seven nations. In addition to the National Front, the ENL includes members from the Dutch Party for Freedom, Austria's Freedom Party, Italy's Northern League, the Belgian Flemish Interest Party, Polands Congress of the New Right and the United Romania Party, as well as a former member of Britains UKIP party.
Maybe this single loser can keep England in the EU.
Clutching at straws aren't you?
I fail to see how this horrific murder will make one jot of difference to the way people vote.
And? He didn't say that did he?Well yes but if he had claimed to be David Cameron would that link him to the conservative party?
It was light hearted, but does show a serious point - namely The Sun and others so keen to make sure not to show any link with (extreme) right wing views, and especially not any link to anything remotely 'leave' related.I'm not really sure why you've put this link on here other than as a piece of light hearted banter, personally I like the "Can I stay up here, it sounds really **** down there, asks Tim Peake" headline, the "Calls for UN to provide humanitarian aid to Southern Rail passengers" is obviously an indication of their journalistic intentions
Why do many people seem to think that the accused cannot have mental issues and have political issues at the same time?You were doing ok until you wrote that, but trying to score cheap political points at this time is not worthy.
This tragic incident is similar to the Leytonstone tube station one ie : Mental case attacks somebody, shouts something and everybody calls it terrorism, except it wasn't.
Well yes but if he had claimed to be David Cameron would that link him to the conservative party?
If someone claimed the earth wasn't flat I bet you would still argue the toss.
And? He didn't say that did he?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It was light hearted, but does show a serious point - namely The Sun and others so keen to make sure not to show any link with (extreme) right wing views, and especially not any link to anything remotely 'leave' related.
Another worthwhile contribution:roll:
Quite honestly I wouldn't take too much notice of what he said.
Quite honestly I wouldn't take too much notice of what he said.
Really? Someone gives their name as 'Death to traitors, freedom for Britain' and you shouldn't take too much notice?
And yes, pot and kettle do spring to mind here as well.
It was light hearted, but does show a serious point - namely The Sun and others so keen to make sure not to show any link with (extreme) right wing views, and especially not any link to anything remotely 'leave' related.
The bloke is mentally ill.
The leave campaign in general have been hesitant to make political capital out of Jo Cox's death. The remain side have had no such inhibitions.
So am I. What is your point?The bloke is mentally ill.
So am I. What is your point?
The bloke is mentally ill.
Instead of focusing their entire effort on distancing themselves from the killer and trying to discredit eyewitness accounts, perhaps it might have been better for the Britain First leadership to begin an investigation into whether Thomas Mair actually had any connections with their organisation before going into full-bore denial mode?
One place they could have started was their own website. The photograph above is from an article on the Britain First website celebrating the activities of their "Northern Division" in Dewsbury (just a few miles from Mair's home in Birstall). This is the link, but Internet illiterates often try to delete incriminating things from the Internet, so here's a copy saved on the Wayback Machine.
The bloke is mentally ill.
The bloke is mentally ill.
So am I. What is your point?
Yes, because it's true. I suffer from mental illness, I take drugs and have counselling to help, and so that I can live as normal a life as possible.Well you said it!
Possibly because a xenophobic murderer who killed an MP who was one of the greatest activists for the migrant crisis doesn't look great when you're running a campaign partially based on fear of migrants (as Farage has).
Has the murderer mentioned anything about the migrant crisis? Is there any evidence he even knew of Jo Cox's activist work? You seem absolutely certain that you know everything about the killer's motivation, that you understand exactly why Cox died. I just don't understand how you can be 100% sure what was going through his mind when the rest of us have only unanswered questions.
By making this statement I fear that you have absolutely no idea about Mental Illness, causes, symptoms, triggers etc.
Has the murderer mentioned anything about the migrant crisis? Is there any evidence he even knew of Jo Cox's activist work? You seem absolutely certain that you know everything about the killer's motivation, that you understand exactly why Cox died. I just don't understand how you can be 100% sure what was going through his mind when the rest of us have only unanswered questions.
Oh what and I suppose you're an expert? It's just a statement of fact, who knows I might be there one day?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Ahhh, some sanity at last
So am I. What is your point?
So he killed her for no reason at all, and shouted what he did for completely unrelated reasons?
I don't claim to know everything about the killer - I just don't buy this extreme scepticism by those who are worried that it may hurt Brexit's chances at the polls.
We don't fully understand the reasons yet, therefore it must have happened for no reason. Interesting logic.
You do claim to know that Jo Cox was killed because of her migrant activism...
I do not understand how it is somehow more respectful to decontextualise and fail to analyse the causes of someone's death. In fact, rewriting/ignoring facts so as to prevent such analysis is genuinely disrespectful, as it prevents us learning from what happened, from giving a true picture of what occurred, and it prevents the victim from being remembered for the real cause of their death - especially when she was killed for the very activism that she devoted her life to.
Has the murderer mentioned anything about the migrant crisis? Is there any evidence he even knew of Jo Cox's activist work?
You don't have to answer, of course, but it does undermine the credibility of your argument if you leave these questions unanswered.