• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Likely consequences of stopping short

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harlesden

Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
968
Location
LONDON NW10
If a person is detected stopping short on an Advance ticket, is it likely to become a prosecution issue or is the offender simply prevented from leaving the station and put onto the next train to the destination on the ticket?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,756
Location
Airedale
Neither. They are normally required to pay the appropriate walk up fare for their actual journey, though staff may show discretion.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
By asking the question "if a person is detected" then we should assume that you specifically want to exclude circumstances in which the passenger has asked for, and been given permission, to leave the train before the contracted destination, and that you are only concerned with situations in which the passenger had hoped to avoid detection.

There would be no point in requiring the passenger to board the next train - they wouldn't have a valid ticket for that journey - the terms of the contract would already have been broken.

Please see the Forum's Fares & Ticketing Guide, here for a discussion of 'break of journey' which is not permitted when travelling on Advance ticket types.

Where there is little or no loss of revenue to the Railway Company incurred by the passenger having used an Advance ticket to a more distant station rather a ticket to the actual point of alighting, then we would expect that no action would be taken - perhaps just advice that it is not strictly permitted. Guidance was published a few years ago to advise that prosecution should not be pursued if there was no indication of significant loss to the industry. Unfortunately, that wording is open to interpretation, and of course a loss of just a few pounds could be 'significant' if it was a regular habit over 500 commuiting journeys each year.

It is not something that should be encouraged, and it remains a breach of the contract terms, which are quite clear and doing so could justify a prosecution if the proper fare for the actual journey taken is not paid on demand. But if there is a one-off incident or emergency which prompts the wish to abandon a journey early, then it would be appropriate to ask for permission and for that permission to be granted.
 
Last edited:

Tubeboy

Member
Joined
9 May 2009
Messages
477
Location
London
On one occasion, I bought a London to Lichfield advance, but alighted at Tamworth as there was a road traffic accident at Lichfield. The price was exactly the same. Technically not allowed, but I didn't feel bad about it. I still paid the railway.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,331
Location
Scotland
The price was exactly the same. Technically not allowed, but I didn't feel bad about it. I still paid the railway.
You're correct that technically it wasn't allowed but the railway industry guidance is to take no action if the customer isn't 'cheating' the system.
 

westv

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2013
Messages
4,363
I suppose that, if you know in advance that'll you'll need to stop short, then it'd be best in a lot of cases to purchase a single from your original destination to the alighting station.
 

exile

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2011
Messages
1,336
Since tickets are rarely checked on exiting a station (not the ones I use anyway!) I'm not sure how stopping short can be detected anyway.
 

kieron

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2012
Messages
3,203
Location
Connah's Quay
I suppose that, if you know in advance that'll you'll need to stop short, then it'd be best in a lot of cases to purchase a single from your original destination to the alighting station.
One from the stop before yours would be less likely to attract suspicion, in the unlikely event that something other than a barrier looks at your ticket after you alight.

It'd be best, legally speaking, to obtain a ticket which is valid for your actual journey. I don't feel the rules for dealing with a situation where you have the wrong ticket unintentionally, or the publicity given to them, are very good at persuading the average passenger to do the right thing when something like that happens, though.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
73,596
Location
Yorkshire
Neither. They are normally required to pay the appropriate walk up fare for their actual journey, though staff may show discretion.
They can be sold an excess* to such a fare, yes.

But I am not sure that is what normally happens; staff are instructed not to charge anything except where the price to the station actually travelled to would have been a higher fare. It's very rare to hear of cases where passengers have been excessed, but such cases are enjoyed by the media (and the TOCs do not like the results, hence the instructions to staff not to do it!)

(* Sorry if that sounds pedantic; I am sure you meant an excess, but I am just clarifying for anyone who wasn't sure!)
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,756
Location
Airedale
They can be sold an excess* to such a fare, yes.

(* Sorry if that sounds pedantic; I am sure you meant an excess, but I am just clarifying for anyone who wasn't sure!)

No I didn't TBH, because I didn't realise the rules had changed so much in the passenger's favour, so thanks for pointing the error out.
 

exile

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2011
Messages
1,336
Sorry, I didn't realise posters on this forum are required to limit themselves to situations that would only apply to you.

I didn't realise posters on this forum are required to limit themselves to situations that would only apply to YOU (that is, stations with staffed barriers). The vast majority of stations do not have staffed barriers.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Manual barriers.

No, none of those either. I realise this makes me look like I live in Greenland or somewhere but barriers are extremely rare beasts in my area!
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,331
Location
Scotland
I didn't realise posters on this forum are required to limit themselves to situations that would only apply to YOU (that is, stations with staffed barriers). The vast majority of stations do not have staffed barriers.
The stations used by the majority of passengers do, however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top