• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

London Tube driver invited female passenger into his cab and sexually assaulted her while stinking of cannabis and suggesting they 'Netflix and chill'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
1,400
Location
London
Not seen this covered here yet (apols if so):


Daily Mail link warning:

Daily Mail article

London Tube driver invited female passenger into his cab and sexually assaulted her while stinking of cannabis and suggesting they 'Netflix and chill' on the Jubilee line, court hears​

  • Nathaniel Cummings-Stewart denies sexual assault after he was reported to BTP
  • He is also accused of suggesting he return to her hotel to 'Netflix and chill'
  • She thought the defendant could be 'trusted' as he was wearing a TfL uniform
By TOM PYMAN FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 13:00, 18 June 2022 | UPDATED: 13:02, 18 June 2022






  • e-mail
228shares


A Tube driver invited a female passenger into his cab and sexually assaulted her while stinking of cannabis, a court has heard.
Nathaniel Cummings-Stewart allegedly told the woman to join him by the driver's seat before touching her thigh and making sexual comments.
The 46-year-old from Brent, north London, is accused of turning the lights off within the driver cab, of suggesting he return to her hotel to 'Netflix and chill' and of smelling like he'd recently been smoking cannabis.

Cummings-Stewart has denied a single count of sexual assault after he was reported to the British Transport Police.
Nathaniel Cummings-Stewart allegedly told the woman to join him by the driver's seat before touching her thigh and making sexual comments

+3
View gallery
Nathaniel Cummings-Stewart allegedly told the woman to join him by the driver's seat before touching her thigh and making sexual comments
Jurors at Inner London Crown Court heard the woman had travelled to London with her friend for a long weekend, and had been staying at a hotel near Waterloo.
On August 21, 2020, she travelled to Wembley Boxpark to meet with friends and decided to return to Central London later that evening.
In order to avoid missing the last train, the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was walked by her friend to the nearest station to board the Jubilee line shortly after midnight.
After arriving, she was approached by Cummings-Stewart who, the court heard, had asked 'Which stop are you going to?', and invited her into the driver's cab.
She told the court that being unfamiliar with London, she thought he was someone 'to be trusted' as he was in a TfL uniform.
She claimed that he smelled of cannabis, telling the jurors: 'It was strong, it must have been recent [that he'd been smoking].'

RELATED ARTICLES​

SHARE THIS ARTICLE​

Share
She said she sat next to him as he worked the controls of the train. During the course of the journey to Waterloo, he asked her questions about her visit to London, the location of her hotel and asked her to remove her Covid-19 mask, she claims.
The woman claims that he 'turned the lights off, closed the blinds and locked the door' and began to suggest that he would come to her hotel after his shift ended in two hours.
He also told her he wanted to shower and 'Netflix and chill' with her, before taking her phone and insisting that she accept his number, the court was told.
The woman told jurors that she had felt 'uncomfortable' and had refused to give her own number and told him she was 19, before texting her friend which failed to send due to signal problems.
Whilst they were travelling between Tube stations, she said he reached over to give her a high five, before beginning to touch her upper thigh.
After arriving at Waterloo station, the woman said she insisted that it was her stop and she left through a side door.
The 46-year-old from Brent, north London, is accused of turning the lights off within the driver cab, of suggesting he return to her hotel to 'Netflix and chill' and of smelling like he'd recently been smoking cannabis

+3
View gallery
The 46-year-old from Brent, north London, is accused of turning the lights off within the driver cab, of suggesting he return to her hotel to 'Netflix and chill' and of smelling like he'd recently been smoking cannabis
Speaking of her reaction to the incident, she said: 'My heart was beating really, really quickly; as soon as I got out of the platform I was jogging, my heart was pounding.'
She said she confided in her mum a few days later and reported him to Transport for London Customer Services.
Jurors heard the recorded call, where she described his behaviour as 'inappropriate' and said: 'I got really scared, I didn't know what was going to happen and I really did fear for what was going to happen.'
Taking the witness stand, her mum tearfully said: 'She was sat at the table, I was cooking, I believe, and I knew something was wrong, she's my daughter.
'I could see she wanted to tell me something. The way she looked, the way she was looking at me, her whole posture. She brought it up. She said she had something to tell me.
'My gut feeling was something had happened with a man and she's going to tell me something that I don't want to hear. She then tried to explain what happened.
'From what I can remember she said something had happened on the Tube and she said a man touched her. The first thing I asked her was 'were you raped' because that's my first fear, and she broke down and cried..'
She continued: 'She then said he said to her where is she staying, she said where she was staying and what she was doing in London, he then suggested that he could come back to the hotel with her to have sex and he would shower off and no one would know.
'She then said she was so scared she told him he was younger than her age, hoping that would scare him off and he would leave her alone. He took her phone and put his number in her phone and told her to call him.'
Cummings-Stewart has denied the allegation and claimed that he first approached the woman because she looked like his sister, and invited her into the cockpit because she appeared 'distressed'.
In order to avoid missing the last train, the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was walked by her friend to the nearest station to board the Jubilee line shortly after midnight. After arriving, she was approached by Cummings-Stewart who, the court heard, had asked 'Which stop are you going to?', and invited her into the driver's cab

+3
View gallery
In order to avoid missing the last train, the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was walked by her friend to the nearest station to board the Jubilee line shortly after midnight. After arriving, she was approached by Cummings-Stewart who, the court heard, had asked 'Which stop are you going to?', and invited her into the driver's cab
He claimed that she told him she was being followed, which the woman told jurors 'was not true at all'.
Under Transport for London guidance, drivers are not permitted to allow passengers into the cockpit before contacting controls or a manager.
During his police interview, Cummings-Stewart said he 'overlooked' that guidance but had wanted to ensure her protection.
He also denied smoking cannabis or consuming any alcohol or drugs whilst driving the train.
The trial continues.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
I wonder how long after the event this was reported, if soon I would have expected a drug test have been done, also on train cctv would show if she entered the cab and platform cctv may also pick up if there was someone in there.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,338
I wonder how long after the event this was reported, if soon I would have expected a drug test have been done, also on train cctv would show if she entered the cab and platform cctv may also pick up if there was someone in there.

From the article:

She said she confided in her mum a few days later and reported him to Transport for London Customer Services.

My understanding is that "a few days" would still be within the period to detect Cannabis, but it would rather depend whether the investigating LU manager thought this was appropriate, and whether of course the individual was at work during this time.
 

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
664
Is there CCTV in the cabs? Or some equivalent of a Cockpit Voice Recorder from a plane, etc?
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,418
Location
London
Is there CCTV in the cabs? Or some equivalent of a Cockpit Voice Recorder from a plane, etc?

If it’s like the mainline, no. However, as above, there would be CCTV in the passenger saloons and on the platforms and would likely pick up someone being asked into the cab. Absent a dire emergency there really isn’t any legitimate reason for doing so, so I’d imagine that would be pretty determinative.
 

baz962

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2017
Messages
3,319
He admitted to having her in the cab , according to the article.
 

Tallguy

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2011
Messages
361
Platform CCTV should capture the lady entering and exiting the cab. Some stations have a camera pointed at the cab too..
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
If it’s like the mainline, no. However, as above, there would be CCTV in the passenger saloons and on the platforms and would likely pick up someone being asked into the cab. Absent a dire emergency there really isn’t any legitimate reason for doing so, so I’d imagine that would be pretty determinative.
There are some cases where people are invited into the cab legitimately but this needs to be cleared with control
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
I remember seeing a tube documentary where some engineers (and the camera crew) ride in a Central line cab, to jump out the front and fix a cable for the OPO in-cab camera antenna.
I saw a similar documentary where the eru removes a fox from the track after riding in a train
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,397
Location
0035
I remember seeing a tube documentary where some engineers (and the camera crew) ride in a Central line cab, to jump out the front and fix a cable for the OPO in-cab camera antenna.
That was different, they would have advised the controller because they wanted track access.

As an aside the show is on YouTube, if anyone wants to see the moment it’s at 8m 06s:
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,418
Location
London
There are some cases where people are invited into the cab legitimately but this needs to be cleared with control

On the mainline it’s basically limited to cab pass holders, managers, instructors and other drivers.

I must admit I struggle to imagine any scenario where it would be appropriate to invite anyone else in.

Usually it's cases where kids have had a prearranged cab ride. Usually on ato only lines.

Hardly the same scenario is it.

That was different, they would have advised the controller because they wanted track access.

As an aside the show is on YouTube, if anyone wants to see the moment it’s at 8m 06s:

I love how they made Jacky walk over a genuine live rail. That was considered far too dangerous when I did my PTS!
 

DavyCrocket

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
616
Why is there no “result” yet? This sounds a pretty straightforward case. Reporting restrictions perhaps?
I suspect that the case was unable to be concluded on that one day and it is now listed for another day. Criminal justice system is in such a mess and delays are ludicrous.
I am involved in a case that has tried to be heard and is part heard months apart and was first listed in September last year for something in many months before that.

I wonder what action so far has been taken against the staff member by employer
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,774
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I suspect that the case was unable to be concluded on that one day and it is now listed for another day. Criminal justice system is in such a mess and delays are ludicrous.
I am involved in a case that has tried to be heard and is part heard months apart and was first listed in September last year for something in many months before that.

I wonder what action so far has been taken against the staff member by employer

On the latter point, one would expect the member of staff to be suspended pending completion of an investigation, at some point during which he’d be being called in for an interview to answer questions and offer his version of events.
 
Last edited:

Egg Centric

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
907
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
I suspect that the case was unable to be concluded on that one day and it is now listed for another day. Criminal justice system is in such a mess and delays are ludicrous.
I am involved in a case that has tried to be heard and is part heard months apart and was first listed in September last year for something in many months before that.

I wonder what action so far has been taken against the staff member by employer

At this point though this case is in front of jurors. I'm not saying you're wrong but I would be surprised if a case with jurors can be delayed more than a couple of days, for the obvious attendance difficulty reasons if nothing else. But perhaps I'm naive.
 

DavyCrocket

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
616
At this point though this case is in front of jurors. I'm not saying you're wrong but I would be surprised if a case with jurors can be delayed more than a couple of days, for the obvious attendance difficulty reasons if nothing else. But perhaps I'm naive.
Oh yes. I had missed it was Crown.
In which case the jury would have to be dismissed and relisted.
But unusual that no update given (although the strike had ended)
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
Platform CCTV should capture the lady entering and exiting the cab. Some stations have a camera pointed at the cab too..
On train CCTV should show this, not platform
There are some cases where people are invited into the cab legitimately but this needs to be cleared with control

Like what?
I had a passenger having a panic attack in the cab with me on one occasion, along with her boyfriend, when having to do a wrong direction move following a one under involving the train ahead of mine, the controller gave permission for this providing I was happy with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top