TheEastCoaster
Established Member
- Joined
- 26 Jun 2018
- Messages
- 1,259
I agree. I mean it’s possible that they could extend the 22 back to Ocean Terminal but the route could go Leith Street, Leopold Place, London Road, Meadowbank, Willowbrae Road, Milton Road/West/East left at the traffic lights past Eastfield at Joppa and past Portobello, Seafield, Bernard Street, Commercial Street and Ocean Terminal.
The 26 and 44 could be changed so that they remain on Waterloo Place and Regent Road and the 22 extension would cover Leopold Place to Portobello/Joppa and possibly the 45 if it is put back to Leopold Place.
This would also allow people on the 22 route albeit a long route to Ocean Terminal still and it wouldn’t affect the tram as they would just promote it as “the quick way to Ocean Terminal from Gyle”.
I’ll be honest, it wouldn’t be that far fetched for Lothian to consider that as an option since the 22 was a pretty popular service prior to being cut, bring the 22 back to Leith, provide portobello and ocean terminal a link and then still have the tram as an option for a faster link to town! it’s a win-win, but i still like to see the 12, 200, 140 as possible extension options also!
On the subject, a Brunstane to Portobello link would also be nice, much like when the 21 was diverted when Brighton Place was closed, maybe that’s something we could see in the cards too? that or a Fort Kinnaird to Brunstane link, i was gutted when the 118 was curtailed back to Musselburgh when the Fort Kinnaird/Edinburgh College extension got cut, I would of thought it would of done well! maybe the timings were too awkward for students that it barely say any demand!