• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lothian Group discussion (Lothian City, Lothian Country Bus and East Coast Buses)

Porty

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2020
Messages
154
Location
Edinburgh
Sorry, but hard disagree. Unfortunately councillors disagreed.

Stop spacing in Edinburgh and the Lothians is just ridiculous. The fact that the 20mph limit didn't slow schedules down is the biggest red flag that stops are too close together and poorly sited. I hate saying London has it better, but even Glasgow does stop spacing better.
Yet some stops are a long way apart - and stops (with a retained shelter) have been closed for no obvious reason. The southbound stop on George IV Bridge, close to Chambers Street, comes to mind. Especially as the National Museum of Scotland is a key destination and is close by. It's quite a long distance between the stop outside the National Library and Lauriston Place.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

NorthEastern

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2023
Messages
45
Location
Alnmouth
Given the general traffic speed in Edinburgh city centre you are as well getting off and walking rather than crawling along on the bus to the stop, if it were open.
 
Joined
29 Nov 2018
Messages
705
Sorry, but hard disagree. Unfortunately councillors disagreed.

Stop spacing in Edinburgh and the Lothians is just ridiculous. The fact that the 20mph limit didn't slow schedules down is the biggest red flag that stops are too close together and poorly sited. I hate saying London has it better, but even Glasgow does stop spacing better.
Quite correct in my opinion. Stop spacing in Edinburgh's city centre seems reasonable and maybe slightly on the sparse side with work on North Bridge and the tram constraints. But I believe many stops are too close together in areas where traffic moves freely and buses need to stop for lone travellers.
The process for loading and unloading has slowed a lot since the days when the bus didn't even come to a halt and passengers would jump on or off the platform. I reckon rationalising stops would improve journey times better than many bus lane schemes.
 

oldman

Member
Joined
26 Nov 2013
Messages
1,160
The fact that the 20mph limit didn't slow schedules down is the biggest red flag that stops are too close together and poorly sited. I hate saying London has it better, but even Glasgow does stop spacing better.
A lot of 20 mph limits have been applied to streets where it would be hard to go faster anyway - many of the 'main' roads are still 30.

Edinburgh's problems are narrow roads for modern vehicles, too much on-street parking, lots of traffic signals, a lack of routes avoiding the city centre, little bus priority poorly enforced, etc. No doubt there are cases where stops could be improved, but to see it as a major solution is wrong, and the down side for some passengers is obvious.
 

NorthEastern

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2023
Messages
45
Location
Alnmouth
Quite correct in my opinion. Stop spacing in Edinburgh's city centre seems reasonable and maybe slightly on the sparse side with work on North Bridge and the tram constraints. But I believe many stops are too close together in areas where traffic moves freely and buses need to stop for lone travellers.
The process for loading and unloading has slowed a lot since the days when the bus didn't even come to a halt and passengers would jump on or off the platform. I reckon rationalising stops would improve journey times better than many bus lane schemes.
The reference to boarding and alighting being faster in the old days is correct, you can find YouTube videos of buses in Princes St in the past where the dwell time is only about 2 seconds!
 

FlybeDash8Q400

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
2,254
Location
Edinburgh
Isn’t the argument for keeping dual door operation valid in these cases? Richard Hall might have been pretty unpopular across the board, but this was one of the few ideas that actually had basis to work.
 

Baileygirl

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2019
Messages
256
Location
livingston
Isn’t the argument for keeping dual door operation valid in these cases? Richard Hall might have been pretty unpopular across the board, but this was one of the few ideas that actually had basis to work.
The argument against the two door layout is both safety and to stop fare dodging by people jumping on while the doors are open
 

stevenedin

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2021
Messages
1,564
Location
Edinburgh
The argument against the two door layout is both safety and to stop fare dodging by people jumping on while the doors are open
They have cameras at the rear doors and it says "Warning exit doors closing" plus I've always seen the driver wait until after all passengers are on before closing the doors.

I haven't seen anyone get on the rear doors. I don't think that the savings from fare dodgers not getting on will be as much as the savings from reliability that will attract more passengers to board if journeys are quicker.
 

NorthEastern

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2023
Messages
45
Location
Alnmouth
They have cameras at the rear doors and it says "Warning exit doors closing" plus I've always seen the driver wait until after all passengers are on before closing the doors.

I haven't seen anyone get on the rear doors. I don't think that the savings from fare dodgers not getting on will be as much as the savings from reliability that will attract more passengers to board if journeys are quicker.
Agreed. It’s crazy that Lothian doesn’t specify dual doors. European city buses have 2-3 doors commonly.
 

CN04NRJ

Established Member
Joined
28 Nov 2019
Messages
1,856
Location
UK
The argument against the two door layout is both safety and to stop fare dodging by people jumping on while the doors are open

Really easy to monitor with the camera switching to the rear doors when they're open, I shut them as soon as I'm sure the last passenger has alighted. 99% of people who try to get in through the back door are unfamiliar tourists.
 
Joined
29 Nov 2018
Messages
705
fare dodging by people jumping on while the doors are open
A lot of bus journeys are probably free either through concessions or capping, so it doesn't make much sense to either fare dodge in the first place or eschew the benefits of exit doors to preserve revenue.

99% of people who try to get in through the back door are unfamiliar tourists.
I imagine out of the small number who know it's not the correct boarding process, many are just trying to bypass the queue rather than avoid a £2.20 fare.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,467
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
I think given the relatively high general bus usage in Edinburgh plus the increasingly frequent numbers of times a year when the city is stretched to and beyond capacity for gigs and events and festivals that double door operation is the only sensible way forward on all except possibly airport vehicles.
 

Porty

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2020
Messages
154
Location
Edinburgh
That’s at most a 5min walk, which means you are always within 2.5min of a bus stop, on what planet does that count as far
Google Maps suggest a 6 minute walk of 0.3 miles. That's a long way for some mobility impaired people, especially when there are big attractors for visitors half way between the stops - and a former stop with a shelter. It's also 0.3 miles from the preceding southbound stop on The Mound, but there's nowhere practical to have an additional stop, yet it's only 140 yards to the preceding stop on Hanover Street.
 

Top