• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Manchester Metrolink - Airport line

Status
Not open for further replies.

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
I'm of the view that Cornbrook is only temporary until Deansgate is finished, Deansgate offers a better terminus since you have direct heavy rail services to Piccadilly and other destinations, the free buses and none free buses as well as the same high frequency of trams.

The wording of the press release doesn't seem to support this view. Maybe D-C will be needed for turning trams on other routes when St Peter's Square is being worked on.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
The wording of the press release doesn't seem to support this view. Maybe D-C will be needed for turning trams on other routes when St Peter's Square is being worked on.
Perhaps, will SPS we a Victoria style affair with only one line through the site and the station closed or will it we different?
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,932
Location
St Neots
How do you think that future users in the said area will feel, when they will be required to change trams at Cornbrook, when they receive this news ?

They probably won't like it very much at all!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Perhaps, will SPS we a Victoria style affair with only one line through the site and the station closed or will it we different?

Some spray paint has appeared on Oxford Street indicating the future alignment — I've not examined it in detail but it slews quite a bit south of the current running lines so I would imagine it could mainly be done with weekend closures.
 
Last edited:

familyguy99

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2011
Messages
981
Location
Oldham
As many of your will know (from SCC thread) tram testing took place on Airport line last night/early this morning with 3052+3061 double trams went from St Werburgh's Road to Sale Water Park on first gauge testing, testing will continued on Airport line (only as far as Sale Water Park) tonight and tomorrow night then it resumed again in Mid of July for testing to Wythenshawe. (that rumour off SCC thread)
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,932
Location
St Neots
As many of your will know (from SCC thread) tram testing took place on Airport line last night/early this morning with 3052+3061 double trams went from St Werburgh's Road to Sale Water Park on first gauge testing, testing will continued on Airport line (only as far as Sale Water Park) tonight and tomorrow night then it resumed again in Mid of July for testing to Wythenshawe. (that rumour off SCC thread)

Was that using the diesel MPV, or self-propelled from the OHLE power?
 

familyguy99

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2011
Messages
981
Location
Oldham
Was that using the diesel MPV, or self-propelled from the OHLE power?

They were running by they own power for testing on Airport line, Metrolink/MPT only ever use diesel locomotives for gauge testing on line to Oldham Mumps (temporary) and line to St Werburgh's Road as all rest have been tram running is own power.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
The overhead wire is now up throughout the airport line, though still on temporary support arrangements in places.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
On Skyscrapercity, martin2345uk has posted the first picture of a test tram going over the Mersey Valley viaduct. It's also the first daylight picture of a tram on the airport line.
 
Last edited:

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,555
The wording of the press release doesn't seem to support this view. Maybe D-C will be needed for turning trams on other routes when St Peter's Square is being worked on.

How feasible would it be to four track the route between Cornbrook and Deansgate along the old viaduct to Manchester Central and build a couple of terminal platforms.

I remember when it opened in 1992 that the tickets there had "G-Mex (Central)" on them.

If its going to be a terminus again perhaps Deansgate ought to be renamed Manchester Central?
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
How feasible would it be to four track the route between Cornbrook and Deansgate along the old viaduct to Manchester Central
Where there are two viaducts side by side, Metrolink chose to use the one that needed less repair work. The other has been continuing to rot for 20 years since then. So I think it would be expensive.

and build a couple of terminal platforms.
It's already getting a third platform, which should tide it over until the Second City Crossing opens. Then presumably both Cornbrook and D-C will revert to seeing only through services when in normal operation.

If its going to be a terminus again perhaps Deansgate ought to be renamed Manchester Central?
I would suggest not subjecting it to a second renaming for a purely temporary function.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
How feasible would it be to four track the route between Cornbrook and Deansgate along the old viaduct to Manchester Central and build a couple of terminal platforms.

If its going to be a terminus again perhaps Deansgate ought to be renamed Manchester Central?

Not very because you'd need to strengthen the viaduct further, build new platforms at Cornbrook (and therefore remodel Cornbrook junction), refurbish the second bird cage, move all the OHLE on the main viaduct, remodel DGCF further and build more new platforms which would only be used every so often because Deansgate isn't planned to be a terminal for anything but merely providing terminating facilities should they be needed as well as provide more capacity into st. Peters Square for 2CC. It's already getting a third platform there's no need for further building

What is the point? Seriously, Deansgate-Castelfield reflects the area better than Manchester Central does. It's not going to be a terminus again, it will see trams terminate there during the SPS rebuild and in the event of disruption but there's not going to be a dedicated service terminating at DGCF. It'd be like saying that about Timperly, just because trams can terminate there doesn't mean it's going to be a terminus like Altrincham it's just to improve reliably and flexibility.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,611
Location
Yorkshire
Though it would perhaps make sense for the heavy rail side of DGCF to have 'Castlefield' added so that the two sides match...
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,781
Location
Nottingham
Though it would perhaps make sense for the heavy rail side of DGCF to have 'Castlefield' added so that the two sides match...

Deansgate isn't a great name considering it's beyond the south end of Deansgate, which is a very long street and most of it is closer to Salford Central or Victoria.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,076
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Deansgate isn't a great name considering it's beyond the south end of Deansgate, which is a very long street and most of it is closer to Salford Central or Victoria.

Perhaps the heavy rail station should revert back to its former name of Knott Mill and Deansgate in that case.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It's already getting a third platform, which should tide it over until the Second City Crossing opens.

Why do I always think of the return of Jesus when I see that particular line title...:oops:
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,932
Location
St Neots
Not very because you'd need to strengthen the viaduct further, build new platforms at Cornbrook (and therefore remodel Cornbrook junction), refurbish the second bird cage, move all the OHLE on the main viaduct, remodel DGCF further and build more new platforms.

You forgot "rip out the Cornbrook pocket siding".
 

gnolife

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Messages
2,044
Location
Johnstone
Small update: Tram testing has reached as far as the M56 bridge in Wythenshawe, having seen a double tram parked up while being driven under.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,146
Location
Bolton
From the car:
 

Attachments

  • 2014-07-31 11.46.03.jpg
    2014-07-31 11.46.03.jpg
    94 KB · Views: 61
  • 2014-07-31 11.46.09.jpg
    2014-07-31 11.46.09.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 47

familyguy99

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2011
Messages
981
Location
Oldham
For anyone who doesn't know tram testing took place to Wythenshawe Town Centre (I think they went as far as Robinswood Road stop but not sure) last week (July 29th to Aug 5th) and small rumour on SCC website that testing to Airport may happen by end of this month so good progress is happening with testing on Airport line. :)
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,076
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
For anyone who doesn't know tram testing took place to Wythenshawe Town Centre (I think they went as far as Robinswood Road stop but not sure) last week (July 29th to Aug 5th) and small rumour on SCC website that testing to Airport may happen by end of this month so good progress is happening with testing on Airport line. :)

I believe that Shadowmoss Road will see some line testing by the trams next week, from what I have heard.
 

gnolife

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Messages
2,044
Location
Johnstone
I wonder why they feel the need to put Manchester Airport as opposed to just Airport on the front - or is there something in planning for an extension to Stansted? :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top