• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern Line

Status
Not open for further replies.

Buttsy

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
1,365
Location
Hanborough
Not sure if this is the right section for this.

As the Charing Cross branch is to be cut short at Kennington the majority of the day, extended to Battersea in the future and run to only one of the Northern termini, is it time that the West End and Bank branches of the Northern line were separated on the map and one of them given a new name?

I would suggest that we have a 'West End' line (Edgware - Kennington via Charing Cross) as well as the Northern and worked as separate lines although stock would be common to both. Memory suggests that there is a cross-platform interchange available both at Kennington and Camden Town.

I don't know how the Northern works at present as far as services to the Northern termini go and I don't mind my idea being shot down in flames. :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,307
Location
Fenny Stratford
When I moved down south I thought the Northern Line might get me home, but it is a con. It only goes as far as Barnet and that isnt very far north at all. :lol:;)

People ARE confused by it, especially the concept of a southbound northern line train and the fact it has two branches so changing the name of part of the route might be sensible.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
When I moved down south I thought the Northern Line might get me home, but it is a con. It only goes as far as Barnet and that isnt very far north at all. :lol:;)

People ARE confused by it, especially the concept of a southbound northern line train and the fact it has two branches so changing the name of part of the route might be sensible.

Are they? Ive never noticed this. You could also say the second part of that sentence for every other line too.

Think there is a thread about the separation of the Northern line in the Underground forum.

Thing is if they change the name it will take years for Londoners to catch on and use whatever new name may be given. Most of us understand the 'Via Bank' or 'Via Charing X' routes by their very names.
 

stut

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
1,900
Thing is if they change the name it will take years for Londoners to catch on and use whatever new name may be given. Most of us understand the 'Via Bank' or 'Via Charing X' routes by their very names.

Too right. Just look at how many people still seem to live in counties that ceased to exist in 1974, and fail to accept that 020 is the STD code for London...
 

Buttsy

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
1,365
Location
Hanborough
Are they? Ive never noticed this. You could also say the second part of that sentence for every other line too.

Think there is a thread about the separation of the Northern line in the Underground forum.

Thing is if they change the name it will take years for Londoners to catch on and use whatever new name may be given. Most of us understand the 'Via Bank' or 'Via Charing X' routes by their very names.

Londoner's seemed to have little problem with 'Hammersmith & City' or 'London Overground' rather than Metropolitan or East London Line. :D
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Ahh but the joys of the Overground is that its too much like the Overland ;)

But remember the H&C has been called that for a long time AFAIK
 

Buttsy

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
1,365
Location
Hanborough
But remember the H&C has been called that for a long time AFAIK

It depends on your definition of long. :)
It only changed names in the 80s (when the line turned pink) as I remember it being just Metropolitan as a kid. Also, the London Game version I play from the 70s shows it as Metropolitan so you don't have to take a 'change' card to go from Finchley Road to Paddington. ;)
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Is it really worth the expense to change it over? It would entail new posters, new pocket maps, new branding on the rolling stock and an advertising campaign to get the message across. Doesn't seem worth it in my experience.
 

Buttsy

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
1,365
Location
Hanborough
Is it really worth the expense to change it over? It would entail new posters, new pocket maps, new branding on the rolling stock and an advertising campaign to get the message across. Doesn't seem worth it in my experience.

A bit like the various different ones issued for the extensions to the Overground network?

If you show every train as West End (Northern) then this does the advertising for a few years before you do such a changeover, such as when the Battersea extension or Crossrail are completed (if the latter is due to appear on the maps).

I take your point though. :)
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,194
Location
London
Londoner's seemed to have little problem with 'Hammersmith & City' or 'London Overground' rather than Metropolitan or East London Line. :D

..and Jubilee instead of the Stanmore branch of the Bakerloo.
Incidentally isn't it a milestone on the Northern line next Monday regarding the end of manually driven trains ?
 

W-on-Sea

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
1,338
Well, the H&C has only been pink, and a formally separate line since...1990, I think. Before that, yes, it was part of the Metropolitan Line (and I still sometimes refer to it as such...) - but it was none the less referred to as the "Hammersmith & City branch" on maps on the trains (as opposed to the "East London Section" of the Met line that became the East London line, then part of the Overground).

The main confusion in my experience with the Northern line is that it is not unknown for trains to leave Camden Town (mostly southbound) to the opposite branch from that which they were initially announced to go down. Sure, you can change at Euston (which is a hassle and a bit of a walk), but it is annoying. Probably separating out the branches would make sense, and not cause major inconvenience - - -well, so long as the interchange at Camden Town were upgraded (which would require major work, and a substantial reorganization and expansion of the station.....none of which will come easily or cheaply)
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
Not sure if this is the right section for this.

As the Charing Cross branch is to be cut short at Kennington the majority of the day, extended to Battersea in the future and run to only one of the Northern termini, is it time that the West End and Bank branches of the Northern line were separated on the map and one of them given a new name?

I would suggest that we have a 'West End' line (Edgware - Kennington via Charing Cross) as well as the Northern and worked as separate lines although stock would be common to both. Memory suggests that there is a cross-platform interchange available both at Kennington and Camden Town.

I don't know how the Northern works at present as far as services to the Northern termini go and I don't mind my idea being shot down in flames. :)

The split is on the tables as a northern line upgrade 2 supposedly in the early 2030s.

But for the split to work, Camden Town would need complete rebuilding to cope with the extra people using it to change.

However, depots and sidings would be split with each line having its own depot and sets of sidings.

City Line - Morden to High Barnet / Mill Hill Easthas depot at Morden and sidings at Highgate

Northern Line - Edgward to Kennington (or Battersea)has depot at Golders Green and sidings at Edgware
 

moogal

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2012
Messages
195
Location
Milton Keynes
They've fixed it these days, but the old version of the TfL journey planner, on asking for a journey from Euston to wherever, would ask whether you meant the Euston (Bank branch) or Euston (Charing Cross branch) station. As an (at the time) out-of-towner without a tube map or a good grasp of the layout of the lines, that was very confusing, particularly since for all intents and purposes they're the same station!
 

341o2

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
1,907
When I moved down south I thought the Northern Line might get me home, but it is a con. It only goes as far as Barnet and that isnt very far north at all

originally the Northern line was planned to run to Bushey heath near watford - Mill Hill east branch to join up with the Edgware branch and continue north. the works at Aldenham should have been for the line, but after completing part of the work, the extention was abandoned. Another proposed branch was to Muswell hill & Alexandra Palace

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_line Northern Heights paragraph
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,777
Location
West Country
URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_line"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_line[/URL] Northern Heights paragraph
I think that if the whole of the Northern Heights project had been completed, then that area of the tube map would look quite confusing, with black lines going in all directions.
 

341o2

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
1,907
what should have been made clear that the line from Moorgate - Finsbury Park (now used by GNER electrics) and then to Alexandra Palace would have been isolated from the rest of the system - rather like the East London line
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,835
Location
Epsom
However, depots and sidings would be split with each line having its own depot and sets of sidings.

City Line - Morden to High Barnet / Mill Hill Easthas depot at Morden and sidings at Highgate

Northern Line - Edgward to Kennington (or Battersea)has depot at Golders Green and sidings at Edgware

I think they might want to re-think the first name as there is already a Hammersmith & City Line and a Waterloo & City Line; having a City Line as well - especially one which would have interchanges with both the others ( at King's Cross and at Bank ) sounds like a recipe for tourist confusion to me!
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
I think they might want to re-think the first name as there is already a Hammersmith & City Line and a Waterloo & City Line; having a City Line as well - especially one which would have interchanges with both the others ( at King's Cross and at Bank ) sounds like a recipe for tourist confusion to me!

What else could we call it?
We couldn't call it the Yerkes Line because he wasn't involved in that part of the network.
City line works because it'd follow the route of the City and South London Railway
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,835
Location
Epsom
If they keep the Northern Line name for the City branch, then the Charing Cross branch could get a name related to the west end theatres area it serves?
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,983
Is it really worth the expense to change it over? It would entail new posters, new pocket maps, new branding on the rolling stock and an advertising campaign to get the message across. Doesn't seem worth it in my experience.

That is pittance compared with the benefits. The main problem is capacity. The flat junctions at Camden chew it up. Eradicate this and you can up the frequency. I don't have anything to hand, I seem to recall 32tph being possible up from the current 24/26tph?
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,404
Location
0035
That is pittance compared with the benefits. The main problem is capacity. The flat junctions at Camden chew it up. Eradicate this and you can up the frequency. I don't have anything to hand, I seem to recall 32tph being possible up from the current 24/26tph?

What do you mean by "flat junctions?" The junction at Camden Town is conflict-free.

http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Camden Town-lct5-10.gif
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b300/rbruce1314/ctj002.jpg (note Charing + and Moorgate labels are the wrong way round)
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,983
Aha. Got it. Currently 20tph, 24tph after current work underway completed, 32tph if lines separated.

The work at Camden would include re-aligning junction profiles to increase line speeds for the new service patterns. Currently, with only 5am - 9am being the only time the new proposed system is in operation, you can see the increase in tph possible. By mixing the traffic through the junctions here, you chew up time and capacity. Streamline the system and it makes it a lot better. There may not be 'direct conflict' but there is still time wasted through trying to thread multiple branches together and send them off again in different directions.
 

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
2,592
Location
North West
If they do split the Northern Line into Edgware - Charing Cross - Battersea and High Barnet / Mill Hill East - Bank - Morden, they could use the name Battersea Line to give the extension a high profile from the start. This would inevitably mean finding a new colour for the Underground map!
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,777
Location
West Country
As for colours, we've had many debates on which colour will feature next, but I suspect an Olive green (slightly darker than this) could be a possible choice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top