Northern Pacer Withdrawals - Info?

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by andyallen4014, 11 Jul 2018 at 14:57.

  1. andyallen4014

    andyallen4014 Member

    Messages:
    97
    Joined:
    11 Jul 2017
    I gather inroads will be made into the Pacer fleet from September(?) - i'm sure I read somewhere that 144's will be first. Does anyone have any further or up to date information (or lead me to an existing thread if there is one). Thanks
     
  2. Registered users do not see these banners - join or log in today!

    Rail Forums

     
  3. jcollins

    jcollins Veteran Member

    Messages:
    28,736
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    From the franchise agreement

    However, all release dates come with the footnote of

    So unless all 8 of the 769s enter service I don't think any Pacers will be released until 195s start to enter service and even if the 769s enter service my guess is 3 x Pacers which should have been released will remain until the WMT 150s arrive. That also ignores any delays to Northern's refurbishment schedule.
     
  4. Cardiff123

    Cardiff123 Member

    Messages:
    44
    Joined:
    10 Mar 2013
    Keolis Amey & TfW should put their names down to get hold of these Pacers as soon as Northern release them. Wales is desperate for any DMUs it can get now that Sprinters have started to go away for 2020 mods and no trains are in traffic to replace them.
     
  5. jcollins

    jcollins Veteran Member

    Messages:
    28,736
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Northern are in the same situation currently, additional services which should have happened last year still haven't been introduced due to DMU shortages, while some existing services are so full they are leaving passengers waiting on the platform. I think it's a good think TfW didn't plan to take on released Northern Pacers as an interim measure as they almost certainly won't be released as scheduled. I also imagine the worst ones will be released first - Cardiff passengers will be shocked at the state of those given how heavily the ATW Pacers have been refurbished.
     
  6. Jonfun

    Jonfun Established Member

    Messages:
    1,056
    Joined:
    16 Mar 2007
    Location:
    North West
    I can't help but think it's daft that some of Northern's trains are running around filled to bursting and yet we're seriously looking at withdrawing rolling stock which, whilst undeniably tired, is perfectly serviceable.
     
  7. 158756

    158756 Member

    Messages:
    491
    Joined:
    12 Aug 2014
    Aside from the politics - the press and MPs would prefer shorter trains to Pacers, any additional trains would require more subsidy, at a time when passenger numbers and revenue are flat or falling and the business case for Northern's new build trains was dubious to begin with.
     
  8. DJH1971

    DJH1971 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,070
    Joined:
    10 Jun 2012
    Location:
    St Helens, Merseyside
    The sooner the better
     
  9. ChiefPlanner

    ChiefPlanner Established Member

    Messages:
    4,175
    Joined:
    6 Sep 2011
    Location:
    Herts
    Was there not a "concept" refurbishment of one of the fleet ? , in which case one assumes that would (in a rational world) , be one of the last to go ...
     
  10. ainsworth74

    ainsworth74 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    18,235
    Joined:
    16 Nov 2009
    Location:
    Redcar
    There was! A 2-car 144 was refurbished with all sorts of fancy whizzbangs back when their ROSCO assumed that there might be life left in the Pacer fleet post-PRM TIS deadline. On the published schedule (which has almost certainly slid to the right) the last 144 is due to leave January 2019 well before the last 142...
     
  11. ChiefPlanner

    ChiefPlanner Established Member

    Messages:
    4,175
    Joined:
    6 Sep 2011
    Location:
    Herts
    Thank you - a case of a ROSCO doing something speculatively , to no end commercial gain ......
     
  12. jcollins

    jcollins Veteran Member

    Messages:
    28,736
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Porterbrook produced it to show what could be done. However, the unit (which they refer to as the ePacer) doesn't fully meet the PRM spec but is close enough to only need minor exemptions (similar to the ones the 150s have been given) to remain in service beyond 2019. The biggest constraint is that 144 doesn't have that many more seats than a 153 currently has, so there's only a limited number of routes where one in single formation can be used and it's not really cost-effective to create 'ePacers' if they are only going to be used attached to Sprinters. There was also a rumour they were looking at converting 143s in to centre cars for 144s (or vice versa) to create 4 car sets but nothing ever came of that.
     
  13. 47802

    47802 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,376
    Joined:
    8 Oct 2013
    I suppose it depends how pressed they are for units to run the current timetable, I wouldn't be surprised to see a few withdrawn once the 6x170 which are due from Scotrail this month are up and running on Northern.
     
  14. jcollins

    jcollins Veteran Member

    Messages:
    28,736
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    That's probably down to 144s being less versatile than 142s due to fewer crews signing them and possibly them not being cleared for some routes where 142s are cleared.
     
  15. jcollins

    jcollins Veteran Member

    Messages:
    28,736
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    It's 16 x 170s Northern should get in total and they were due to all be here by July 2018.

    In total it's 70 carriages (35 x 2 car Pacers) which were down for withdrawal by the December timetable change. If we look at what Northern are currently missing:
    8 x 769s (32 carriages)
    3 x 2 car 150s (6 carriages)
    That should mean until those missing trains (plus the 170s) arrive Northern can't release more than 18 x 2 car Pacers. Then it needs to be remembered Northern don't just have to receive the replacement units they have to introduce them in 'unrestricted use' for passenger services. So the fact that Northern received the GWR 150s late and are behind with refurbishments casts doubt over whether they'll even be able to release 18 x 2 car Pacers by the December timetable change.
     
  16. superkev

    superkev Member

    Messages:
    655
    Joined:
    1 Mar 2015
    Location:
    west yorkshire
    What about all the new 195''s
    K
     
  17. jcollins

    jcollins Veteran Member

    Messages:
    28,736
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    The new 195s, 331s, the GWR 12 x class 150 carriages (which probably won't come) plus the other Sprinters from Scotrail will be what are supposed to release the January 2019 and beyond batches.
     
  18. Eccles1983

    Eccles1983 On Moderation

    Messages:
    202
    Joined:
    4 Sep 2016
    I hope we get another 5 years out of the class 142.

    The backbone of the british railways, and a stubborn workhorse that never knows when to give up.

    It's the ultimate underdog that continually and consistantly over performs.
     
  19. KevinTurvey

    KevinTurvey Member

    Messages:
    59
    Joined:
    9 Oct 2016
    I travelled on two separate 142's today, one an ex First one and the other an ex Merseyrail.
    I was gobsmacked that both had auto-announcing PA systems installed.
    Does spending money on this sort of thing (albeit small) imply they will be around for a little longer than originally thought?
     
  20. D2007wsm

    D2007wsm Member

    Messages:
    675
    Joined:
    26 Jul 2015
    Location:
    Weston super Mare
    I don't know what the Northern Pacers are like, I haven't been on a train up that way for many years, so couldn't comment on their condition.

    However, with a decent refurbishment and running on decent track they could be fine. The GWR 143s are not bad as they have had 2 extensive refurbishments, first by Wessex Trains which introduced 2x2 high back Chapman seats and then a, refurbishment by FGW changing the colour scheme. I would much rather have one of those than the horrible 150/1s.

    If it wasn't for the ride quality, not having bogies and there limited capacity, if all of Northern's 142s had been refurbished to the same standard as GWR's 143s, would the travelling public detest them so much? From what I can make out, it is the TLC or lack of Northern's Pacers have had by previous operators which has earned their bad name. You don't see half as much negative press about GWRs 143s or even ATWs 142s and 143s in comparison.

    They may have their faults, but they have kept going and on a suitable route, running in multiple and with some TLC they are useful and better than no train. I remember these growing up on the stopping services at my local station, which has now predominately graduated to Turbos, 158s and soon Mini HSTs.
     
  21. 47802

    47802 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,376
    Joined:
    8 Oct 2013
    GWR 143's are luxurious compared to a Northern 142, and part of the problem was the disgraceful state of the interior and cleaning in general of all Northern Trains not just the Pacers in the previous franchise, not that the current franchise is doing a whole lot better in many of these respects, but it doesn't alter the fact that pacers are overdue for the bin and definitely need to go by the end of 2019.
     
  22. _toommm_

    _toommm_ Member

    Messages:
    474
    Joined:
    8 Jul 2017
    Location:
    South Yorkshire
    No 142s have auto PA to my knowledge...
     
  23. 158752

    158752 New Member

    Messages:
    4
    Joined:
    5 Jan 2018
    All the former Mersey Rail liveried 142's had a LAWO P.I.S installed with auto announce function. As far as I recall union opposition saw the use of the announcement function never used despite being functional until at least 2017, at which point standard Northern route destination codes were rolled out across the entire P.I.S installed diesel and electric fleets.
    The only way a 142 would be auto announcing nowadays were if it was coupled to a modified class 150/156 with the new TrainFX and it was set up from the control unit on those. This however isn't supposed to be done as there is an issue with the head units on non TrainFX fitted trains which don't allow correct interface between the two types.
     
  24. Cardiff123

    Cardiff123 Member

    Messages:
    44
    Joined:
    10 Mar 2013
    5 years? o_O 142s need to be binned in 5 weeks, let alone 5 years.

    ATW have recently given their Pacers a thorough interior refresh, even installing Wifi, but it doesn't change the fact a Pacer is still a Pacer.
    They need to go and go ASAP.
     
  25. Foggycorner

    Foggycorner Member

    Messages:
    76
    Joined:
    16 Nov 2016
    Location:
    bolton
    There's nothing wrong with northern 142's the lively ride keeps one from falling asleep and missing one's station
     
  26. alexl92

    alexl92 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,485
    Joined:
    12 Oct 2014
    Why don’t as many crews sign them, and whats the route clearance difference? I thought they were pretty similar in all respects? All utterly awful, mind
     
  27. alangla

    alangla Member

    Messages:
    41
    Joined:
    11 Apr 2018
    Location:
    Glasgow
    When the class 320s were being fitted with internal PIS & auto announce, if you were on a double set with a refurbished unit leading an unrefurbed one, the audio of the auto announcement could be heard in the unfitted unit, presumably being relayed via the PA system connection in the coupler - is this possibly what's happened here?
     
  28. PomWombat

    PomWombat Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    1 Jul 2018
    I was in a 3-car pacer this evening, but wish I noted the number. The seat backs were the white bulbous plastic bucket design which I find most restrictive on my knees - the mouldings make it impossible to put knees between seats. If I have to sit in an airline-style seat, then I have to sit in the middle of two seats, with my legs at more than a 90 degrees to fit them in.

    I know Northern need to fit more people in, but we're not all midgets!
     
  29. PomWombat

    PomWombat Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    1 Jul 2018
    LOL. They need to hand out ear defenders for pacers going through the Bramhope tunnel (why is it so noisy in the middle of the tunnel?) and for the bend approaching the Crimple viaduct. I pity the people living in the house next to that curve...
     
  30. chrissawer

    chrissawer Member

    Messages:
    71
    Joined:
    6 Nov 2013
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    I'm sure I've heard automated announcements on Northern 142s a couple of times recently, they were coupled up to other units so I assumed that what you've described was happening and the announcements were coming from the other unit.
     
  31. KevinTurvey

    KevinTurvey Member

    Messages:
    59
    Joined:
    9 Oct 2016
    Thanks - this now makes more sense, yes they were coupled up to a 150 and 156 each time.
     

Share This Page