Chester025
Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 1,047
Presumably when the 67s and DVTs were being procured, 4 x LHCS diagrams were very much on the cards.
And what were they going to be?
Presumably when the 67s and DVTs were being procured, 4 x LHCS diagrams were very much on the cards.
Given that there will be a gap between Gerald arriving at 0958 and departing at 1818, there's plenty of room for another movement....
But this argument's been done to death...why pay the high track access for a handful of passengers when a DMU will be fine?
Two Geralds, plus the other two which may or may not commence in September and/or December.
But this argument's been done to death...why pay the high track access for a handful of passengers when a DMU will be fine?
Nope, that doesn't make the slightest bit of sense whatsoever. How can 3 locos and 3 DVTs make 4 diagrams?Presumably when the 67s and DVTs were being procured, 4 x LHCS diagrams were very much on the cards.
That will now just be 2 x LHCS diagrams, which makes sense.
If there is only one diagram (Holyhead - Cardiff via Wrexham) as most of you seem to expect, then I would think two locos is what ATW need for their operations.As I've posted here: http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?p=1145804#post1145804 RI have reported that 67001 will be in use with Chiltern from December. Perhaps Arriva have decided that 2 locos is enough for their operations?
That depends what you use the LHCS on. Some franchise workings from Llandudno and Swansea to Manchester carry far more than a handful of passengers and even a 3-car 175 DMU is not always fine. Using LHCS would be benifitial for relieving overcrowding I'm sure. On the other hand, from what I've read on here the current WAG2 175 southbound slot carries just a handful of passengers and if so paying for LHCS on that service would probably be a waste.But this argument's been done to death...why pay the high track access for a handful of passengers when a DMU will be fine?
ATW are never going to use LHCS on anything but the WG as long as a Unit is available, whatever case one might pit forward, only if WG pay for it. They would not want to pay higher Track access charges.
Still no Hereford then?
(though quite why they say that then include Cwmbran and Abergavenny on the evening service I don't know, however to me it makes sense in principal).
I think the reason the WG doesn't stop at Hereford is because it is an English station. It stops at Amwythig (Shrewsbury) though because it is the connectional point for the Cambrian and is used as convenient central location for bodies from Wales to meet.I think the reason that has always been banded about for Hereford's omission from the various expresses is that they exist to act as a North-South fast service, calling at Hereford would only encourage local traffic, plus add time onto the journey (though quite why they say that then include Cwmbran and Abergavenny on the evening service I don't know, however to me it makes sense in principal).
For the record, I did the existing WAG 2 via Wrexham southbound one Wednesday morning a few weeks ago. I joined at Chester (it was a 2-car 175), and it was 40-50% full as far as Gobowen (about 10-20 joined / alighted at Wrexham General), where a good 20-30 were waiting, most of whom left at Shrewsbury. We carried on after that with maybe my carriage 20% full, which didn't improve at Newport. I note that at Ruabon and Chirk, the northbound platforms were significantly busier than the southbound ones.
Why would that affect a train service calling there in 2012?
Sorry, at times it is hard to tell sarcasm from humour from seriousness on forums!
I think the reason the WG doesn't stop at Hereford is because it is an English station. It stops at Amwythig (Shrewsbury) though because it is the connectional point for the Cambrian and is used as convenient central location for bodies from Wales to meet.
I think the reason that has always been banded about for Hereford's omission from the various expresses is that they exist to act as a North-South fast service, calling at Hereford would only encourage local traffic, plus add time onto the journey (though quite why they say that then include Cwmbran and Abergavenny on the evening service I don't know, however to me it makes sense in principal).
For the record, I did the existing WAG 2 via Wrexham southbound one Wednesday morning a few weeks ago. I joined at Chester (it was a 2-car 175), and it was 40-50% full as far as Gobowen (about 10-20 joined / alighted at Wrexham General), where a good 20-30 were waiting, most of whom left at Shrewsbury. We carried on after that with maybe my carriage 20% full, which didn't improve at Newport. I note that at Ruabon and Chirk, the northbound platforms were significantly busier than the southbound ones.
Also Shropshire used to once be Wales.
Just perusing the timetables for September to December available online at arrivatrainswales.co.uk/timetables and they give a slightly different picture to what Bob's posted:
0533 off HHD: Calling at Bangor, Llandudno J, Rhyl, Fflint, Chester, Crewe, Shrewsbury, Hereford, Newport, Cardiff.
1821 off CDF: Calling at Newport, Abergavenny, Hereford, Shrewsbury, Gobowen, Wrexham G, Chester, Flint, Rhyl, Colwyn Bay, Llandudno J, Bangor and Holyhead.
Table number one & four shows the WAG via Wrexham on the up , as expected. Not Crewe, I will agree table four is confusing.
Bob
I'm looking at the "Summary of North Wales - South Wales Services" lists in Timetable 2 (purple). Just looked at 1 (red) and it shows Wrexham on the morning journey as you say.
Another thing which indicates a mistake on the timetable's part is the lack of 1st Class and Dining symbols on the 1821 service in Timetable 2 and Timetable 4 (orange)
I can confirm that the restaurant service will still be running on the 1821. I'm currently on Wag1, the food has been fantastic as always. I've used it around 10+ times, always been impressed.