I've merged the threads as they are all discussing the same principle.I wonder if you were aware that the last time we discussed this..
My view is unchanged: there's nothing to say it isn't valid, I believe it is permitted.
I've merged the threads as they are all discussing the same principle.I wonder if you were aware that the last time we discussed this..
In the scenario described, the passenger would travel on ticket 1 to B, then change to ticket 2. Or alternatively travel the full distance of ticket 1 and commence using ticket 2 at C. (It makes no difference whether this is all on the same train or the passenger changes at B or C). No BoJ has occured and all travel is on the booked trains.
If people start using this logic en masse to, for example, travel to Southampton on a Waterloo-Brockenhurst Advance and Southampton Airport-Southampton CDS, then we can expect to see the terms 'clarified'.
I wonder if you were aware that the last time we discussed this, the thread even had exactly the same title: overlapping advance tickets
and the time before that, it had . . . . . . wait for it . . . . . . . exactly the same title : Overlapping advance tickets
If people start using this logic en masse to, for example, travel to Southampton on a Waterloo-Brockenhurst Advance and Southampton Airport-Southampton CDS, then we can expect to see the terms 'clarified'.
But unlocking can be arranged where appropriateBut don't forget that old threads get locked after a time....
No 'clarification' is needed, surely? The published conditions for Advance tickets explicitly state that they are not valid for Break of Journey, stopping short or starting long.
Use of station facilities, of course, is not a BoJ...
Ah, but that's very different. I think we are all comfortable that that isn't permitted