• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Potential future uses for class 68 & Mk5 sets?

68 010

New Member
Joined
24 Jan 2024
Messages
4
Location
Shropshire
Looking more likely to be going to Chiltern.
It would be nice to see the Mark 5A coaching stock join the Chiltern fleet.

However, if anything this change will come into effect during 2026 (towards the end). Also, to ask did every of the Mark 5A sets have cracks discovered or was it several of them?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

So have they found a solution to the noise issues?
The Class 68s that Chiltern Railways currently operate are noisy and powerful! It wouldn't make a difference to be quite honest.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mugby

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2012
Messages
2,031
Location
Derby
The Class 68s that Chiltern Railways currently operate are noisy and powerful! It wouldn't make a difference to be quite honest.
They certainly are noisy, it always surprises me how you can hear them very loudly inside the Bullring Centre at the Selfridges end!
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Railtours & Preservation
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
4,150
You can hear any 68's from a mile away
Hardly an effort, used to be able to hear 50s from home, 2.5 miles from the line!!!!
I'll leave it there otherwise drag this off topic!
 

68 010

New Member
Joined
24 Jan 2024
Messages
4
Location
Shropshire
They certainly are noisy, it always surprises me how you can hear them very loudly inside the Bullring Centre at the Selfridges end!
They sure are! When I sit on a bench at Birmingham Moor Street, I'm next to a 68 and, you can definitely feel the bench vibrate slightly from the soundwaves.

It would be interesting to know what make them such loud Diesel Locomotives.
 

68 010

New Member
Joined
24 Jan 2024
Messages
4
Location
Shropshire
Especially considering how new they are compared to other quieter locos
Absolutely 100%! I did receive an email from Chiltern Railways, of which said "At this time our teams are still working with the Department for Transport with regards to acquiring additional rolling stock and currently nothing has yet been confirmed."

So basically there are no further updates regarding the Mark 5A coaching stock.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2023
Messages
268
Location
High Wycombe
Absolutely 100%! I did receive an email from Chiltern Railways, of which said "At this time our teams are still working with the Department for Transport with regards to acquiring additional rolling stock and currently nothing has yet been confirmed."

So basically there are no further updates regarding the Mark 5A coaching stock.
Yeah it’s been like a month since the last update. Obviously it’s more than just a scrawl at the bottom of a page but surely it can’t be taking this long?”. TPE stopped using them at least a year and a half ago now.
 

Peter749

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2016
Messages
94
Location
Salford
Slightly OT - I wonder if the 68s from Chiltern 68010 - 68015 could be replacements for the Class 67s on TfW.
Being maintained at Crewe instead of Toton would help in loco changes.

Peter
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,547
Slightly OT - I wonder if the 68s from Chiltern 68010 - 68015 could be replacements for the Class 67s on TfW.
Being maintained at Crewe instead of Toton would help in loco changes.

Peter
Most of the 67 work is carried out locally at Crewe ETD - it's rare that they need to go to Toton. A lot of time and money has gone into the 67s, and there are no signs of any plans to replace them in the short term.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2023
Messages
268
Location
High Wycombe
Slightly OT - I wonder if the 68s from Chiltern 68010 - 68015 could be replacements for the Class 67s on TfW.
Being maintained at Crewe instead of Toton would help in loco changes.

Peter
Probably would be good for ordering some brand new Mk5s (minimum 30 ish) to go behind them to further increase capacity, and possibly extend some stuff to Kidderminster or Worcester. Also would be especially useful to lessen the impact on Aylesburys when needing to provide extra Birmingham/Oxford services or something.

Something something local bias though probably!
 
Joined
22 Jan 2024
Messages
139
Location
Yorkshire
Most of the 67 work is carried out locally at Crewe ETD - it's rare that they need to go to Toton. A lot of time and money has gone into the 67s, and there are no signs of any plans to replace them in the short term.

Plus TfW have bought a couple of 67s outright, six 68s wouldn't be enough to replace the TfW 67 fleet, and DRS (who sub-lease the current locos to Chiltern) clearly have no interest in the passenger market any more. And 68s will doubtless be more expensive to lease than 67s as they are newer.
 
Joined
22 Jan 2024
Messages
139
Location
Yorkshire
Probably would be good for ordering some brand new Mk5s (minimum 30 ish) to go behind them to further increase capacity, and possibly extend some stuff to Kidderminster or Worcester. Also would be especially useful to lessen the impact on Aylesburys when needing to provide extra Birmingham/Oxford services or something.

Something something local bias though probably!

Clearly not going to happen - if Chiltern do have the current Mk5a fleet it will be because there is nothing else available in the short term. Which is much the same as the reason they currently have the Mk3a sets! After the fiasco with Transpennine giving up on the mk5a sets the ROSCO isn't going to be spending more money on the fleet now. And DRS may well want the current locos back as soon as the Mk3 sets are withdrawn.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,442
Location
Bristol
I can't see the 68s going to the Cardiff-Manchesters anytime soon, if TFW replace the 67s, surely they'd be looking for bi-modes to run under the wires from Cardiff to Newport and Crewe to Manchester? That's probably a separate speculative thread though.
 
Joined
22 Jan 2024
Messages
139
Location
Yorkshire
I can't see the 68s going to the Cardiff-Manchesters anytime soon, if TFW replace the 67s, surely they'd be looking for bi-modes to run under the wires from Cardiff to Newport and Crewe to Manchester? That's probably a separate speculative thread though.

Nobody is likely to fund brand new locos to use with sets as old as the Mk4s, which can't really have a life expectancy of more than another decade in use. And it would need a bi-mode more powerful on diesel than 88/92, and with a higher top speed than the 99s (and an ETS supply).
 
Joined
9 Dec 2023
Messages
268
Location
High Wycombe
Clearly not going to happen - if Chiltern do have the current Mk5a fleet it will be because there is nothing else available in the short term. Which is much the same as the reason they currently have the Mk3a sets! After the fiasco with Transpennine giving up on the mk5a sets the ROSCO isn't going to be spending more money on the fleet now. And DRS may well want the current locos back as soon as the Mk3 sets are withdrawn.
Fairs. I guess Chiltern would want something bi mode to prepare for if the CML ever gets electrified one day.
 

Jacob Porrett

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2022
Messages
1,321
Location
Telford
Probably would be good for ordering some brand new Mk5s (minimum 30 ish) to go behind them to further increase capacity, and possibly extend some stuff to Kidderminster or Worcester. Also would be especially useful to lessen the impact on Aylesburys when needing to provide extra Birmingham/Oxford services or something.

Something something local bias though probably!
They stopped the 68s going to Kidderminster a few years back so that won't happen again soon.
 

Jacob Porrett

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2022
Messages
1,321
Location
Telford
Any particular reason? Was it just to reduce the empty mileage?
To provide better services i think. By the time the 68s got to Kidderminster they were empty anyway. Then they had to go back to Stourbridge to go into the Sidings. I rode one once from London to Kidderminster just to tick it off really.
 

Ridercross

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2020
Messages
117
Location
Midlands
To provide better services i think. By the time the 68s got to Kidderminster they were empty anyway. Then they had to go back to Stourbridge to go into the Sidings. I rode one once from London to Kidderminster just to tick it off really.
I regularly travelled on them both morning and evenings. Never travelled on an empty either to and from Kidderminster. Particularly in the AM peak when they provided much needed extra services between Birmingham and Kidderminster, as well as being useful for through service to Leamington / Banbury / London at all times.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2023
Messages
268
Location
High Wycombe
I regularly travelled on them both morning and evenings. Never travelled on an empty either to and from Kidderminster. Particularly in the AM peak when they provided much needed extra services between Birmingham and Kidderminster, as well as being useful for through service to Leamington / Banbury / London at all times.
Would be even more useful/busy if it went to Worcester surely?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Correct - a kneejerk Covid-related decision which supposedly reduced costs.
And revenue probably too…
 

sad1e

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2024
Messages
245
Location
London
DRS may well want the current locos back as soon as the Mk3 sets are withdrawn.
Is there a possibility that as the mk5a's come in. if the 68s are withdrawn alongside them 99's or 93's may be used instead. If I recall correctly both of them should be fitted properly for passenger workings. It should just be a matter of training.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,992
Is there a possibility that as the mk5a's come in. if the 68s are withdrawn alongside them 99's or 93's may be used instead. If I recall correctly both of them should be fitted properly for passenger workings. It should just be a matter of training.
The class 99 is only 75mph. Chiltern has no OHLE so there's no benefits over the 68s. It's expected that the Chiltern 68s will go back to DRS, and the mk5A fitted ex-TPE class 68s will head to Chiltern instead.
 

PLY2AYS

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2024
Messages
211
Location
London
Is there a possibility that as the mk5a's come in. if the 68s are withdrawn alongside them 99's or 93's may be used instead. If I recall correctly both of them should be fitted properly for passenger workings. It should just be a matter of training.
As I understand it, the 68s will be directly replaced with the new 68s as stipulated by the lease agreement. Additionally the new 68s have some additional features like SDO etc. which work with the mk5A sets, making the older ones incompatible.


The suggestion of 93s has been addressed in post #1343

And as @Energy alluded to above; the 99s aren’t fast enough. So until electrification occurs, 68s are the most suitable rolling stock procurement, which won’t require major retraining of the driving workforce.
 
Last edited:

Top