TT-ONR-NRN
Established Member
Which personally I think is a shame, as their fleet would look wholly better without IMO.GA chose to add the yellow did they not? Not “had to”.
Which personally I think is a shame, as their fleet would look wholly better without IMO.GA chose to add the yellow did they not? Not “had to”.
They’ll look odd next to each other at Euston.Just to be clear, I don't have any issues with the non-yellow front but I do find the decision to retain 390 yellow but introduce 805/7s with black is bad purely from a brand POV.
The decision to retain yellow fronts on the 390s isn't by choice, the lights are not compliant with the modern standards to allow them to lose it.Just to be clear, I don't have any issues with the non-yellow front but I do find the decision to retain 390 yellow but introduce 805/7s with black is bad purely from a brand POV.
But introducing the 80x with a black front is a choice.The decision to retain yellow fronts on the 390s isn't by choice, the lights are not compliant with the modern standards to allow them to lose it.
But introducing the 80x with a black front is a choice.
Although in fairness we don’t yet know that’s what they’re doing. Renders of 701s also showed a black front, and 720s showed a (much nicer looking) red front.
None of the 80x fleets have worn vinyl over the front panel although this is the case for 221101 which is black underneath.The video in post#199 shows an actual unit however, resplendent with non-yellow front which near as confirms what they're doing.
It's certainly possible that when the vinyls are applied, the black sections will turn yellow but I would amazed if they painted a section black to then put vinyls over the top - if they were going to get vinyled over they'd be in the same basecoat colour, or would have been painted
Could always add yellow vinyl in diagonal stripes. I'll get my coat.The video in post#199 shows an actual unit however, resplendent with non-yellow front which near as confirms what they're doing.
It's certainly possible that when the vinyls are applied, the black sections will turn yellow but I would amazed if they painted a section black to then put vinyls over the top - if they were going to get vinyled over they'd be in the same basecoat colour, or would have been painted
Just on this point, remember TPE is a mix though. All the new stock has black fronts, the 'legacy' 185s, despite their newer lights, still retain a yellow front end. I thought that the 185s were supposed to receding lighting upgrades but perhaps they've just chosen to retain it?Just to be clear, I don't have any issues with the non-yellow front but I do find the decision to retain 390 yellow but introduce 805/7s with black is bad purely from a brand POV.
That was never planned though, as you go on to prove.Just on this point, remember TPE is a mix though. All the new stock has black fronts, the 'legacy' 185s, despite their newer lights, still retain a yellow front end. I thought that the 185s were supposed to receding lighting upgrades but perhaps they've just chosen to retain it?
Black yes, but blue as per the 68s would work, as illustrated with a digitally edited photo myself a number of years agoClass 185s did have a lighting upgrade but perhaps the guys in charge of the livery thought 20 square feet of just black would look a bit odd?
I hadn’t thought of that, because do Grupo Antolin even make them anymore? Blue Sophias with oversized cream leather headrests like on LNER otherwiseAlso, is there any word on what first class will look like on these units? If it’s the same as on the refurbed 390s (reupholstered Grupo Antolin seats) that’ll effectively be proof that the fire regulations excuse for uncomfortable seats on most new build trains was a load of rubbish.
Just to be clear, I don't have any issues with the non-yellow front but I do find the decision to retain 390 yellow but introduce 805/7s with black is bad purely from a brand POV.
They’ll look odd next to each other at Euston.
805001 now due to move from Merchant Park to Old Dalby on Saturday
5Q61 12th November,
DEP
09:27 Mechant Park
10:35 York
11:25 Doncaster
12:51 Spalding
PBO VQ (RR) 13:15 - 15:50
16:28~Uffington
Then down to Melton Mowbray but with over 60 minutes of pathing due roughly 18:00 at Melton Mowbray if the pathing doesn't affect it
They don’t, but if I recall correctly enough are left over from the coach G conversions on the 390s (both the 9 cars a while ago and the 11 cars being refurbished now) to equip the 805s/807s with them.I hadn’t thought of that, because do Grupo Antolin even make them anymore? Blue Sophias with oversized cream leather headrests like on LNER otherwise
Seen some Internal pictures, and looks similar to the refurb pendo, the seats did all have plastic covers over though.I hadn’t thought of that, because do Grupo Antolin even make them anymore? Blue Sophias with oversized cream leather headrests like on LNER otherwise
I would be surprised if they are the upholstered the same as the 390s fleet; the reason why TPE has full moquette seats in their 802s, while the same seats in the CAF built fleet is a mixture of moquette and leather, is because Hitachi counted it as a completely new seat design which would both cost more and have to go through (their own) fire testing. That, despite being the same seat used elsewhere - even ScotRails somewhat misleading 385 first class is a Sophia with moquette and leather!Also, is there any word on what first class will look like on these units? If it’s the same as on the refurbed 390s (reupholstered Grupo Antolin seats) that’ll effectively be proof that the fire regulations excuse for uncomfortable seats on most new build trains was a load of rubbish.
I would be surprised if they are the upholstered the same as the 390s fleet; the reason why TPE has full moquette seats in their 802s, while the same seats in the CAF built fleet is a mixture of moquette and leather, is because Hitachi counted it as a completely new seat design which would both cost more and have to go through (their own) fire testing. That, despite being the same seat used elsewhere - even ScotRails somewhat misleading 385 first class is a Sophia with moquette and leather!
ScotRails somewhat misleading 385 first class is a Sophia with moquette and leather!
Baring in mind the 805/807 is going through complete new train testing at Old Dalby (unlike TPE or Lumo) then it’s perfectly plausible that they have the same seats as in a pendo, and again from pics I’ve seen, they do look different type to the standard 80X seating.I would be surprised if they are the upholstered the same as the 390s fleet; the reason why TPE has full moquette seats in their 802s, while the same seats in the CAF built fleet is a mixture of moquette and leather, is because Hitachi counted it as a completely new seat design which would both cost more and have to go through (their own) fire testing. That, despite being the same seat used elsewhere - even ScotRails somewhat misleading 385 first class is a Sophia with moquette and leather!
Baring in mind the 805/807 is going through complete new train testing at Old Dalby (unlike TPE or Lumo) then it’s perfectly plausible that they have the same seats as in a pendo, and again from pics I’ve seen, they do look different type to the standard 80X seating.
Sadly very bright and bland compared to the 390, but I expected no different. Thanks for sharing the image.Baring in mind the 805/807 is going through complete new train testing at Old Dalby (unlike TPE or Lumo) then it’s perfectly plausible that they have the same seats as in a pendo, and again from pics I’ve seen, they do look different type to the standard 80X seating.
They are indeed the same seats as in standard on a refurbed Pendo, which themselves are a modified version of what Lumo use. Produced by Transcal.Baring in mind the 805/807 is going through complete new train testing at Old Dalby (unlike TPE or Lumo) then it’s perfectly plausible that they have the same seats as in a pendo, and again from pics I’ve seen, they do look different type to the standard 80X seating.
They should have submitted another new seat for certification for the first class seating. My guess though would be something like the first on a class 745. Coming close would be the IET seats in first which aren't too bad, even after a 4 hour trip to Edinburgh I didn't have any aches (I will try not to start a seating debate, those are endless) but they are decent for a post PRM fire regulation seat.First class will be the interesting one, as the only way to have the same seats as the Pendo there is to re-use seats removed from Pendos through the Coach G conversions, and if they’d done that it’d somewhat disprove the ‘old designs don’t meet fire regulations’ excuse that’s been given for other new trains having uncomfortable seats!
They should have submitted another new seat for certification for the first class seating. My guess though would be something like the first on a class 745. Coming close would be the IET seats in first which aren't too bad, even after a 4 hour trip to Edinburgh I didn't have any aches (I will try not to start a seating debate, those are endless) but they are decent for a post PRM fire regulation seat.
So we know there are technical differences between an 802 and an 805 - are there any technical differences between an 803 and an 807?
Correct - the class 805 and 807 are classed as completely new trains so will require gauge clearance work (and infrastructure modifications, if any is identified) and full PTI testing, even where 800/801/802 are already cleared. Hitachi released the gauging profiles to NR and their subcontractors earlier this month.Baring in mind the 805/807 is going through complete new train testing at Old Dalby
I know they’re classed as completely new trains but my question remains, are there actually any technical differences between an 803 and an 807?Correct - the class 805 and 807 are classed as completely new trains so will require gauge clearance work (and infrastructure modifications, if any is identified) and full PTI testing, even where 800/801/802 are already cleared. Hitachi released the gauging profiles to NR and their subcontractors earlier this month.
But they will be travelling faster than other non-tilt stock on the WCML, so presumably have a different clearance profile over 110mph.Correct - the class 805 and 807 are classed as completely new trains so will require gauge clearance work (and infrastructure modifications, if any is identified) and full PTI testing, even where 800/801/802 are already cleared. Hitachi released the gauging profiles to NR and their subcontractors earlier this month.