The debate about charging for 'National' museums is a long running one, and the pros and cons debated of course
Info here explores the recent history of it, but even then I suspect it is complex (I'd forgotten that not all of them ever started charging, though I recall the NRM did I feel sure)
see some headlines here:
www.centreforpublicimpact.org
eg
"visitor numbers at many of the free national museums grew spectacularly, while some of the charging museums suffered marked declines. The Victoria and Albert Museum (V&A) in London introduced a £5 admission charge in 1997 and saw its visitor numbers halved as a result."
and
"The national museums which dropped charges all saw substantial increases to their visitor numbers, an average of 70 percent. In the first year after free admission was introduced visitor figures to the V&A rose by 111 percent from 1.1 million to 2.3 million. In 2009, the Art Fund found that “since free admission was introduced in 2001, visits to previously charging museums have more than doubled, from 7.2 million eight years ago to 16 million last year". Eight out of the top ten UK visitor attractions in 2010 were free national museums. "
The most obvious issue for me about a charge is the distinctive for a short visit. I recall a year or so ago being in York at a work meeting that ended early and allowed me just over an hour in the NRM before it closed. This permitted a whizz round to see some favourite objects, time to buy some food in their cafe to take and eat on the train home, and bought a couple of books in the museum shop.
Would I have done that if I'd had to pay a £10 entry fee? No. I'd have just gone home after the meeting earlier.
And when such places start charging, it's never a couple of quid is it - always seems to go from £0 to £10 ish type of thing!
But indeed in other countries museum charges do seem to be more of the norm (with free days or certain time slots) - but then they often seem to charge for public toilets on the continent too....
The dumbing down is nothing new - the main NRM in York has been doing this for years.
Sadly seems to be a trend across many museums. I have only in recent years noticed how 'fashion driven' museums seems to be - in that they all seem to go with similar trends at the same time - eg now go with not too much information, or all adopting audio guides, or lots of things you can press or handles to turn round - with invariably the thing connected to said handle/button no longer working properly....or a more recent trend -- what seems like 'less is more' - ie no real need to have lots of objects to look at in the museum, instead better to have large acres of empty space with just a few things in them, all the better to see the expensive architectural results of a large National Lottery funded building I suppose.
Yet the NRMs packed storage area that you can explore is obviously much liked by visitors, or seems to me to be.
I was amused when some friends reported back on the visit to the new V&A outpost in Dundee. Their teenage children remarked that it was nice enough, but would be much better if it had a few more things inside it to see when you went
