moggie
Member
Not forgetting that his appeal was against sacking for gross misconduct as well. So presumably it's now accepted by NR that either his action didn't amount to Gross Misconduct - i.e those who found he had were mistaken in their judgement or NR on the balance of probability thought their chances of winning their case at a tribunal was odds on zero in the context of the previous legal precedent against them.
Either way common sense and pragmatism has prevailed and JL should be allowed to get on with his job (or have a happy retirement if that's his choice) and not be treated like a piece of something on the sole of a shoe but as a professional who clearly takes his role with the upmost seriousness instead of working while fatigued just waiting to make an error.
Either way common sense and pragmatism has prevailed and JL should be allowed to get on with his job (or have a happy retirement if that's his choice) and not be treated like a piece of something on the sole of a shoe but as a professional who clearly takes his role with the upmost seriousness instead of working while fatigued just waiting to make an error.