As a member of traincrew I actively want smoking back on platforms. All it does is encourage people to chance it in the loos which is a fire risk and even more unpleasant as desperate people need a fix after a number of hours on trains - many places it's so far to walk there's not even chance to go legally on connections on many journeys. Staff and passengers are united on that issue which is why you still get drivers and guards lighting up in cabs and with the electric cigarette bans incoming I for one I have no interest in enforcing them as there is no legal basis to do so except for the principal of private property.
I'm a non smoker by the way.
I agree completely, the current situation is OTT and encourages people to break the rules. It also creates situations where staff are more likely to face aggression when enforcing the rules.
I would like to see all platforms with open air sections have marked smoking areas, with a sufficient gap from enclosed canopies and clear marking then people who want to can smoke away from others with little or no risk of second hand smoke. It would minimise the illegal smoking in far worse places (train toilets, cabs, large groups huddled outside main entrances) and give staff a reasonable way of enforcing no smoking in enclosed areas.
Oh, and I am also a non-smoker who loathes the stuff. I just don't see the point in antagonising people when there is a reasonable compromise and lets face it a high % of smokers are the sort that are likely to cause aggro. As someone once said to me; Not all smokers are scumbags but all scumbags smoke. Probably not true but not that far off the mark.
Fishguard Harbour Station still allows smoking as it is owned by Stena Line, which might be very useful in the future, as there are plans afoot in the ROI to ban smoking completely. Cue gangs of Irishmen and women lined up on the Platform puffing their fags on their weekly trip from smoke free Ireland!
Total nonsense, there are no plans to ban smoking here. Besides the obvious reasons of it being completely unenforceable (a large land border that no longer has any active controls) it would also cost a fortune in lost excise duty.
I don't wish to passively inhale car exhaust fumes, but bizarrely it's legal for others to force me to do so.
Cars, trains, buses, trucks and industrial sources of pollution are as a result of their primary functions which provide a benefit to society as a whole (ok maybe urban car use is arguable) whereas the only function tobacco smoke serves is to poison the idiots who consume it and those unlucky enough to be near them.
Until the combustion of tobacco is able to provide a safe, comfortable and speedy method of transportation there is no justification in comparing it's health effects against that of motor vehicles.