Gloster
Established Member
One dreads to think what people might take selfies of themselves doing. (Not the most elegant of sentenceS: it sounds like a ‘translate into German’ question.)Or maybe Acton Relief Line?
One dreads to think what people might take selfies of themselves doing. (Not the most elegant of sentenceS: it sounds like a ‘translate into German’ question.)Or maybe Acton Relief Line?
Ha ha I honestly didn't even think that! Anything to get TfL to boost the service from once every half an hour...That would boost passenger numbers, with people going there just to take selfies under the signs... or even just buying singles from Ealing Broadway so they have an amusing ticket!
Mainly to differentiate of course from all the other Underground / Overground stations - there's already a south, north, west, east 'town' and 'central'! It does seem like a fudge but I guess the intention is that it clarifies which route it is.Acton Main Line - makes little sense to me once Crossrail is fully opened to me. Acton Horn Lane or just Horn Lane seems more appropriate.
Nah! 'Bishopstone' to 'Seaford Sunnyside' (*) would have more of a ring to it!Bishopstone to be Seaford Promenade, as the station is nowhere near Bishopstone as a town/village, but is near Seaford Promenade seafront area.
You obviously don't know Clydebank. Singer, although originally the name of a factory producing sewing machines, is now the locally accepted name for the area around the upper parts of Kilbowie Road. Clydebank North is more likely to be taken as Hardgate or Duntocher. Following your "logic" then with Crossrail, Paddington becomes London West and Liverpool Street to London EastI would rename Singer and Clydebank Clydebank North and Clydebank South respectively.
What’s even more peculiar about it, is that when built, it was called Woolhampton, and then changed its name some 150 years ago to Midgham.Midgham Station in Berkshire should really be named Woolhampton.
It sits in the village of Wollhampton, with Midgham being 2 miles away!
Apparently it got confused with Wolverhampton, until 1873. Since then it must have caused much local amusement. For a station with an hourly service it isn't very busy.What’s even more peculiar about it, is that when built, it was called Woolhampton, and then changed its name some 150 years ago to Midgham.
It was proposed years ago, how officially I do not know, but Oxenholme to something that reflects the fact the station's in pretty much a suburb of Kendal. Kendal Main or Kendal Junction perhaps?
Liverpool South Parkway back to Allerton.
Kendal Junction and Kendal Town would work for the two stations, though in reality it's reasonably well known so might just confuse people unnecessarily.
What about Garston? It was the merger of two stations, effectively (OK, Garston's platforms were moved a bit).
"Holborn Viaduct & Ludgate Circus"? "Old Bailey"?City Thameslink has always bugged me as a name. Next time they upgrade systems and/or signage it should revert to the original proposed name of St. Paul's. Might get confused with the Central Line station but that didn't stop Edgware Road or Hammersmith!
Failing that, how about "HolbornViaductUnderpass"?
The Bakerloo side was originally Traflalgar Square station wasn't it? I think it changed about the time the Jubilee arrived.Surely it’s no different to people who come to Euston finding that Euston Square is a couple of minutes walk away?
Neither of the Charing Cross LU platforms are particularly convenient for the mainline station, though the Bakerloo side is the worst. It was satisfactory when the whole complex was linked by the Jubilee Line, but (and this is only my personal view) since the Jubilee left the name sits awkwardly.
But they built the station so the entrance isn't on Shoreditch High Street at all. Shoreditch (for Brick lane) on the station boards?Caledonian Road and Barnsbury is on Caledonian Road but not in Barnsbury!
Shoreditch High Street was given it's name to distinguish it from the former East London line terminus station.
Catford station is not only served by Thameslink trains so your proposed renaming is misleading and could cause confusion.
And the Northern Line station, Strand.The Bakerloo side was originally Traflalgar Square station wasn't it? I think it changed about the time the Jubilee arrived.
Stratford City is used for the bus terminus on that side of Westfield but I've never heard anyone use that name otherwise.The problem with it is that Stratford is just as close to Westfield as Stratford Int'l is. No suggestion for Stratford Int'l including its current name ever feels right.
I would in an attempt to increase usage. As for the bus link, it's something I've long said should happen, and think it should even more with the housing developments.
1. Is it not? If it's not Barnsbury where is it officially, Pentonville, Holloway?
2. I assumed so, but it does seem a bit pointless. It's like renaming Rochester to Rochester Castle because it was resited.
3. I'm pretty sure Southeastern doesn't call at Catford at all. Happy to be proven wrong, mind.
I suggested it just to make it simpler, but I know the costs could never be justified.
It’s just a bit more complicated than that, (as mentioned by @Mikey C), but if you go right back like Geoff Marshall did it’s been subject to many changes:The Bakerloo side was originally Traflalgar Square station wasn't it? I think it changed about the time the Jubilee arrived.
Stratford, Ebbsfleet and Ashford on HS1 between St Pancras and the Channel Tunnel are no longer served by international services (I don't think Stratford ever was) so should have the misleading label "international" removed.
Yes, the Stratford complex is a nightmare to navigate. It took me aout 20 minutes a few years ago to get from the GE station to the HS station, I think I visited every single one of the six DLR platforms before finding the correct one.Though because Stratford is a different station the other side of a massive shopping centre to the other one (very much like Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbf and Regionalbf) you would need a different name. As the brand "Hispeed" is established with Southeastern, "Stratford Hispeed" would do.
the 2 councils paid for it (in part I think)Yes, i agree with the point about the ticket machine problem. I think tho it may have University (Bham) in brackets, but cant swear to that.
I think the station in the West Midlands that does need a re name and has been a bugbear of mine for years is Sandwell & Dudley.
No no no! Highspeed would be fine, if a bit clunky... but spelling it "Hispeed" would be atrocious. If that were to happen, I can't promise that I wouldn't come along in the dead of night and correct the spelling with a Sharpie!Though because Stratford is a different station the other side of a massive shopping centre to the other one (very much like Frankfurt Flughafen Fernbf and Regionalbf) you would need a different name. As the brand "Hispeed" is established with Southeastern, "Stratford Hispeed" would do.