• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SWR Class 458 to be retained

RacsoMoquette

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2023
Messages
252
Location
South Cambridgeshire
They still do leak.

I very much remember when they first entered. Loose and rattling panels (resolved by Wimbledon using copious amounts of mastic), ceiling panels hanging off, the TMS having to reset part-way through what felt like almost every journey, every unit having bad wheel flats, even in the summer, aircon giving up at the first sign of warm weather, water dripping out of the aircon units, barely audible PA. The list goes on. The overall quality was extraordinarily bad and fair play to SWT for putting so much effort into getting them to at least a half-reasonable standard.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


You mean former rather than latter? The 458s won't be needed for inner suburban routes.
Yes former I meant to say! Interesting, the units really did seem shambolically constructed! Wimbledon really must have made huge efforts to somewhat improve these vehicles.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Are members of the Juniper class popular with drivers? (at least when they work) as the pictures of the Class 334, Class 458 and Class 460 cabs, from the internet, look very nice cosmetically
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bigfoot

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2013
Messages
1,289
Yes former I meant to say! Interesting, the units really did seem shambolically constructed! Wimbledon really must have made huge efforts to somewhat improve these vehicles.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Are members of the Juniper class popular with drivers? (at least when they work) as the pictures of the Class 334, Class 458 and Class 460 cabs, from the internet, look very nice cosmetically
The 458 cabs are awful. Terrible visibility, switches all over the place and as ergonomic as a cardboard box.
 

RacsoMoquette

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2023
Messages
252
Location
South Cambridgeshire
DECEMBER 2024- Is it likely that the Class 458/4s will remain solely on Weybridge services for the foreseeable future? Does anyone think that they may see use alongside the Class 450s on the SWML sometime? Is it still anticipated that once the troubled Class 701s see full introduction, said class will be fully withdrawn and scraped? Can I ask, Why are the Class 458/4s not seeing SWML use alongside the Class 450s currently? As the Class 450s are being operated to their maximum capabilities quite intensively, and their reliability has become hindered due to this. Could the reluctance to operate the Class 458/4s on said routes be due to the unsatisfactory cab layout, and ASLEF refusals? (discussed on this thread previously) Though what other reasons could be thus?
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,364
DECEMBER 2024- Is it likely that the Class 458/4s will remain solely on Weybridge services for the foreseeable future? Does anyone think that they may see use alongside the Class 450s on the SWML sometime? Is it still anticipated that once the troubled Class 701s see full introduction, said class will be fully withdrawn and scraped? Can I ask, Why are the Class 458/4s not seeing SWML use alongside the Class 450s currently? As the Class 450s are being operated to their maximum capabilities quite intensively, and their reliability has become hindered due to this. Could the reluctance to operate the Class 458/4s on said routes be due to the unsatisfactory cab layout, and ASLEF refusals? (discussed on this thread previously) Though what other reasons could be thus?

Their conversation back to 100mph running has caused unexpected gauging issues on the mainline side but there are plans to run them on Windsor ER and Reading services apparently.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,882
DECEMBER 2024- Is it likely that the Class 458/4s will remain solely on Weybridge services for the foreseeable future? Does anyone think that they may see use alongside the Class 450s on the SWML sometime? Is it still anticipated that once the troubled Class 701s see full introduction, said class will be fully withdrawn and scraped? Can I ask, Why are the Class 458/4s not seeing SWML use alongside the Class 450s currently? As the Class 450s are being operated to their maximum capabilities quite intensively, and their reliability has become hindered due to this. Could the reluctance to operate the Class 458/4s on said routes be due to the unsatisfactory cab layout, and ASLEF refusals? (discussed on this thread previously) Though what other reasons could be thus?
As it is SWR have got too many 701s hence their investigating whether to add batteries to some of them to run to Exeter so I don't see any way the 458/5s will remain on an inner suburban route.

If they have no use on the Portsmouth line then it's most probably a one way visit to Newport. They can join the extensively rebuilt "Renatus" 321s.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,359
Do you have a source for this? It’s not something I’ve seen anywhere
There has been discussion of 450s getting batteries for Waterloo to Exeter with an official source, not 701s (nor 458s). I think if you read 'Goldfish62's post carefully they were talking about 450s, in that SWR have so many 701s, they are able to displace the 450s.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,882
There has been discussion of 450s getting batteries for Waterloo to Exeter with an official source, not 701s (nor 458s). I think if you read 'Goldfish62's post carefully they were talking about 450s, in that SWR have so many 701s, they are able to displace the 450s.
Well actually, the Engineering Director did say in that YouTube video that they are considering Desiros or 701s. He made that very clear.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,490
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Well actually, the Engineering Director did say in that YouTube video that they are considering Desiros or 701s. He made that very clear.
Would you expect that the still not fully commissioned, in warranty, finickity units, or the 20 year old, out of warranty well proven units with much simpler power distribution would be more likely to see conversion?

What "Directors" say and what will happen are usually two very different things.
 
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
1,029
If RTT allocations are correct, then it looks like 458406 has made its debut in passenger service today;

However, the 458/4 allocations on RTT were a bit iffy this morning because 458413 + 458411 were allocated 2C07 to Reading first thing, but I don't think 2C07 ran due to the engineering work over-run and the return diagram is a 4-car 450.
 

moley

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2011
Messages
361
Would you expect that the still not fully commissioned, in warranty, finickity units, or the 20 year old, out of warranty well proven units with much simpler power distribution would be more likely to see conversion?

What "Directors" say and what will happen are usually two very different things.
Likely that they are trying to create competition between two different fleets to keep conversion costs down. But SWR representatives have definitely said 450 and 701 being looked at.

450s more likely as you can run 8 carriages to Salisbury then drop 4 before continuing to Exeter. Whilst 701 formation of 5+5 might work well, presumably they 5 carriage sets are needed on the suburban hence ordering them in the first place. Can’t see them wanting to run 19 carriage trains all day to Exeter.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,490
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Likely that they are trying to create competition between two different fleets to keep conversion costs down. But SWR representatives have definitely said 450 and 701 being looked at.

450s more likely as you can run 8 carriages to Salisbury then drop 4 before continuing to Exeter. Whilst 701 formation of 5+5 might work well, presumably they 5 carriage sets are needed on the suburban hence ordering them in the first place. Can’t see them wanting to run 19 carriage trains all day to Exeter.
I suspect all it will be is to try and keep costs down. The weight distribution work already done on the design of the 701 with 4 of 5 cars of the 5 car motored makes is harder to convert as there's not an "empty" underframe kicking about. Whereas the 450s have an entire carriage with basically nothing under it, and facility to have (and may already have) an isolated DC bus from the "Pantograph" car through to both ends that could be hijacked for battery conversion since, it won't need to run on OLE.

(Similarly to how the 319 has two very empty DT cars that could fit diesel generators quite nicely, but they didn't have a spare isolated DC bus, only the positive pole running end to end with rail return on the PMS (MSO) car.)
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,882
Would you expect that the still not fully commissioned, in warranty, finickity units, or the 20 year old, out of warranty well proven units with much simpler power distribution would be more likely to see conversion?

What "Directors" say and what will happen are usually two very different things.
I was simply pointing out Neil Drury, Engineering Director of SWR stated in his interview with Richard Bowker that SWR are considering both the Desiros and 701s. That's it, that's the official position. That's all I was pointing out. End of.
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
4,818
If RTT allocations are correct, then it looks like 458406 has made its debut in passenger service today;
Missed that one coming back from Widnes - do you happen to know (roughly) when that happened please?
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,008
Why do l cynically half expect the 458s to be cascaded to Southeastern when all of the 701s are finally in service?

Proven, recently refurbished, rolling stock etc etc....
 

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,109
Location
SWR Metals
DECEMBER 2024- Is it likely that the Class 458/4s will remain solely on Weybridge services for the foreseeable future? Does anyone think that they may see use alongside the Class 450s on the SWML sometime? Is it still anticipated that once the troubled Class 701s see full introduction, said class will be fully withdrawn and scraped? Can I ask, Why are the Class 458/4s not seeing SWML use alongside the Class 450s currently? As the Class 450s are being operated to their maximum capabilities quite intensively, and their reliability has become hindered due to this. Could the reluctance to operate the Class 458/4s on said routes be due to the unsatisfactory cab layout, and ASLEF refusals? (discussed on this thread previously) Though what other reasons could be thus?
Training other depot drivers, up? That would be a full course to depots that haven't learned them before.(Fratton)(Guildford?)(Woking?)
Probably best to leave them where they are, I'd only need a day conversion myself or whatever it is, not sure if there is much difference to when I drove them as four then as five.
 
Last edited:

RacsoMoquette

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2023
Messages
252
Location
South Cambridgeshire
Why do l cynically half expect the 458s to be cascaded to Southeastern when all of the 701s are finally in service?

Proven, recently refurbished, rolling stock etc etc....
I am not sure that Southeastern would want 25 year old cast offs. Probably their desire would be to replace the (similarly aged Networkers) with a brand new fleet. Either the Class 458/4s will be stored or scraped once the full Class 701s enter service. (Though the Arterio roll out could take many years) Maybe the Class 458/4s could be used as a testbed for battery capabilities?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

If SWR require extra capacity on SWML services, they will probably favour the ex LNWR Class 350/2s (albeit modified for 3rd rail capabilities) As they a familiar with the Desiro range and they offer superb reliability and build quality.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,008
I am not sure that Southeastern would want 25 year old cast offs. Probably their desire would be to replace the (similarly aged Networkers) with a brand new fleet. Either the Class 458/4s will be stored or scraped once the full Class 701s enter service. (Though the Arterio roll out could take many years) Maybe the Class 458/4s could be used as a testbed for battery capabilities?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

If SWR require extra capacity on SWML services, they will probably favour the ex LNWR Class 350/2s (albeit modified for 3rd rail capabilities) As they a familiar with the Desiro range and they offer superb reliability and build quality.
Cynically l'm not sure all too often that what Southeastern wants comes into it. 25 year old "refurbished" castoffs are still newer than 30 year old trains that have had the bare minimum done to them...

I actually agree with you over the 350/2s. Whether DfT or HMT does though....

Oops, just realised that this was almost certainly on the wrong thread - sorry mods, will say no more.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,885
Location
UK
Just hopped from a 458/5 to a /4 and I have to say the seats are uncomfortable. I wish they'd kept the original seats they are much better

The seat backs are firm and an odd shape
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,882
Just hopped from a 458/5 to a /4 and I have to say the seats are uncomfortable. I wish they'd kept the original seats they are much better

The seat backs are firm and an odd shape
Just shows how seat comfort is objective. I think the new seats are a vast improvement and among the most comfortable on any current British train! Never liked the old ones. Mushy and no lower back support. The 450 seats are better.

But each to their own!
 

swtrains

Member
Joined
30 May 2024
Messages
162
Location
London
Just hopped from a 458/5 to a /4 and I have to say the seats are uncomfortable. I wish they'd kept the original seats they are much better

The seat backs are firm and an odd shape
Good to know someone else has common sense.

Anyone know what's happened to 535? 536 has been running by itself since yesterday, and hasn't been paired with 530, so are they both broken?
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,882
Good to know someone else has common sense.
The seats would have needed heavy refurbishment including the frames as they've had hard life and have been bashed around. Also, given that they're a non-standard, obsolete design I doubt if armrests are still available, but even if they were I'm betting that it was cheaper to get new seats.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,258
Well actually, the Engineering Director did say in that YouTube video that they are considering Desiros or 701s. He made that very clear.
Would you expect that the still not fully commissioned, in warranty, finickity units, or the 20 year old, out of warranty well proven units with much simpler power distribution would be more likely to see conversion?

What "Directors" say and what will happen are usually two very different things.
At this point in time, the proposal of battery conversion of Class 450/0s or Class 701/5s is about as speculative as any of the postings on this forum.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
20,820
Location
West of Andover
Likely that they are trying to create competition between two different fleets to keep conversion costs down. But SWR representatives have definitely said 450 and 701 being looked at.

450s more likely as you can run 8 carriages to Salisbury then drop 4 before continuing to Exeter. Whilst 701 formation of 5+5 might work well, presumably they 5 carriage sets are needed on the suburban hence ordering them in the first place. Can’t see them wanting to run 19 carriage trains all day to Exeter.
A single 450 will be full & standing from the start, if such an idiotic plan actually happens it will likely be triple 450s to Salisbury with pairs onwards to Exeter.

That assuming the suburban 3+2 seating doesn't drive customers away.

-----

Good to see 458406 entering service today
 

Top