anamyd
On Moderation
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2018
- Messages
- 3,011
Thanks for the info I can't see why this information isn't available publicly anyway...Speaking of 153's. 153325 (the first PRM compliant one) is out in service for the first time today.
Thanks for the info I can't see why this information isn't available publicly anyway...Speaking of 153's. 153325 (the first PRM compliant one) is out in service for the first time today.
Not "a couple of years", they're scheduled to be withdrawn in 2023 I believeBut what purpose would it serve? A lot of cost for a few extra seats in comparison with a doubled up 153, which would rarely be needed if the unit is doubled up. And remove the flexibility to run a single coach when that is all that's necessary. Remember these only have a lifespan of a couple of years with TfW and the leasing company isn't going to spend any more unless there is a clear future use and one that requires the units to be reformed as two cars.
ah right yes Maybe I should ask TfW, see if they know anythingCould also store them in the sidings down st Barry I suppose
Well-observed! Figured it wouldn't hurt to ask a couple of weeks laterYou asked this a couple of weeks ago and no one came up with a definite answer.
Because the units will have to be stored somewhere when they're not being used.Not quite sure why it’s that important.
And once they're in use, then what...?I'm guessing if the units are not needed for crew training and don’t need any significant work on them then they can be stored securely anywhere around the country until a few days before they’re needed.
I doubt that a factory assembling brand new trains will want to store some 17-20 year old early privatisation era DMUs.But for what it’s worth one possibility is that they have a good relationship with CAF so could use space at their Newport assembly plant.
The Conwy Valley's due to be a single 153 over the winter, but the pairs of 153s on the Borderlands line (joined because of traction issues at Hawarden bank as well as for capaity) may well be formed that way.That's almost exactly what I was thinking. Just couple the small cab of a PRM unit to the small cab of one of the 'temporary' extra units and consider them to be '2-car 153s'. If there are more non-PRM 153s than PRM ones, then form some 3-car sets too. 2-car 153 on Conwy Valley and Heart Of Wales and 3-car on Swansea - Pembroke Dock (in the summer at least) would probably work well, better than a PRM 153 on its own anyway.
There's due to be a long siding built along the SWML near Newport for stabling stock for large events in Cardiff; I don't know what progress has been made on this, but it could also be used to hold transferred units prior to their public use.I doubt that a factory assembling brand new trains will want to store some 17-20 year old early privatisation era DMUs.
Ah, OK, thanks for thatThere's due to be a long siding built along the SWML near Newport for stabling stock for large events in Cardiff; I don't know what progress has been made on this, but it could also be used to hold transferred units prior to their public use.
Once the new stock is in use, there'll be some Pacers being withdrawn at the end of the year, so that'll ease up space. But for the interim period in December, I can only assume that the depot managers have already considered the situation, and balanced the books well enough for it to work.
So if they were reformed during 2020, that would be around 2 or 3 years. Not nearly long enough to justify the cost involved, and why would TfW want it anyway?Not "a couple of years", they're scheduled to be withdrawn in 2023 I believe
No I totally agree, they rightly wouldn't see the point either!So if they were reformed during 2020, that would be around 2 or 3 years. Not nearly long enough to justify the cost involved, and why would TfW want it anyway?
Well-observed! Figured it wouldn't hurt to ask a couple of weeks later
Because the units will have to be stored somewhere when they're not being used.
And once they're in use, then what...?
I doubt that a factory assembling brand new trains will want to store some 17-20 year old early privatisation era DMUs.
Presumably, yes, as they've indicated they'll be keeping some in this press release.So does TfW have any derrogation for
Pacers beyond the dead line?
Presumably, yes, as they've indicated they'll be keeping some in this press release.
Yeup, that's taken as read (and referred to in the press release). Though the banners were cleverly phrased so as not to promise a specific date, just that they're "leaving soon": they're still correct if the date has moved a few months.Pacers are staying into 2020 with the 37's with derogations for both, the fine folk at the Senedd have realised that losing 30 trains overnight would leave the sheds a bit too bare. I also suppose they've sent the apprentices out with a scraper for the banners on the side of them promising their removal.
We keep on blaming factors such as PRM Modifications, 175 refurbishments etc. for the ongoing shortage of TFW units but I don't think this is the whole picture. You only have to follow Journey Check to see the large number of units that develop faults when out on the road resulting in their withdrawal from service.
Could also store them in the sidings down st Barry I suppose
That account doesn’t stack up with RTTs reporting of the morning service from Coryton, which was that all services ran, but typically with delays of up to 10 minutes building as the rush hour progressed?
Good to see that a 153 is inadequate these days, as the line used to be a basket case back in the 1980s.
That account doesn’t stack up with RTTs reporting of the morning service from Coryton, which was that all services ran, but typically with delays of up to 10 minutes building as the rush hour progressed?
Good to see that a 153 is inadequate these days, as the line used to be a basket case back in the 1980s.
Thanks for that infoThe latest issue of RAIL magazine states that TfW have derogations granted for the 37 + Mk2 sets, but are still waiting for derogations for Pacers and some 150/2s to be granted.
Oh yeah, I even saw that on your videoBarry is full of redundant coal wagons
and bogie freight van types.
The first City Line was a 153 vice 142 today, which subsequently got delayed along the route because of the long dwell times due to the sheer volume of passengers alighting and boarding. Instead of them replacing it, they decided to just cancel the remaining services from that diagram.
Then, 150229 on the 1834 from Radyr had one carriage in darkness, despite both being on earlier on today.
And to think I've just renewed my monthly season ticket just for this!
Ok, but your post said the first City Line was a 153 and that they cancelled subsequent services from that diagram. That seems to be a little different to what happened.The cancellations were from the afternoon. The 1334 from Radyr terminated at Cardiff Central, and all remaining services from then (i.e. 1415/1545/1715 from Coryton and 1504/1634/1804 from Radyr) cancelled.
But still none have left Canton sidings.Apparently, two more 170s due to be delivered this week.
Oh yeah, I even saw that your video