I didn’t think much of it at the time, but it has grown on me considerably since. Probably because of all the corporate dross (and one or two ill-conceived TOC-specific schemes of recent years) that Arriva, First Group and National Express have inflicted upon us since.I didn't like the Central Trains livery.
I have to say, I think that it looks better in reality than it does in photos, and is a marked improvement on the standard “Dynamic lines” livery, which I cannot stand.And, as I've previously said, this rather vivid 350:
View attachment 18794
Now I’m largely the opposite here (and hence in agreement with backontrack from a post earlier in this thread): I liked the SPT carmine and cream livery, but thought that it only really worked on the 156s with a more “traditional” outline. The blue stripe that was added to the livery on some of the 170s and the 334s really didn’t sit well in my opinion, and the traditional colour scheme didn’t suit the more modern body profiles. The Glasgow area electrics all looked better in the preceding orange and black scheme, which looked considerably more modern and I preferred overall.Current TOC liveries
I didn't like the Central Trains livery.
Thats a good point. The brightly coloured sub-sector symbols over a standard triple-tone grey scheme were very clever and looked very smart. I think the trainload coal liveried class 56s that I saw regularly in my youth (before all the collieries went!) looked particularly impressive, but there really was nothing that the livery didnt suit.Surprised no ones mentioned two-tone grey. Great - especially on a tractor.
Based on this and the following post from 33056, we really were treated to a good crop of bright freight liveries in the run up to privatisation, werent we? While I generally believe that freight locomotives should be grey (or, going back further in time, black) for ease of maintenance, and still have difficulty getting my head around most of the brightly coloured schemes of the current railfreight operators, I really cant fault any of the Loadhaul, Mainline Freight or Transrail (which was, after all, just an adaptation of trainload freight grey) liveries. Loadhaul in particular was superb. Such a bold scheme that suited everything that it was applied to.Loadhaul
Loadhaul
Loadhaul
Agreed. I simply can't fault it. The 60s in particular looked really good in it:Based on this and the following post from 33056, we really were treated to a good crop of bright freight liveries in the run up to privatisation, weren’t we? While I generally believe that freight locomotives should be grey (or, going back further in time, black) for ease of maintenance, and still have difficulty getting my head around most of the brightly coloured schemes of the current railfreight operators, I really can’t fault any of the Loadhaul, Mainline Freight or Transrail (which was, after all, just an adaptation of trainload freight grey) liveries. Loadhaul in particular was superb. Such a bold scheme that suited everything that it was applied to.
Loadhaul
Loadhaul
Loadhaul
Isn't it common knowledge that you have to look a long way to find a class of loco that doesn't look good in Loadhaul![]()
Looks fine to me.
Does anyone here have any favourite TOC liveries?
One of my faves is Scotrail's 'saltire' livery. Hull Trains have a great livery - their old one was good too. Grand Central's 180s, with their orange strips running down the train, look very sharp.
Perhaps surprisingly, I quite liked First Scotrail's 'barbie' livery too. I'm not quite sure why. It looked particularly good on the Class 90's, I thought.
Any others? Feel free to post your least favourite, too. I never liked Greater Anglia's, or anything National Express - I hate grey.
Past TOCs count, too.
Foreign trains look downright weird without the yellow fronts!
Indeed. Continental liveries (and further afield) are designed to work without the need for a yellow front, and in my opinion often look all the better for it.I'd have to disagree with that. In terms of actual colour schemes, two of my favourites from my time abroad look very normal with having the livery on the front too.
Indeed. Continental liveries (and further afield) are designed to work without the need for a yellow front, and in my opinion often look all the better for it.
In fact I would say that it is some UK liveries that look forced when the yellow front end looks to have been left as an afterthought, rather than being incorporated into the livery in any way.
It honestly doesn't look that bad on a 'Hoover'. It does look slightly ridiculous when it's hauling a rake of MK1s on a heritage line, though.
It honestly doesn't look that bad on a 'Hoover'.
One thing I really liked about NatEx's "post-privatisation" TOC identities was the liveries they chose and the avoidance of 'corporate' marking of territory.
I'd have to disagree with that. In terms of actual colour schemes, two of my favourites from my time abroad look very normal with having the livery on the front too.
Also been a fan of SNCF 'En Voyage' (see left)
...As well as the RATP/STIF livery found on the MI09 stock on the RER A
However, put a yellow front on a french loco, and it just looks a little weird - search on google for BB 7321, it ain't pretty!
Ok, so it's not a yellow front as we'd know it, it's the result of the TER Bourgogne livery being applied to a loco. BB 7321 was the only one painted in the livery to match the rakes of coaches used on these services, and to be honest, you can see why!