Minilad
Established Member
Stratford upon Avon has a sizeable headhunt to enable run rounds
It sure does.Stratford upon Avon has a sizeable headhunt to enable run rounds
Nice picture! There were loco-hauled mail trains every night, so I would assume it was those in the main.
London Bridge definitely used to have a loop at the end of platform 13 to release locomotives. Don't know whether it survived the remodel (I doubt it some how). Finally managed to find a picture, knew I wasn't going mad!
As an aside, any idea what trains would of used this & why?
View attachment 76050
Nice picture! There were loco-hauled mail trains every night, so I would assume it was those in the main.
London Bridge definitely used to have a loop at the end of platform 13 to release locomotives. Don't know whether it survived the remodel (I doubt it some how). Finally managed to find a picture, knew I wasn't going mad!
As an aside, any idea what trains would of used this & why?
View attachment 76050
It is an MLV. I nearly added the loco-hauled East Grinstead / Uckfield services, but I don't think they ran round as the station was too busy (it would have required the adjacent platform to be free), so the loco was released by another loco coming in light engine to take out the stock. At least in the peaks, anyway. Perhaps it was different in the middle of the day London Bridge was way quieter then (people would probably be quite shocked at how quiet it was outside the peaks).Oooh. Is that an MLV ?.
The trains to East Grinstead that are now 171s used to run from London Bridge hauled by 33s. A diesel LOCO island !.
It is an MLV. I nearly added the loco-hauled East Grinstead / Uckfield services, but I don't think they ran round as the station was too busy (it would have required the adjacent platform to be free), so the loco was released by another loco coming in light engine to take out the stock. At least in the peaks, anyway. Perhaps it was different in the middle of the day London Bridge was way quieter then (people would probably be quite shocked at how quiet it was outside the peaks).
The trains to East Grinstead that are now 171s used to run from London Bridge hauled by 33s. A diesel LOCO island !.
Most East Grinstead services are from London Victoria and are EMUsAre there any regularly scheduled Class 171s to East Grinstead from London Bridge these days?
Do you mean the peak time Thameslink Class 700s?
No worriesI was just trying to make the point (obviously not very well) that the peak London Bridge services were Thameslink Class 700 EMUs rather than diesel.
Are there any regularly scheduled Class 171s to East Grinstead from London Bridge these days?
Do you mean the peak time Thameslink Class 700s?
Most East Grinstead services are from London Victoria and are EMUs
The Uckfield service is Class 171s, but those start at Oxted at present
It is an MLV. I nearly added the loco-hauled East Grinstead / Uckfield services, but I don't think they ran round as the station was too busy (it would have required the adjacent platform to be free), so the loco was released by another loco coming in light engine to take out the stock. At least in the peaks, anyway. Perhaps it was different in the middle of the day London Bridge was way quieter then (people would probably be quite shocked at how quiet it was outside the peaks).
Only a few peak hour services to/from London Bridge were worked by Class 33s. All the others were DEMUs.
In 1981 (according to 1H81 publication, Peter Watts publications),
London Bridge dep. 17:20 to Uckfield; (thence 19:10 to East Croydon).
17:34 & 17:50 to East Grinstead.
Morning: East Grinstead to London Bridge at 07:25, 08:01, 08:25. (one formed from stock off East Croydon at 07:29)
(All SX)
I think there were one or two other workings in the 1970s.
But in any case the class 33 workings were basically to/from East Grinstead (just one evening Uckfield out of the 8, later 6).Sorry I never remember whether it is East Grinstead or UCKFIELD that is still diesel. The 171s never go to Victoria - ventilation better at London Bridge aiui !.
Yes London Bridge outside the peaks was rather dead in the terminating platforms. Just the shuttle to Victoria iirc. Certainly I can remember in the early 90s assuming wrongly that I would easily get a train to East Croydon in the late evening !.
Really? I had always assumed that, apart from services transferred to Thameslink, there wasn't a lot of difference between now and pre-remodelling.
Quite so. IIRC around 1980 the offpeak fast(ish) service was the 1/2 hourly Tats and Cats (Tattenham/Caterham) ex Charing Cross plus a Brighton line stopper, whereas from Victoria there were 11tph. It improved when the through Uckfield service started. Then along came ThameslinkCompared to Victoria, which is admittedly very frequent, London Bridge could mean a long wait. And in those days there was not much to do, food wise, if you wanted to kill time. The Thameslink 2000 services have certainly made a difference.
When I look at it I'm amazed there's enough length to turn around a loco. Must be tightGreat Yarmouth can still technically do it. Somehow the ground frame between platforms 2 and 3 survived the resignalling. If it'll ever be used however...
And BembridgePretty certain none exist now, but some terminal stations had a traverser or sector plate at the terminal end, a few (Ventnor?) had a turntable!
Bembridge was a sector plate; Ventnor was replaced by 3-way points at some stage (guess 30s).When I look at it I'm amazed there's enough length to turn around a loco. Must be tight
And Bembridge
A sector plate is similar to half a turntable. pivoted at one end rather than in the centre.
Bembridge was a sector plate
You appear to be right, though it is called both in different online sources - today's learning pointWithout wanting to correct, looking online it seems it was a turntable?
You can see in this picture from disused stations
Link: http://disused-stations.org.uk/b/bembridge/index.shtml
![]()
I would say there was no point in turning locos on the IoW, period. They were tank engines on short lines, perfectly capable of running bunker first. In fact every photo on the Disused Stations website shows locos with bunkers oriented towards the end of the branch.There would be no point in turning locos at Bembridge as there was no means of turning at the other end of the branch (Brading)
I would say there was no point in turning locos on the IoW, period. They were tank engines on short lines, perfectly capable of running bunker first. In fact every photo on the Disused Stations website shows locos with bunkers oriented towards the end of the branch.
What was at Bembridge may have been either a turntable or a sector plate, but if it was a turntable I bet they never turned the loco round, and only turned it enough to access the loop. In fact the first actual photo on that website shows a railwayman making what appears to be a great deal of effort to move the thing at all!