Only at Arena, Bedworth and Bermuda Park are 3 both ways.
Whoops read that as arena only!
Only at Arena, Bedworth and Bermuda Park are 3 both ways.
Coventry crews currently don't sign any other diesels as far as I am aware, so training would be required.
6 car lengths on the up, 3 on the down
Why? Surely it would be better to be the same length both ways?
Perhaps get Virgin to run a Voyager there if they have a spare one. Don't their crews sign this route as part of Euston to Nuneaton via Chiltern lines diversion?
Running from where to where? and do you really think this is something Virgin would do?
What a farce not stopping at Arena on match days. Does this apply to rugby matches as well as football?
Any spare 150s on weekends?
If so send one to Bedford - Bletchley to release the 153 to Coventry to Nuneaton.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Why? Surely it would be better to be the same length both ways?
Perhaps get Virgin to run a Voyager there if they have a spare one. Don't their crews sign this route as part of Euston to Nuneaton via Chiltern lines diversion?
You actually mention a good point re the platform lengths. One option that may/could have been considered is putting the 6 car platform on the down for the matchday train to reverse - it would have to travel for around a minute wrong direction (back to cov) and switch to the up line at the crossovers at three spires. Unless that's just a compete no go.
I reckon phase 2 will have to be completed before any service stops there on
match days.
A famous phrase from a supermarket - 'Every Little Helps' :PAn extra 153 wouldn't help that much of I'm honest. It's packed at peak hours as it is.
[/QUOTE]A famous phrase from a supermarket - 'Every Little Helps' :P
That may well be a third 153 unless LM have thought of that already and the second 153 comes from moving a 150 to Bedford - Bletchley route.
There will be a crossover at Arena from Down to Up line, the original idea was to use that and the crossover at Three Spires as a loop so an up freight (Murco) could run round without the need for a new loop.
Too short, currently the Murco train goes down to Coventry North Sidings and runs round there, the new bay stops that from happening.
Regarding the inaccessibility to the Arena on matchdays, it does make you wonder whether Coventry City FC should never have left Highfield Road.
[/QUOTE]A famous phrase from a supermarket - 'Every Little Helps' :P
That may well be a third 153 unless LM have thought of that already and the second 153 comes from moving a 150 to Bedford - Bletchley route.
Hmm what will the murco train do then, assuming phase 2 happens?
Be a bit of a faff splitting in two in LM's Coventry yard, reversing and doing it that way. (Same way as at murco)
It's a nickname for the single-carriage Class 153 units.Excuse my ignorance. What is a dogbox.
Used to be a well known rumour between traincrew that 172's were to take over when the new stations opened.
Regarding the inaccessibility to the Arena on matchdays, it does make you wonder whether Coventry City FC should never have left Highfield Road.
I visited the Ricoh Arena last year in my quest to "do the 92" and found it far and away the least accessible football ground I've ever visited by public transport. No trains, hardly any buses, a 3 mile walk from Bedworth before the game, a 4 mile walk into Coventry afterwards.
In comparison, I went to Brighton's new ground at Falmer and, despite it being a similar "middle of nowhere, out of town stadium", found it much more accessible. Why? Because there's a regular matchday train service between Brighton and Falmer, your match ticket entitles you to free train travel to the ground (so no queuing for rail tickets) and the service is 4 and 8 car units.
So if it can be done in Brighton, why not in Coventry, especially as their crowds are barely half what Brighton attract?
I visited the Ricoh Arena last year in my quest to "do the 92" and found it far and away the least accessible football ground I've ever visited by public transport. No trains, hardly any buses, a 3 mile walk from Bedworth before the game, a 4 mile walk into Coventry afterwards.
In comparison, I went to Brighton's new ground at Falmer and, despite it being a similar "middle of nowhere, out of town stadium", found it much more accessible. Why? Because there's a regular matchday train service between Brighton and Falmer, your match ticket entitles you to free train travel to the ground (so no queuing for rail tickets) and the service is 4 and 8 car units.
So if it can be done in Brighton, why not in Coventry, especially as their crowds are barely half what Brighton attract?
Even "well-known messroom rumours" are not all what they appear to be, 100% of the time.
It can happen like that for the Ricoh but it is dependent on 'phase 2' which means a new bay platform at Coventry, two trains an hour (minimum) and a turn back facility. However, despite a date of December 2016 being banded about and some extra money from the government no firm plans exist to actually do it or where the longer trains will come from.
And don;t get me started on the planned electrification i.e. the electric spine....
I went for an exhibition, and was staying slightly out of town. Found Coventry generally not the easiest place for public transport if I'm honest! I even had a bus interchange in the hospital which is unheard of!!
I really don't see the point of the station if I'm honest if they aren't going to use bigger trains and utilise Matchday traffic. I can't see it getting much use at other times.
Id be surprised if 172s ended up there, they need them more on the Snow Hills.
Someone must have realised at LM, or listened to the crew (here's hoping), that one dogbox isn't adequate for the current service for the most part, let alone the extra stops.
No, quite correct. But a few years ago it was taken as a 'done deal' that 172's would take over when the stations opened.
Personally I think they will double the dogbox up. It seems the only logical thing to do short term. It's crowded enough in the peaks without stopping at 2 new stations.
Someone must have realised at LM, or listened to the crew (here's hoping), that one dogbox isn't adequate for the current service for the most part, let alone the extra stops.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
December 2016 is ambitious! Have you been listening to the local rail user group by any chance?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It has a retail park opposite which should attract a few more passengers.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
170's have weirdly not been mentioned, yet when the chase is wired won't some of them be released?
I think you are doing the chaps at LM a dis-service there, they knew from the start there was no stock to do it, they are facing the same challenge with Kenilworth I suspect.