Rick1984
Member
- Joined
- 23 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 1,038
Thanks I was wondering how they actually side the bit under the ECML, that article has explained it
A website article worth reading from New Civil Engineer:
Future of Rail | Curved box jack under East Coast Main Line junction
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/th...out-east-coast-main-line-junction-19-02-2020/
“Slide into a curved slot in the embankment”, is how I’d summarise it. But being controlled by a rail system in pre-bored tunnels is the novel aspect.Thanks I was wondering how they actually side the bit under the ECML, that article has explained it
Will it be for a level crossing?Thanks for the brilliant compilation Crun! The music is soothing too . I noticed that some of the pantographs are almost vertical on the mainline in places; does the OHLE have to be high there for a particular reason?
A former level crossing, yes. Hurn Road LC closed in the early 1990s, and the wire heights haven't been readjusted to reflect the closure.Will it be for a level crossing?
Is that because there’s another crossing a bit further north? It may be sensible not to change it, assuming a pantograph still works efficiently at any height within its designed scope?A former level crossing, yes. Hurn Road LC closed in the early 1990s, and the wire heights haven't been readjusted to reflect the closure.
A former level crossing, yes. Hurn Road LC closed in the early 1990s, and the wire heights haven't been readjusted to reflect the closure.
Yes, there are several crossing north of Hurn Rd; they are (in order): Woodcroft, Helpston, Maxey, Lolham & Tallington. I'm not sure if the wire height is constant between them though!Is that because there’s another crossing a bit further north? It may be sensible not to change it, assuming a pantograph still works efficiently at any height within its designed scope?
Apologies if off topic for the diveunder works.
As am I, and after several years' hard graft at uni, it's the industry I'm now a part ofMany thanks for the explanation 59CosG95! I'm very interested in electrification and improvement projects but not too savvy with the technical/engineering side of things.
Thanks for the brilliant compilation Crun! The music is soothing too . I noticed that some of the pantographs are almost vertical on the mainline in places; does the OHLE have to be high there for a particular reason?
A former level crossing, yes. Hurn Road LC closed in the early 1990s, and the wire heights haven't been readjusted to reflect the closure.
I think we're thinking of different crossings! Hurn Road is here:In the late 1980's I used to cycle across the ECML in the evenings to get from the Bretton side to my then girlfriend's flat in Werrington. It was a question of opening a gate, looking left and right, listening all the time and riding quickly to the gate on the eastern side of the ECML. I used to also cross the ECML by bike heading to Glinton and Arthur Mellows Village School where the Peterborough Cycling Club used to meet once a month. It is now a manned crossing with a barrier.
I think we're thinking of different crossings! Hurn Road is here:
View attachment 75529
The one which most closely matches your description of a manned crossing with a barrier en route to Glinton is Woodcroft Rd LC, which is here:
View attachment 75530
Woodcroft still has manual barriers.
I think we're thinking of different crossings! Hurn Road is here:
View attachment 75529
The one which most closely matches your description of a manned crossing with a barrier en route to Glinton is Woodcroft Rd LC, which is here:
View attachment 75530
Woodcroft still has manual barriers.
I used the old, gated crossing on Hurn Road to get to Werrington and the Woodcroft Crossing with the barriers to get to Glinton. Both would have
been around the mid to late 80's.
That's how I remember both crossings, back to the subject though I'm glad they've finally got a wheelchair accessible footbridge at Cock Lane.
Photographs of heavy machinery at a standstill taken from the Cock Lane bridge with no sign of any activity or workers on 28th March 2020:
The standstill will be due to coronavirus. However what impact would a potential 12 week stoppage have on the project in terms of the critical possessions where train are suspended or diverted via GE/GN Joint Line plus the proposed blockades and commissioning of said dive under.
I’d have thought almost the entire possession programme (at least those for upgrades) will have to move right “across the board” by however many weeks they eventually decide?A very significant effect, I would imagine. Unlikely to be the only job in a similar position either.
(I must stress that I don’t know!)