Techniquest
Veteran Member
I've been going to start this thread for several weeks now, so before I forget, here it is!
For weeks now, perhaps even months, I've been curious as to what other people go for when they're out photting. I'm not talking about different classes of motive power, far too subjective to discuss sensibly I think, although if it remains a sensible discussion on the pros and cons of particular classes for photography then let's have it.
What I'm curious about is more composure kind of things. What makes a good photo to you? I'm not wanting to just read generic things, I'm interested in what you as an individual thinks makes a good photo. Is there a particular location you like to go to where nature lays itself out ideally for photography, or one where linesiding is within an easy walk? Do you prefer ground-level photos or footbridge-height lineside photos? I could probably go on for a while with questions similar to these, so I hope you get the idea.
Part of the inspiration for this thread has come from numerous POTW rounds where I've had zero votes or just a couple. So I'm inspired to see what other people think makes a good photo. I know I've not long ago today made a post on someone else's thread saying about what one wishes to convey in a photo, so I've included an example of a photo I'm really glad came out the way it did, purely by accident too!
I like this one a lot partly because I'm unlikely to ever get another shot of 379s at Atherstone, but partly because, after I looked at it on the laptop, I noticed the 390 coming into view too. If only I'd noticed it when I was videoing the 379s, I'd have known I was about to be bowled...
This also caught my eye on the way home that night (20th June 2011):
And an example of how what looked like a darn decent shot (non-tripod!) to me was ruined when the lights were pointed out by a more photography-orientated friend. Judge for yourselves:
Anyway, I'll leave the floor open to you all.
For weeks now, perhaps even months, I've been curious as to what other people go for when they're out photting. I'm not talking about different classes of motive power, far too subjective to discuss sensibly I think, although if it remains a sensible discussion on the pros and cons of particular classes for photography then let's have it.
What I'm curious about is more composure kind of things. What makes a good photo to you? I'm not wanting to just read generic things, I'm interested in what you as an individual thinks makes a good photo. Is there a particular location you like to go to where nature lays itself out ideally for photography, or one where linesiding is within an easy walk? Do you prefer ground-level photos or footbridge-height lineside photos? I could probably go on for a while with questions similar to these, so I hope you get the idea.
Part of the inspiration for this thread has come from numerous POTW rounds where I've had zero votes or just a couple. So I'm inspired to see what other people think makes a good photo. I know I've not long ago today made a post on someone else's thread saying about what one wishes to convey in a photo, so I've included an example of a photo I'm really glad came out the way it did, purely by accident too!
I like this one a lot partly because I'm unlikely to ever get another shot of 379s at Atherstone, but partly because, after I looked at it on the laptop, I noticed the 390 coming into view too. If only I'd noticed it when I was videoing the 379s, I'd have known I was about to be bowled...
This also caught my eye on the way home that night (20th June 2011):
And an example of how what looked like a darn decent shot (non-tripod!) to me was ruined when the lights were pointed out by a more photography-orientated friend. Judge for yourselves:
Anyway, I'll leave the floor open to you all.