I asked what the huge stuff we don't know about Covid-19 is and you're not coming back with anything huge. The long term effects might be zero, like lots of other viruses our bodies deal with.
You want a list of what we don't know we don't know?
Obviously I can't do that.
I don't mean there is a huge impact we don't know about. I mean there is a huge amount we can't know because this disease is so new.
The long term effects might be zero indeed like lots of other viruses. They might not be, like some other viruses.
We also know that some (a very small number) of healthy young people do suffer seriously if they get coronavirus.
But here's the thing - what is the logic behind assuming that after half a year or so we know enough about coronavirus to dismiss any potential risks to a healthy, young person as so small as to not be worth worrying about, but conclude that a tested, licensed vaccine must be a much greater risk because there might be things about the vaccine we won't know until it's been in use for a few years?
I don't think it makes sense.