Bantamzen
Established Member
They raise it every year by that amount and virgin trains is no different
I mean they could increase it by more than RPI+1%.
They raise it every year by that amount and virgin trains is no different
I haven't had a problem. Bad or otherwise.
I absolutely don't deny staff are ever in the wrong. I am sure they are. Are you denying passengers are ever in the wrong?
What every other toc manage s to treat their passengers with courtesy and they still get the RPI+1% increase.I mean they could increase it by more than RPI+1%.
What every other toc manage s to treat their passengers with courtesy and they still get the RPI+1% increase.
As @DarloRich says though, when you've thousands of commuters flowing through, with the pressure on to get them all onto their correct train, the time it takes to check on or more restriction codes may just be too long.
Well that's not the impression the disputes sub forum gives. But staff being grumpy and conducting revenue checks does not have a quantifiable effect on revenue, but stopping checks & waiving all and sundry through most certainly could, especially in the eyes of the owners, any shareholders and most of all DfT. This is how the world turns.
@yorkie It is clear that you don't like your view being challenged and expect it simply to be accepted as gospel without disagreement.
I stand by my point. I use Euston often, I have never had a problem. I know why i haven't had a problem but it seems expressing that is not popular.
Yet this thread highlights a particular problem with VTWC staff that doesn't appear to exist on other TOCs..multiple incidents of people being turned away with valid tickets. SWR manage it and Waterloo is a busier station than Euston
I suspect you mostly use Euston using a simple ticket (single, return, Travelcard or season) from Fenny Stratford to Euston/R1256, no? And mostly using LNR, which is an entirely separate barrier line which is not the subject of this discussion?[1] It isn't really relevant, then.
[1] There is no cross-TOC ticket checking at Euston between VT/Avanti and LNR. Each checks their own services exclusively, plus LNR checks for LO.
I believe one of the issues is Euston VTWC regularly don't accept outboundary or split travelcards as being valid on their services , particularly when one is on oysterWaterloo has automatic barriers - these probably just accept these "potentially awkward" tickets and so they aren't questioned.
When I've had a season Travelcard I have on multiple occasions used that to pass a barrier to avoid arguments over validity on a possibly obscure but valid ticket or combination thereof. As SWR runs trains that stop inside the Zones, this will work at all the barriers at Waterloo.
I believe one of the issues is Euston VTWC regularly don't accept outboundary or split travelcards as being valid on their services , particularly when one is on oyster
@NetworkRailEUS
@MoneySavingExp
had a valid split ticket today with seat reservation from EUS to BNS (16:43). staff refused to let me on the train, saying i had a fraudulent ticket. Felt humiliated in front of other passengers. Can you clarify the rules on having a split ticket?
Really? How long does it take you to read a restriction code? About 30 seconds I would say.
If the staff are not up to the job, give them the appropriate training. If they are still not, get rid and get some who are competent.
(An online "is it valid or not" would be quite useful, but the danger is that it will itself make incorrect judgements where TOCs have created unimplementable restriction codes, e.g. all of LNR's Super Off Peaks which contain the unimplementable line "a connecting service may be used to complete a journey begun at a correct time").
Yet this thread highlights a particular problem with VTWC staff that doesn't appear to exist on other TOCs..multiple incidents of people being turned away with valid tickets. SWR manage it and Waterloo is a busier station than Euston
Now chuck in thousands of people trying to push past onto their trains, people shouting and moaning at you, and all the time your manager catching you expecting you to take less than 30 seconds. Good luck with your new job....
Like I said, the disputes forum doesn't agree with you...
Really? How long does it take you to read a restriction code? About 30 seconds I would say.
If the staff are not up to the job, give them the appropriate training. If they are still not, get rid and get some who are competent.
Noticed condition 14 splits have been mentioned a few times? What are these? A combination of tickets where the split is at a station where the train calls?VTWC always opposed the use of 19(c)/Condition 14 splits, so I suspect the management may have been in on this specific one. They even at one point managed to convince Silverlink not to sell such splits at the ticket office - there was clear signage about this at MKC at one point.
Noticed condition 14 splits have been mentioned a few times? What are these? A combination of tickets where the split is at a station where the train calls?
Find a technological solution? Like some sort of gate which can read a ticket and only open for those with valid tickets?It is what it is, so we ether put humans on there with all the stresses and strains, or as we seem to agree on find a technological solution so that staff can be released to conduct more complex queries, offer assistance etc. I'm pretty certain they would welcome less stress and the opportunity to make people's travels less stressful.
Ah I see. So sort of like having a Network West Midlands card from Birmingham but then buying a single Wolverhampton to Manchester? But with the train not needing to call at Wolverhampton (although it probably would anyway)?A combination involving a season ticket where the train does not need to call. The common use-case for these is south WCML commuters from stations south of MKC who normally travel with LNR wishing to buy a ticket to extend their journey to somewhere (e.g. Manchester) they're off to for the weekend.
Ah I see. So sort of like having a Network West Midlands card from Birmingham but then buying a single Wolverhampton to Manchester? But with the train not needing to call at Wolverhampton (although it probably would anyway)?
For example a zone 1-6 travelcard and an single ticket from headstone lane to Manchester would be an example of a condition 14 split.Ah I see. So sort of like having a Network West Midlands card from Birmingham but then buying a single Wolverhampton to Manchester? But with the train not needing to call at Wolverhampton (although it probably would anyway)?
And as if timing could be any more perfect, it seems they are still at it:
https://twitter.com/Qanscious/status/1204082733754060801
Condition 14s is where one ticket is a season ticket it is to allow travel for season ticket holders further along the line without them having to get off.Under a regular combination of tickets, why is it that the train must call at the station where the tickets are split, but not with these condition 14 splits?
Wouldn't evidence be needed to suspend someone rather than an allegation that a ticket inspector said someone's ticket was fraudulent? I get that there are a lot of complaints being discussed here but there are surely going to be a lot of allegations about any revenue staff who refuse to budge on a ticket?For such allegation of misconduct, the staff member needs to be suspended immediately while it is thoroughly investigated. As a minimum, the TOC needs to pay a large sum in compensation if found wanting.
I hope the lol means that you know this is unlikely. First-staffed Paddington is the other place I have had valid offpeak tickets rejected. I also last had trouble at Liverpool Street back in First Great Eastern days.
Wouldn't evidence be needed to suspend someone rather than an allegation that a ticket inspector said someone's ticket was fraudulent? I get that there are a lot of complaints being discussed here but there are surely going to be a lot of allegations about any revenue staff who refuse to budge on a ticket?