XCTurbostar
Established Member
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 1,883
Any chance we could merge the two threads together and rename one? There's quite a lot of overlap.
I thought it was a 2019 introduction date. Sooner the better tbh. The 153's are "tired" and the 150's are needed elsewhere
Oh, apologies, I thought you were deriding the company in some way. December 2018 is the plan for introducing the three 230/2s.
WMTrains Livery Updates:
Class 139:
001: LM livery
002: LM livery
Class 150:
105: LM livery
107: LM livery
109: LM livery
Class 153:
334: LM livery
354: LM livery
356: LM livery
364: LM livery
365: LM livery
366: LM livery
371: LM livery
375: LM livery
Class 170:
501: LM livery
502: LM livery
503: LM livery
504: LM livery
505: LM livery
506: LM livery
507: LM livery
508: LM livery
509: LM livery
510: LM livery
511: LM livery
512: LM livery
513: LM livery
514: LM livery
515: LM livery
516: LM livery
517: LM livery
Any chance we could merge the two threads together and rename one? There's quite a lot of overlap.
Agreed. Personally, I would say *anything* that there can be three of (even 142s) would be better than two 15x.
Not all 15x units! Are you saying a six car triple 142 is better than a six car double 159? Something tells me you’ll be disagreed with there...
I think the point @Bletchleyite is making is that 2 units is by far and away insufficient for the Vale. 3 units (even if they are pacers) are preferable to 2 units.
Yes, but that's completely irrelevant, as that is one train, when what the Vale needs is (at least) three trains to provide some resilience and additional capacity. It's like saying that you'd rather have triple length voyagers on every XC service, but as a result you can only run a third of the trains.I know and the point I’m making is that two 159 units which have three cars make up the same as three pacer units which have two cars - plus they are much nicer inside!
Yes, but that's completely irrelevant, as that is one train, when what the Vale needs is (at least) three trains to provide some resilience and additional capacity. It's like saying that you'd rather have triple length voyagers on every XC service, but as a result you can only run a third of the trains.
Oh sorry. You mean a higher frequency don’t you!
As I said, just a suggestion. Can I suggest you put the list on your OP then?This thread is to discuss specifically the WM Livery updates not the new franchise in general!
A clear example is the GWR livery thread. If you want to find livery status you can quickly and easily find it! If you have to rummage through the current WM Franchise thread it is a pain. Just like when the 800s were introduced as well as being a main thread there was also an extra thread on diagrams.
Therefore I personally would like to keep this thread separate as it is easier to find the specific information people may want on the livery updates.
On my what sorry?As I said, just a suggestion. Can I suggest you put the list on your OP then?
The opening post of the threadOn my what sorry?
Strangely enough, I was considering just that the other day to enliven the plethora of light grey based liveries we're faced with these days!If we can stop cancellations on the Vale LM NEWCO can paint the units any colour they like. May i suggest WW1 battleship "dazzle" livery?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage
You might have more credibility if you followed your own advice.This thread is to discuss specifically the WM Livery updates not the new franchise in general!
A clear example is the GWR livery thread. If you want to find livery status you can quickly and easily find it! If you have to rummage through the current WM Franchise thread it is a pain. Just like when the 800s were introduced as well as being a main thread there was also an extra thread on diagrams.
Therefore I personally would like to keep this thread separate as it is easier to find the specific information people may want on the livery updates.
I’ve amended itYou might have more credibility if you followed your own advice.
In the very next post after this you disregard it.
You'd hope that they'd retain the typical yellow Turbostar "bib" below the cab windscreens, although the treatment of the yellow ends on the released images doesn't suggest that any thought has gone into incorporating the yellow panel into the livery as a whole.It'll be interesting how a yellow panel is managed on the gangway less 172/0s when they arrive from LO. I guess they'll have to have something but a yellow block up the middle of the front would look terrible
Hmm I was thinking this too.. it’s an issue for all stock that doesn’t have a gangway so the 170s, 150s, 323s, 319s and even the people mover will have an issue with this. My prediction is that the yellow will be increased after the initial livery has been reviewed or once they realise that it doesn’t really work with all the different types.You'd hope that they'd retain the typical yellow Turbostar "bib" below the cab windscreens, although the treatment of the yellow ends on the released images doesn't suggest that any thought has gone into incorporating the yellow panel into the livery as a whole.
Join the clubPersonally I think any UK train front looks weird if not with a yellow front!
Hmm I was thinking this too.. it’s an issue for all stock that doesn’t have a gangway so the 170s, 150s, 323s, 319s and even the people mover will have an issue with this. My prediction is that the yellow will be increased after the initial livery has been reviewed or once they realise that it doesn’t really work with all the different types.
The 139s aren't being replacedSeeing as all of those aren't due to stay with the franchise longer term, it's not an issue, they'll just be given some stickers over the LM branding and left to see out their days. That only leaves the 172/0s and the 230s to have a yellow patch applied, although the 230s do have a flat portion to their front which could easily be used instead (or alternatively, left unyellowed as they should meet the latest requirements)
The 139s aren't being replaced
Certainly could do that on a 139 or 150; though it would look really awfulGood point, had missed out that they'd been mentioned as I'd scanned for numbers, not names. But I suppose that for those you would just draw two lines down from the central windshield and define that as the "gangway door" - you can do the same sort of thing with the 150s.
Good point, had missed out that they'd been mentioned as I'd scanned for numbers, not names. But I suppose that for those you would just draw two lines down from the central windshield and define that as the "gangway door" - you can do the same sort of thing with the 150s.
What do you mean anyway?