Old Hill Bank
Member
You would end up with eight units with no loo, if the 172/0s were to move to LM you will need to send them to works for loo fitment so you might as well do the job properly and change the cab ends as well.
Complete fabrication?
I do know Northern were in talks with the Dft about recieving extra stock next year.
I would assume that's for EMUs to run LiverpoolManchester and LiverpoolWigan services, which lines will be electrified by December 2014.
You mean having the gangwayed cabs autocoupled? a'la LUL?
Such as:
(Cab) LO 172 - SPC - LM 172 (Cab) - BSI - (Cab) LM 172 - SPC - LO 172 (Cab)?
Provided you had an equal amount in each direction and they can come back as such of an evening, I can see it as a good way of having a higher availability 4 car fleet, that you can even knock to 2 car off peak, provided you get the cabs the right way round...
And what does this person claim would replace the 159s? There are no spare DMUs, or new ones being built, and no electrification of the SW diesel lines will be forthcoming for at least ten years I reckon.
The nearest thing to equivelants to 158s/159s are probably 444s and 5-WESes, and you need electrification for those. 175s are also equivelant to 158s/159s in some respects but lack corridor connections for portion working.And I can't see SWT giving up the 159's without a fight. There are no real equivalents on the network to swap them with (given the need for portion working)
No, 442s and 444s would not be suitable for the Salisbury line. The whole thing is built around 3/6/9-car operations with portioning. 5-car units just wouldn't work.
It *could* work on the grounds you'd re-work it so that it was a mix of 5 and 10 car workings rather than 3/6/9.
You'd lose a few seats going from 6 car to 5 car, but you'd gain going 9 to 10.
Either way, a slightly bigger problem is that currently any EMU heading to Salisbury would fail shortly after Basingstoke owing to lack of infrastructure......![]()
Mabe a couple of 158s may move when the 458 mods are done?
http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=86760It's not just lengths, though, it's the portion working that you'd lose. There are quite a lot of services that run 6-car to Salisbury then 3-car to Exeter (with the dropped portion going back to London or on to Bristol), or 9-car to Salisbury then 6-car to Exeter. These kinds of scenarios don't work if you change 6-car to 5-car and 9-car to 10-car.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I don't see how lengthening of some EMUs on the Windsor lines frees up DMUs working the diesel lines round Salisbury.
It's not just lengths, though, it's the portion working that you'd lose. There are quite a lot of services that run 6-car to Salisbury then 3-car to Exeter (with the dropped portion going back to London or on to Bristol), or 9-car to Salisbury then 6-car to Exeter. These kinds of scenarios don't work if you change 6-car to 5-car and 9-car to 10-car.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I don't see how lengthening of some EMUs on the Windsor lines frees up DMUs working the diesel lines round Salisbury.
0515 from Yeovil Junction (6 car to 9 car)
0543 from Salisbury (6 car to 9 car)
1620 to Exeter (6 car to 8 car)
1720 to Exeter (6 car to 9 car)
1750 to Exeter (6 car to 8 car)
http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/extra-capacity-on-south-west-trains.aspx
So are the 365s going to be painted in a mix of Southern, First Capital Connect and (part) SouthEastern colours then? Once you merge those, you could call it all 'one railway'...
Just heard someone claiming without a source that 21 SWT 159's will be heading to Northern next year from SWT where they will be paired with 150's. I do know Northern were in talks with the Dft about recieving extra stock next year.
Complete fabrication?
Turned out to be a disgruntled SWT user as origin.
Nothing that exciting im afraid. They are just 'livering' them in the same colour scheme which the thameslink fleet will arrive in from Siemens-light grey undercoat with blue doors. The internal modifications will also follow the colour scheme. This is apparently just to align the fleet in the same livery-the DfT wouldn't allow continuation of the FCC livery this close to end of franchise anyway as its a waste of money.
With Crossrail on the way and the announcement about Tfl taking over the West Anglia suburban routes, replacement of Class 315 by 2019 seems very likely.
(will be 40 years old by 2020).
61 units, can anyone tell me if the numbers crunch?
( I am making the assumption that Tfl will order new trains between 2014 - 2018).
Thought we weren't supposed to talk about then yet? That's what I was told. It seems to be the new TSGN livery which the FCC fleet will be a part of in just over a year. Interesting to see the splitting of the branding however between the routes.
This is what all the fuss is about.
![]()
365 in TSGN livery. by Sparkyscrum, on Flickr
Is there a thread on the forum about the TLF West Anglia thingmejig? I've searched to no avail.. Would have thought there would be a discussion on it![]()
I read it on a staff brief (yes I'm sad enough to read that stuff!) and didn't see anything on it about not being public info etc.
It looks more like an undercoat similar to how the other Siemens stock was delivered to greater anglia and London midland/central. Then when the new franchise older takes over they can paint them into their own fancy colours.
With Crossrail on the way and the announcement about Tfl taking over the West Anglia suburban routes, replacement of Class 315 by 2019 seems very likely.
(will be 40 years old by 2020).
61 units, can anyone tell me if the numbers crunch?
( I am making the assumption that Tfl will order new trains between 2014 - 2018).
Sorry to sound ignorant and to back track, but why are the Class 315s being taken away from the West Anglia routes?